News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

Sign In

Clinical Labs May Gain New Edge in Early Cancer Detection with Epigenetic Instability Liquid Biopsy

Johns Hopkins researchers show that measuring DNA methylation variability can improve early cancer detection accuracy and strengthen liquid biopsy performance across diverse patient populations.

Researchers at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center are advancing a new approach to liquid biopsy that could improve early cancer detection by focusing on variability in DNA methylation patterns—rather than absolute levels—offering a potentially more reliable biomarker across diverse patient populations.

Dark Daily’s sibling publication Today’s Clinical Lab reported that the liquid biopsy market is expected to increase by approximately 20% between 2022 and 2032, noting early cancer detection as a driver of the increase.

The method introduces a novel metric called the Epigenetic Instability Index (EII), designed to measure random variation, or “stochasticity,” in DNA methylation. In a proof-of-concept study published in Clinical Cancer Research, the approach demonstrated strong performance in distinguishing patients with early-stage cancers from healthy individuals.

“This is the first study where we are trying to really implement measuring that variation, or stochasticity, into a diagnostic tool,” said lead author Hariharan Easwaran, PhD. “We immediately found that measuring DNA methylation variation performs better than just measuring DNA methylation by itself.”

Model Targets Methylation Variability to Improve Multi-Cancer Detection

Traditional methylation-based liquid biopsies typically rely on detecting fixed changes at specific genomic sites. However, those tests are often developed using narrow patient cohorts and can struggle to generalize across broader populations. By contrast, the EII approach aims to capture a more universal biological signal tied to early tumor development.

To build the model, researchers analyzed more than 2,000 publicly available DNA methylation samples and identified 269 genomic regions (CpG islands) that capture the majority of methylation variability across cancer types.

“We identified specific genomic regions that tend to be the most variable in DNA methylation marks during cancer,” said first author Sara-Jayne Thursby, a postdoctoral researcher in Easwaran’s lab. “In cell-free DNA in the blood, that variability shouldn’t be high, but if it is, it is indicative of a developing cancerous phenotype.”

Using these regions, the team trained a machine learning model that demonstrated high accuracy across multiple cancers. In lung adenocarcinoma, the test detected stage 1A disease with 81% sensitivity at 95% specificity. For early-stage breast cancer, sensitivity reached approximately 68% at the same specificity level. The tool also showed potential utility in colon, pancreatic, brain, and prostate cancers.

Researchers say the findings support the idea that epigenetic instability may be an early hallmark of cancer progression.

“We hypothesize that early-stage tumors and precancerous lesions that exhibit high degrees of methylation variation… may be more resistant to intrinsic cancer-protective mechanisms and progress more rapidly,” said co-lead author Thomas Pisanic, PhD.

Looking ahead, the team plans to further validate the EII in larger clinical studies and position it as a complementary tool alongside existing screening methods. Easwaran noted that the test could serve as a “secondary triaging measure,” helping clinicians determine whether follow-up procedures—such as biopsies—are necessary after inconclusive or false-positive screening results.

For clinical laboratories, the approach signals a growing shift toward more nuanced, data-driven biomarkers that may improve early detection while reducing unnecessary procedures.

This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.

—Janette Wider

Study Hints at Clinical Lab’s Future Role in Investigating Sudden Unexplained Death in Children

UW Medicine and Seattle Children’s launch long-read sequencing research to uncover genetic factors, setting new standards for pediatric genomic testing.

The Sudden Unexplained Death in Childhood (SUDC) Foundation has awarded funding to a team at UW Medicine and Seattle Children’s Hospital to use PacBio HiFi long-read sequencing as a first-line tool to investigate cases of SUDC.

The study represents a critical step in both research and clinical laboratory practice. Applying long-read sequencing as a first-tier assay can streamline workflows, particularly when working with challenging samples such as post-mortem tissue or dried blood spots. Laboratories involved will need to combine advanced sequencing with robust bioinformatics pipelines, accurate variant interpretation, and integration of parental genomes to provide clinically relevant results.

The study, led by Danny E. Miller, MD, PhD, assistant professor of pediatrics and laboratory medicine and pathology at the University of Washington, and Alexandra Keefe, MD, PhD, assistant professor of pediatrics at UW Medicine, will sequence 200 family trios—a child and their parents—aiming to uncover genetic factors that may contribute to these sudden, unexplained deaths.

