Nearly 100,000 patients submitted saliva samples to a genetic testing laboratory, providing insights into their disease risk
Researchers at Mayo Clinic have employed next-generation sequencing technology to produce a massive collection of exome data from more than 100,000 patients, offering a detailed look at genetic variants that predispose people to certain diseases. The study, known as Tapestry, was administered by doctors and scientists from the clinic’s Center for Individualized Medicine and produced the “largest-ever collection of exome data, which include genes that code for proteins—key to understanding health and disease,” according to a Mayo Clinic news release.
For our clinical laboratory professionals, this shows the keen interest that a substantial portion of the population has in using their personal genetic data to help physicians identify their risk for many diseases and types of cancer. This support by healthcare consumers is a sign that labs should be devoting attention and resources to providing these types of gene sequencing services.
As Mayo explained in the news release, the exome includes nearly 20,000 genes that code for proteins. The researchers used the dataset to analyze genes associated with higher risk of heart disease and stroke along with several types of cancer. They noted that the data, which is now available to other researchers, will likely provide insights into other diseases as well, the news release notes.
“What we’ve accomplished with the Tapestry study is a blueprint for future endeavors in medical science,” said gastroenterologist and lead researcher Konstantinos Lazaridis, MD (above), in the news story. “It demonstrates that through innovation, determination and collaboration, we can deeply advance our understanding of DNA function and eventually other bio-molecules like RNA, proteins and metabolites, turning them into novel diagnostic tools to improve health, prevent illness, and even treat disease.” Some of these newly identified genetic markers may be incorporated into new clinical laboratory assays. (Photo copyright: Mayo Clinic.)
How Mayo Conducted the Tapestry Study
One notable aspect of the study was its methodology. The study launched in July 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since many patients were quarantined, researchers conducted the study remotely, without the need for the patients to visit a Mayo facility. It ran for five years through May 31, 2024. The news release notes that it’s the largest decentralized clinical trial ever conducted by the Mayo Clinic.
The researchers identified 1.3 million patients from the main Mayo Clinic campuses in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida who met the following eligibility criteria:
Participants had to be 18 or older,
they had to have internet and email access, and
be sufficiently proficient in speaking and reading English.
More than 114,000 patients consented to participate, but some later withdrew, resulting in a final sample of 98,222 individuals. Approximately two-thirds were women. Mean age was 57 (61.9 for men and 54.3 for women).
“It was a tremendous effort,” said Mayo Clinic gastroenterologist and lead researcher Konstantinos Lazaridis, MD, in the news release. “The engagement of such a number of participants in a relatively short time and during a pandemic showcased the trust and the dedication not only of our team but also of our patients.”
He added that the researchers “learned valuable lessons about some patients’ decisions not to participate in Tapestry, which will be the focus of future publications.”
Three Specific Genes
Enrolled patients were invited to visit a website, where they could view a video and submit an eligibility form. Once approved, they completed a digital consent agreement and received a saliva collection kit. Participants were also invited to provide information about their family history.
Helix, a clinical laboratory company headquartered in San Mateo, Calif., performed the exome sequencing.
Though Helix performed whole exome sequencing, the researchers were most interested in three specific sets of genes:
Patients received clinical results directly from Helix along with information about their ancestry. Clinical results were also transmitted to Mayo Clinic for inclusion in patients’ electronic health records (EHRs).
Among the participants, approximately 1,800 (1.9%) had what the researchers described as “actionable pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants.” About half of these were BRCA1/2.
These patients were invited to speak with a genetic counselor and encouraged to undergo additional testing to confirm the variants.
Tapestry Genomic Registry
In addition to the impact on the participants, Mayo Clinic’s now has an enormous amount of raw sequencing data stored in the Tapestry Genomic Registry, where it will be available for future research.
The database “has become a valuable resource for Mayo’s scientific community, with 118 research requests submitted,” the researchers wrote in the news release. Mayo has distribution more than a million exome datasets to other genetic researchers.
“What we’ve accomplished with the Tapestry study is a blueprint for future endeavors in medical science,” Lazaridis noted. “It demonstrates that through innovation, determination, and collaboration, we can deeply advance our understanding of DNA function and eventually other bio-molecules like RNA, proteins and metabolites, turning them into novel diagnostic tools to improve health, prevent illness, and even treat disease.”