PacBio’s Revio system with SPRQ-Nx chemistry will be used to generate highly accurate long-read genomes, allowing researchers to detect complex structural variants and tandem repeats that traditional sequencing may miss. By including parental data, the team hopes to distinguish inherited variants from spontaneous mutations, increasing the likelihood of actionable findings for families.

Long-Read Sequencing Advances SUDC Investigations

“Selecting HiFi sequencing as our first-line whole-genome assay allows us to search for answers with the accuracy and breadth these families deserve,” said Miller. “By starting with long reads and incorporating parental data, we can resolve difficult variants, phase them accurately, and provide guidance relevant to SUDC.”

The SUDC Foundation currently assists over 1,000 families in more than 20 countries. The organization emphasizes the importance of comprehensive investigations for sudden child deaths, including genetic testing, DNA banking, and family screening when appropriate.

“Families affected by SUDC face unimaginable loss,” said Julia Burgess, president of the SUDC Foundation. “Funding this project reflects our commitment to advancing research that brings clarity, guidance, and hope to grieving families nationwide.”

Beyond supporting families, the research could establish a model for how cutting-edge genomic testing is incorporated into clinical investigations of sudden childhood deaths. The team plans to implement a tiered genomic approach for cases with suspected genetic causes, beginning with trio-based exome and low-pass whole-genome sequencing, followed by reflexive long-read sequencing when necessary.

“This project has the potential not only to provide answers to families but also to transform standards for genetic investigation in pediatric sudden death,” said Keefe. “It highlights the essential role laboratories play in turning advanced genomic technologies into actionable clinical knowledge.” (Photo credit: UW Medicine)

The SUDC Foundation expects the study, funded at $328,133 over four years, to generate data that supports broader adoption of long-read sequencing in pediatric genomics and enhance understanding of the genetic underpinnings of SUDC.

For clinical laboratory professionals, this initiative underscores the growing expectation that advanced genomic technologies—particularly long-read whole-genome sequencing and trio analysis—will play a larger role in investigating unexplained pediatric deaths. As these tools move toward first-line use, labs must be prepared to support complex variant detection, robust bioinformatics interpretation, and collaboration with clinicians and medical examiners, positioning the laboratory at the center of efforts to deliver clearer answers for families.

—Janette Wider

Roche and Partners Push Sequencing Boundaries with Record-Breaking SBX Technology

Roche’s SBX technology just helped Broad Clinical Labs set a GUINNESS WORLD RECORD for the fastest DNA sequencing ever.

According to a recent press release, for laboratory leaders tracking the next wave of genomic innovation, Roche’s latest advancements in sequencing technology could signal a major shift in research capabilities. At the 2025 American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) Annual Meeting, the company unveiled new data and collaborations around its Sequencing by Expansion (SBX) platform—a system designed to deliver faster, longer, and more flexible reads.

This technology’s growing adoption by research institutions suggests it could soon reshape how labs approach complex multiomic analysis, precision oncology, and translational research.

World Record Broken

A highlight of the 2025 ASHG Annual Meeting was the GUINNESS WORLD RECORD achievement by Broad Clinical Labs, which used SBX to complete the fastest human genome sequencing to date, processing a sample from DNA extraction to final variant call file in under four hours. This record, achieved in collaboration with Roche Sequencing Solutions and Boston Children’s Hospital, surpassed the previous mark of just over five hours, demonstrating SBX’s ability to deliver rapid, high-quality results.

Mark Kokoris, inventor of the SBX chemistry and head of SBX Technology at Roche said, “The true impact lies in what this speed and accuracy mean for the scientific community and for deciphering complex diseases like cancer and neurodegenerative conditions.”

Mark Kokoris, inventor of the SBX chemistry and head of SBX Technology at Roche commented, “Breaking the GUINNESS WORLD RECORD is a remarkable achievement.” (Photo credit: Roche)

Roche also announced a new collaboration with the Wellcome Sanger Institute, which will conduct multi-project evaluations of SBX across applications such as Bulk RNA sequencing, where longer reads and higher throughput could uncover complex features like spliced isoforms. This partnership adds to a growing network of collaborations that include the Hartwig Medical Foundation, Genentech, The University of Tokyo, and the Broad Institute, reflecting widespread scientific interest in applying SBX across diverse research domains.