Everything about this project is consistent with precision medicine, and the number of individuals discovered to have risk of cancers is relevant. Clinical laboratory professionals understand these ratios and the importance of early detection and early intervention.
Study findings could lead to new clinical laboratory screening tests that determine risk for cancer
New disease biomarkers generally lead to new clinical laboratory tests. Such may be the case in an investigational study conducted at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom (UK). Researchers in the university’s Cancer Epidemiology Unit (CEU) have discovered certain proteins that appear to indicate the presence of cancer years before the disease is diagnosed.
The Oxford scientists “investigated associations between 1,463 plasma proteins and 19 cancers, using observational and genetic approaches in participants of the UK Biobank. They found 618 protein-cancer associations and 317 cancer biomarkers, which included 107 cases detected over seven years before the diagnosis of cancer,” News Medical reported.
To conduct their study, the scientists turned to “new multiplex proteomics techniques” that “allow for simultaneous assessment of proteins at a high-scale, especially those that remain unexplored in the cancer risk context,” News Medical added.
Many of these proteins were in “blood samples of people who developed cancer more than seven years before they received a diagnosis,” an Oxford Population Health news release notes.
“To be able to prevent cancer, we need to understand the factors driving the earliest stages of its development. These studies are important because they provide many new clues about the causes and biology of multiple cancers, including insights into what’s happening years before a cancer is diagnosed,” said Ruth Travis, BA, MSc, DPhil, senior molecular epidemiologist at Oxford Population Health and senior study author, in the news release.
“We now have technology that can look at thousands of proteins across thousands of cancer cases, identifying which proteins have a role in the development of specific cancers and which may have effects that are common to multiple cancer types,” said Ruth Travis, BA, MSc, DPhil (above), senior molecular epidemiologist, Oxford Population Health, in a news release. The study findings could lead to new clinical laboratory screening tests for cancer. (Photo copyright: University of Oxford.)
Proteomics to Address Multiple Cancers Analysis
In their published paper, the Oxford scientists acknowledged other research that identified links between blood proteins and risk for various cancers, including breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers. They saw an opportunity to use multiplex proteomics methods for the simultaneous measurement of proteins “many of which have not previously been assessed for their associations with risk across multiple cancer sites,” the researchers noted.
The researchers described “an integrated multi-omics approach” and the use of the Olink Proximity Extension Assay (PEA) to quantify 1,463 proteins in blood samples from 44,645 participants in the UK Biobank, a large biomedical database and resource to scientists.
Olink, a part of Thermo Fisher Scientific in Waltham, Mass., explains on its website that PEA technology “uniquely combines specificity and scalability to enable high-throughput, multiplex protein biomarker analysis.”
The researchers also compared proteins of people “who did and did not go on to be diagnosed with cancer” to determine differences and identify proteins that suggest cancer risk, News Medical reported.
Proteins Could Assist in Cancer Prevention
“To save more lives from cancer, we need to better understand what happens at the earliest stages of the disease. Data from thousands of people with cancer has revealed really exciting insights into how the proteins in our blood can affect our risk of cancer. Now we need to study these proteins in depth to see which ones could be reliably used for cancer prevention,” Keren Papier, PhD, senior nutritional epidemiologist at Oxford Population Health and joint lead author of the study, told News Medical.
While further studies and regulatory clearance are needed before the Oxford researchers’ approach to identifying cancer in its early stages can be used in patient care, their study highlights scientists’ growing interest in finding biomarker combinations that can predict or diagnose cancer even when it is presymptomatic. By focusing on proteins rather than DNA and RNA, researchers are turning to a source of information other than human genes.
For anatomic pathologists and clinical laboratory leaders, the Oxford study demonstrates how scientific teams are rapidly developing new knowledge about human biology and proteins that are likely to benefit patient care and diagnostics.
Anatomic pathologists understand that, along with breast cancer, diagnostic testing for prostate cancer accounts for a high volume of clinical laboratory tests. Thus, a recent study indicating that a new artificial intelligence (AI)-based software tool can dramatically improve physicians’ ability to identify the extent of these cancers will be of interest.
“The study found that Unfold AI’s patient-specific encapsulation confidence score (ECS), which is generated based on multiple patient data points, including MRI scans, biopsy results, PSA [prostate-specific antigen] data, and Gleason scores, is critical for predicting treatment success,” an Avenda press release states. “These findings emphasize the importance of Unfold AI’s assessment of tumor margins in predicting treatment outcomes, surpassing the predictive capability of conventional parameters.”
“Unfold AI’s ability to identify tumor margins and provide the ECS will improve treatment recommendations and allow for less-invasive interventions,” said study co-author Wayne Brisbane, MD, a urologic oncologist and UCLA medical professor, in another press release. “This more comprehensive approach enhances our ability to predict treatment outcomes and tailor interventions effectively to individual patient needs.”
“This study is important because it shows the ability of AI to not only replicate expert physicians, but to go beyond human ability,” said study co-author Wayne Brisbane, MD (above), a urologic oncologist and UCLA medical professor, in a press release. “By increasing the accuracy of cancer identification in the prostate, more precise and effective treatment methods can be prescribed for patients.” Clinical laboratories that work with anatomic pathologists to diagnose prostate and other cancers may soon have a new AI testing tool. (Photo copyright: UCLA.)
How Unfold AI Works
To gauge the extent of prostate tumors, surgeons typically evaluate results from multiple diagnostic methods such as PSA tests and imaging scans such as MRIs, according to a UCLA press release. However some portions of a tumor may be invisible to an MRI, causing doctors to underestimate the size.
Unfold AI, originally known as iQuest, was designed to analyze data from PSA, MRI, fusion biopsy, and pathology testing, according to a company brochure. From there, it generates a 3D map of the cancer. Avenda’s website says the technology provides a more accurate representation of the tumor’s extent than conventional methods.
“Accurately determining the extent of prostate cancer is crucial for treatment planning, as different stages may require different approaches such as active surveillance, surgery, focal therapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of these treatments,” Brisbane said in the UCLA press release.
Putting AI to the Test
In the new study, the UCLA researchers enlisted seven urologists and three radiologists to review 50 prostate cancer cases. Each patient had undergone prostatectomy—surgical removal of all or part of the prostate—but might have been eligible for focal therapy, a less-aggressive approach that uses heat, cryotherapy, or electric shocks to attack cancer cells more selectively.
The physicians came from five hospitals and had a wide range of clinical experience from two to 23 years, the researchers noted in The Journal of Urology.
They reviewed clinical data and examined MRI scans of each patient, then “manually drew outlines around the suspected cancerous areas, aiming to encapsulate all significant disease,” the press release states. “Then, after waiting for at least four weeks, they reexamined the same cases, this time using AI software to assist them in identifying the cancerous areas.”
The researchers analyzed the physicians’ work, evaluating the accuracy of the cancer margins and the “negative margin rate,” indicating whether the clinicians had identified all of the cancerous tissue. Using conventional approaches, “doctors only achieved a negative margin 1.6% of the time,” the press release states. “When assisted by AI the number increased to 72.8%.”
The clinicians’ accuracy was 84.7% when assisted by AI versus 67.2% to 75.9% for conventional techniques.
They also found that clinicians who used the AI software were more likely to recommend focal therapy over more aggressive forms of treatment.
“We saw the use of AI assistance made doctors both more accurate and more consistent, meaning doctors tended to agree more when using AI assistance,” said Avenda Health co-founder and CEO Shyam Natarajan, PhD, who was senior author of the study.
“These results demonstrate a marked change in how physicians will be able to diagnose and recommend treatment for prostate cancer patients,” said Natarajan in a company press release. “By increasing the confidence in which we can predict a tumor’s margins, patients and their doctors will have increased certainty that their entire tumor is treated and with the appropriate intervention in correlation to the severity of their case.”
UCLA’s study found that AI can outperform doctors both in sensitivity (a higher detection rate of positive cancers) and specificity (correctly detecting the sample as negative). That’s relevant and worth watching for further developments.
Pathologists and clinical laboratory managers should consider this use of AI as one more example of how artificial intelligence can be incorporated into diagnostic tests in ways that allow medical laboratory professionals to diagnose disease earlier and more accurately. This will improve patient care because early intervention for most diseases leads to better outcomes.
Findings could lead to new clinical laboratory cancer screening tests for BRCA1 and BRCA2 among specific population regions
Descendants of a remote Scottish island are much more likely to carry a cancer-causing BRCA2 gene than the rest of the UK. That’s according to a study conducted by the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. For pathologists and clinical laboratory managers, the study’s findings demonstrate how ongoing research into the genetic makeup of subpopulations will find groups that have higher risk for specific health conditions than the general population. Thus, diagnosticians can pay closer attention to screening these groups to achieve early diagnosis and intervention.