Further innovations include progress in methylation mapping using SBX-Duplex, which reads both DNA strands simultaneously, paired with TET-assisted pyridine borane sequencing (TAPS) from Watchmaker Genomics. This workflow enhances accuracy in detecting DNA methylation and holds promise for applications such as liquid biopsy-based cancer detection and novel biomarker discovery.

In another collaboration, researchers at the University of Tokyo leveraged SBX’s speed and flexibility for spatial sequencing of lung cancer tissue, achieving roughly 15 billion reads in just one hour. Roche also presented a target enrichment method using the SBX-Simplex workflow, which employs Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) to generate highly accurate reads from minimal input, an approach that could be particularly valuable in oncology research requiring deep sequencing coverage.

For diagnostics and research laboratories, Roche’s progress with SBX represents more than a technical milestone, it points to new operational opportunities. Potentially faster turnaround times, deeper insights across multiple molecular layers, and improved workflows could help labs expand their research portfolios and strengthen partnerships in precision medicine. As sequencing continues to evolve from discovery to real-world application, forward-thinking lab leaders will want to keep an eye on how SBX’s scalability and speed might redefine their own genomic testing strategies.

This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.

—Janette Wider

Genomics Uncovers Hidden NDM-1 Outbreak in ICU Plumbing

A UCLA microbiology lab used whole-genome sequencing to trace a carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas outbreak to a single ICU sink, revealing how biofilm and plumbing can silently harbor superbugs.

A routine culture from an ICU patient at UCLA Health sparked an investigation that ultimately uncovered a silent, domestic outbreak of a highly resistant strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The discovery was led by the Molecular Microbiology and Pathogen Genomics Laboratory and highlights the critical role clinical laboratories play in outbreak detection, antimicrobial resistance surveillance, and environmental tracking.

The findings were recently published in the American Journal of Infection Control.

The initial isolate appeared typical: P. aeruginosa, a common hospital-associated pathogen. But further analysis revealed something more troubling, the presence of NDM-1 (New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase), an enzyme that breaks down carbapenems and other powerful beta-lactam antibiotics, rendering them ineffective.

“This was the first time we’d ever seen an NDM-1-producing Pseudomonas strain in our hospital—and in a patient with no international travel,” said Shangxin Yang, PhD, director of UCLA Health’s Molecular Microbiology and Pathogen Genomics Laboratory.

Shangxin Yang, PhD, director of UCLA Health’s Molecular Microbiology and Pathogen Genomics Laboratory noted, “While NDM-1 is prevalent in Asia, Europe and the Middle East, it remains rare in the United States. That’s when we knew this wasn’t imported. This was something domestic—and very concerning.” (Photo credit: UCLA)

Sporadic Cases, Elusive Source

Over the next 18 months, seven additional patients were identified with the same rare resistance pattern. The cases were sporadic—spread across time and units—and did not follow conventional outbreak patterns, complicating source identification.

In collaboration with UCLA Health’s infection prevention team, the lab launched a detailed investigation. Routine epidemiologic methods failed to identify commonalities between the cases. Shared equipment, staffing patterns, and care protocols were ruled out. With limited leads, the microbiology team turned to whole-genome sequencing (WGS).

Whole-Genome Sequencing Connects the Dots

WGS became the turning point. By sequencing all eight patient isolates and comparing them to environmental samples, Yang’s lab determined that seven of the eight clinical isolates and two environmental strains shared an almost identical genomic profile. Only one isolate, from a patient previously treated in Iran, was genetically distinct.

“Whole-genome sequencing gave us the clarity we needed,” said Yang. “It allowed us to move from hypothesis to high-resolution confirmation—pinpointing the genetic relatedness of these organisms with certainty.”

The team had uncovered a clonal outbreak of NDM-1-producing P. aeruginosa, likely stemming from a single environmental reservoir.

Unexpected Reservoir: An ICU Sink

During a third round of environmental testing, the lab isolated the same NDM-1-producing strain from a contaminated sink drain and P-trap in one ICU room. Notably, two of the eight patients had been admitted to that room more than a year apart.

The persistence of the organism was attributed to biofilm formation in the sink plumbing. Pseudomonas is known for forming robust biofilms that adhere to moist surfaces and resist standard disinfection methods.

“This wasn’t just about surface contamination,” said Yang. “This was a deeply embedded reservoir that conventional cleaning protocols couldn’t touch.”

Lab-Driven Response and Mitigation

Once the lab identified the environmental source, targeted interventions were put in place:

  • Weekly disinfection of ICU sinks using Virasept, a biofilm-effective agent
  • Plumbing replacement, including P-trap components known to harbor persistent biofilms
  • Engineering modifications to faucet angles to reduce splash-back and droplet spread
  • Expanded environmental surveillance to monitor other sinks for colonization

The lab continued to monitor the situation post-intervention, and no further cases of NDM-1-producing P. aeruginosa have been identified since the changes were implemented.

Lessons Learned

This case reinforces the value of whole-genome sequencing in resolving complex outbreaks, linking patient isolates to an environmental source that traditional methods missed. It highlights the need to include plumbing and other biofilm-prone areas in environmental sampling. Most importantly, it shows how microbiology labs through genomic, phenotypic, and molecular tools can lead outbreak investigations, especially when paired with strong cross-department collaboration.

“This is a clear example of the power of the clinical lab when genomic tools and environmental surveillance are used strategically,” said Yang. “Without WGS, this would have remained an unsolved mystery.”

—Janette Wider

New Genetic Study Links FOXP4 Variants to Long COVID Risk

Published in “Nature Genetics,” the global study finds a strong link between FOXP4 expression and long COVID, offering new hope for diagnostic development.

A global study has uncovered genetic variants linked to an increased risk of long COVID, marking an important step toward understanding the biology of the condition and laying early groundwork for future diagnostic tools.

The recent study, “Genome-wide association study of long COVID,” is published in Nature Genetics, and it identified a significant genetic association between long COVID and variants in the FOXP4 gene, which is known to influence lung function. Higher levels of FOXP4 expression were found in individuals with long COVID, and the risk associated with these variants was consistent across different ancestry groups. This supports the idea that lung-related immune responses play a major role in long COVID, though the condition also involves a wide range of symptoms such as fatigue and cognitive dysfunction.

Future Diagnostic Advancements

For laboratory professionals, the findings from this large-scale genetic study on long COVID represent an important step toward future diagnostic innovation grounded in molecular evidence. While the identified FOXP4 variants and associated immune-lung pathways are not yet predictive at the individual level, they offer valuable insight into the underlying biology of long COVID—insight that can inform the development of biomarker assays and future diagnostic tools. As research advances, lab teams will be essential in validating and implementing potential biomarkers, integrating genetic and proteomic data into routine workflows, and supporting interdisciplinary efforts to transition these discoveries from bench to bedside. Though clinically actionable tests may still be years away, the study underscores the evolving role of the clinical lab in decoding complex, post-viral syndromes through precision diagnostics and collaborative research.

Conducted by the Long COVID Host Genetics Initiative, the study analyzed data from 33 independent studies across 19 countries, involving nearly 16,000 individuals diagnosed with long COVID and about 1.9 million control participants. The research included diverse populations across six genetic ancestries, making it one of the most comprehensive efforts to date using a genome-wide association study (GWAS) approach.

Today’s Clinical Lab reported in 2024 that “As early as spring 2020, people who had survived COVID-19 began publicly sharing their ongoing symptoms and struggles to recover. Originally driven almost entirely by patients, researchers and clinicians eventually responded to the push to investigate these reports, ultimately publishing a study showing that only one in eight participants were symptom-free two months after infection. From that point, research into the post-viral condition, popularly termed ‘long COVID,’ accelerated—from 105 articles published on the topic in 2020 to nearly 5,000 in 2023.”

Studies Continue

In addition to identifying genetic risk factors, the researchers established a causal link between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the development of long COVID, particularly in cases involving severe illness that required hospitalization. The study also explored the overlap between long COVID-associated variants and those related to other diseases, suggesting that both genetic predisposition and environmental factors contribute to the risk of developing long COVID.

Hanna Ollila, PhD, a co-author of the study from the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland and Massachusetts General Hospital, said, “The findings from our study, and from genome-wide association studies in general, tell about biological mechanisms behind a disease. This can then help to understand the disease better. For example, is it a disease neuronal, immune, metabolic, and so on?”

She also explained that developing a diagnostic test from these findings will take time, as the genetic variants identified don’t have the strong, direct impact seen in mutations like BRCA in breast cancer.

“In other words, they do not strongly predict whether someone will develop long COVID at the individual level. Instead, they highlight the biological systems involved in the disease. In this case, our findings point to immune pathways related to lung function,” Ollila noted.