“The findings follow earlier research from the Viking Genes study that found a cancer-causing variant in the related BRCA1 gene, common among people from Orkney [a group of islands off Scotland’s northern coast],” noted a University of Edinburgh news release.
In their latest research, the genetic scientists discovered that the BRCA2 gene can be found in one in every 40 people with heritage from the island of Whalsay in Scotland’s Shetland island group. This gene is one of the most common genes that can be linked to breast cancer and ovarian cancer in women and breast and prostate cancer in men.
Those who inherit the BRCA2 gene have a significantly higher risk of developing certain cancers than the general population. For example, according to the National Cancer Institute, more than 60% of women who inherit the gene will develop breast cancer in their lifetimes.
The volunteers in the Viking Genes study have a risk of having a BRCA2 gene that is 130 times higher than the general UK population. According to the BBC, geneticists believe the gene can be traced back to one family from the island of Whalsay before 1750.
“It is very important to understand that just two gene changes account for more than 90% of the inherited cancer risk from BRCA variants in Orkney and Shetland. This is in stark contrast to the situation in the general UK population, where 369 variants would need to be tested to account for the same proportion of cancer risk from BRCA genes. Any future screening program for the Northern Isles should therefore be very cost-effective,” said James Wilson, DPhil, FRCPE (above), Professor of Human Genetics at University of Edinburgh and leader of the study, in a news release. Clinical laboratories in the UK will be involved in those screenings. (Photo copyright: Scottish Genomes Partnership.)
Early Diagnosis Brings Hope to Families
The UK’s National Health Service (NHS) offers genetic testing to relatives of people with a known BRCA variant. Individuals with at least one Whalsay grandparent, and who have a close family history of breast, ovarian, or prostate cancer, can also request NHS testing.
As the BBC reported, University of Edinburgh’s discovery has given families answers and hope for the future. Individuals who fit the criteria for being at risk of inheriting the BRCA gene can narrow their testing and work more specifically on preventative measures with their doctors.
Christine Glaser, a woman from Lerwick in Shetland, learned she carried the BRCA gene after participating in the study. Though the Viking genes research took place nearly a decade ago, scientific understanding of genes has improved allowing geneticists to draw new conclusions from previous studies.
Although Glaser lost her sister to ovarian cancer, she and her family were unaware of their heightened genetic risk.
“I got offered preventative measures so I could get my ovaries removed and I could get a mastectomy. So, that’s what I did … when I got my ovaries removed, they checked them and there was no cancer, but then I had a mammogram and they found cancer,” she told the BBC. Glaser’s cancer was successfully treated thanks to early detection.
Closing Gap in Genetic Testing
“This BRCA2 variant in Whalsay I think arose prior to 1750. This is why these things become so common in given places because many people descend from a couple quite far back in the past, and if they have a cancer variant, then a significant number of people today—five or even 10 generations later—will have it. This is true everywhere in Scotland, it’s just magnified in these small places,” said James Wilson, DPhil, FRCPE, Professor of Human Genetics at University of Edinburgh, who led the study on Viking genes that found individuals with familial ties to two small Scottish communities may be at a higher risk of having a cancer-causing gene.
Wilson hopes to see testing for these genetic abnormalities become more common for these at-risk communities.
“The Ashkenazi Jewish community have BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants that also have a frequency of about one in 40,” he told the BBC. “The Ashkenazi Jewish population in England are able to take part in genetic testing for these genes but that’s not yet the case in Scotland.”
The findings of the most recent University of Edinburgh genetic study are very new. Future developments and offerings from the NHS may be influenced by the results.
Deeper understanding about the genetic make-up of certain population subgroups could lead to new genetic personalized medicine and preventative testing for those at risk of hereditary cancer. In turn, it could also encourage individuals to seek preventative care earlier. Thus, pathologists and clinical laboratory managers should keep an eye on these developments and be prepared to work with geneticists who may develop new screening methods for BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Though not biomarkers per se, these scores for certain genetic traits may someday be used by clinical laboratories to identify individuals’ risk for specific diseases
Can polygenic risk scores (a number that denotes a person’s genetic predisposition for certain traits) do a better job at predicting the likelihood of developing specific diseases, perhaps even before the onset of symptoms? Researchers at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (Broad Institute) believe so, and their study could have implications for clinical laboratories nationwide.