The researchers reported that as larger sample sizes become available in future studies, the accuracy and depth of genetic analyses will improve. This could help scientists more clearly define the biological underpinnings of long COVID and identify specific biomarkers for diagnosis. Despite the progress made, Ollila commented it could still take a decade or more to develop clinically useful diagnostic tools based on these genetic insights.

—Janette Wider

New Blood Test Helps Physicians Diagnose Rare Genetic Diseases in Infants Using Just a Small Drop of Blood

Researchers expect their test to reduce diagnostic time in clinical settings and help identify carriers of the diseases

Clinical laboratories have always been at the forefront of helping families battle rare diseases. But such testing is sometimes invasive and expensive. Now there’s a new blood test that is minimally invasive and rapidly detects thousands of rare genetic diseases in infants and children using a mere 1ml of blood.

Developed at the University of Melbourne and Murdoch Children’s Research Institute in Australia, the test rapidly detects abnormalities using proteomics to simultaneously analyze the pathogenicity of thousands of gene mutations that cause rare genetic illnesses.

The single-drop blood test sequences proteins present in the genes rather than the genes themselves to discover how genetic changes within those proteins affect function and lead to disease. According to the scientists, the test is cost-effective, potentially eradicates the need for other functional tests, and may be applicable to thousands of different diseases. Results of the test are typically available within three days, providing patients with earlier access to any available treatments.

“A recent study carried out in collaboration with the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health revealed that implementing our test in a clinical setting would have a similar cost to that of the current test used to diagnose rare mitochondrial disease, with the advantage that our test can potentially diagnose thousands of other diseases,” said the study’s co-author, Daniella Hock, PhD, a research fellow in clinical proteomics in the department of biochemistry and pharmacology at the University of Melbourne, in a news release.

The researchers presented their findings at the annual European Society of Human Genetics conference in Milan, Italy, and also in the journal Genome Medicine titled, “Untargeted Proteomics Enables Ultra-Rapid Variant Prioritization in Mitochondrial and Other Rare Diseases.”

“Our new test can identify more than 8,000 proteins in peripheral blood mononuclear cells covering more than 50% of known Mendelian and mitochondrial disease genes, as well as enable us to discover new disease genes,” said Daniella Hock, PhD, research fellow in clinical proteomics, department of biochemistry and pharmacology at the University of Melbourne, in the news release. (Photo copyright: Mito Foundation.)

Identifying Disease Carriers

The researchers also performed blood analysis on the parents to help identify the carriers of genetic illnesses and possibly develop reproductive methods to avoid the occurrence of those diseases in future pregnancies.

“When the test is also performed on blood samples from parents we call it trio analysis. In recessively inherited conditions, this helps considerably in differentiating between carriers, who only have one copy of the defective gene, and the affected individual, who carries two copies,” Hock said. “Moreover, the use of familial samples for trio analysis greatly improves the differentiation between carrier and affected individuals with higher confidence, and that has exceeded our initial expectations. We believe that the use of this test in clinical practice will bring considerable benefits to patients, their families, and healthcare systems by reducing the diagnostic time.”

Getting the Right Diagnosis

There are more than 7,000 types of categorized rare diseases which affect approximately 300 to 400 million people worldwide. These diseases are caused by genetic mutations that exist in more than 5,000 known genes. The new test focuses on rare genetic illnesses known as monogenetic disorders, such as cystic fibrosis and mitochondrial disease, that are caused by a single gene alteration or mutation.

According to the National Organization for Rare Disorders, 25 to 30 million Americans are living with a rare disorder. A condition is categorized as rare if it affects less than 200,000 individuals.

Global Genes states on its website that 400 million people worldwide suffer from a rare disease and half of those diagnosed are children. It also states that 80% of those diseases are genetic and 95% of rare diseases lack a treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

“One of the hardest things for patients with rare diseases is getting the right diagnosis,” said Sharon Barr, PhD, executive vice-president of biopharmaceuticals research and development at AstraZeneca Rare Disease, in an interview with STAT News.

On average, it takes about five years to accurately diagnose a rare disease patient. During that period, that patient sees various specialists, undergoes difficult tests, and potentially faces the wrong diagnosis, Barr said.

Initial results stemming from the new clinical laboratory test are encouraging, but more research and clinical trials are needed before the test can be used on a widespread level.                

—JP Schlingman

;