In cooperation with medical centers across the US, the scientists “optimized 10 polygenic scores for use in clinical research as part of a study on how to implement genetic risk prediction for patients,” according to a Broad Institute news release.
The research team “selected, optimized, and validated the tests for 10 common diseases [selected from a total of 23 conditions], including heart disease, breast cancer, and type 2 diabetes. They also calibrated the tests for use in people with non-European ancestries,” the news release notes.
As these markers for genetic risk become better understood they may work their way into clinical practice. This could mean clinical laboratories will have a role in sequencing patients’ DNA to provide physicians with information about the probability of a patient’s elevated genetic risk for certain conditions.
However, the effectiveness of polygenic risk scores has faced challenges among diverse populations, according to the news release, which also noted a need to appropriately guide clinicians in use of the scores.
“With this work, we’ve taken the first steps toward showing the potential strength and power of these scores across a diverse population,” said Niall Lennon, PhD (above), Chief Scientific Officer of Broad Clinical Labs. “We hope in the future this kind of information can be used in preventive medicine to help people take actions that lower their risk of disease.” Clinical laboratories may eventually be tasked with performing DNA sequencing to determine potential genetic risk for certain diseases. (Photo copyright: Broad Institute.)
Polygenic Scores Need to Reflect Diversity
“There have been a lot of ongoing conversations and debates about polygenic risk scores and their utility and applicability in the clinical setting,” said Niall Lennon, PhD, Chair and Chief Scientific Officer of Broad Clinical Labs and first author of the study, in the news release. However, he added, “It was important that we weren’t giving people results that they couldn’t do anything about.”
In the paper, Lennon and colleagues explained polygenic risk scores “aggregate the effects of many genetic risk variants” to identify a person’s genetic predisposition for a certain disease or phenotype.
“But their development and application to clinical care, particularly among ancestrally diverse individuals, present substantial challenges,” they noted. “Clinical use of polygenic risk scores may ultimately prevent disease or enable its detection at earlier, more treatable stages.”
The scientists set a research goal to “optimize polygenic risk scores for a diversity of people.”
While performing the polygenic risk score testing on participants, Broad Clinical Labs focused on 10 conditions—including cardiometabolic diseases and cancer—selected by the research team based on “polygenic risk score performance, medical actionability, and clinical utility,” the Nature Medicine paper explained.
For each condition, the researchers:
Identified “exact spots in the genome that they would analyze to calculate the risk score.”
Used information from the NIH’s All of Us Research Program to “create a model to calibrate a person’s polygenic risk score according to that individual’s genetic ancestry.”
The All of Us program, which aims to collect health information from one million US residents, has three times more people of non-European ancestry than other data sources developing genetic risk scores, HealthDay News reported.
20% of Study Participants Showed High Risk for Disease
To complete their studies, Broad Institute researchers processed a diverse group of eMERGE participants to determine their clinical polygenic risk scores for each of the 10 diseases between July 2022 and August 2023.
Listed below are all conditions studied, as well as the number of participants involved in each study and the number of people with scores indicating high risk of the disease, according to their published paper:
Over 500 people (about 20%) of the 2,500 participants, had high risk for at least one of the 10 targeted diseases, the study found.
Participants in the study self-reported their race/ancestry as follows, according to the paper:
White: 32.8%
Black: 32.8%
Hispanic: 25.4%
Asian: 5%
American Indian: 1.5%
Middle Eastern: 0.9%
No selection: 0.8%
“We can’t fix all biases in the risk scores, but we can make sure that if a person is in a high-risk group for a disease, they’ll get identified as high risk regardless of what their genetic ancestry is,” Lennon said.
Further Studies, Scoring Implications
With 10 tests in hand, Broad Clinical Labs plans to calculate risk scores for all 25,000 people in the eMERGE network. The researchers also aim to conduct follow-up studies to discover what role polygenic risk scores may play in patients’ overall healthcare.
“Ultimately, the network wants to know what it means for a person to receive information that says they’re at high risk for one of these diseases,” Lennon said.
The researchers’ findings about disease risk are likely also relevant to healthcare systems, which want care teams to make earlier, pre-symptomatic diagnosis to keep patients healthy.
Clinical laboratory leaders may want to follow Broad Clinical Labs’ studies as they perform the 10 genetic tests and capture information about what participants may be willing to do—based on risk scores—to lower their risk for deadly diseases.
