New recommendations from the Alzheimer’s Association call for Alzheimer’s blood tests to reach at least 90% sensitivity and specificity to be used in place of established diagnostic tools.
Alzheimer’s blood tests need to offer at least 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity before they can replace brain scans and spinal taps in diagnosis of the neurodegenerative disease, according to a new clinical practice guideline recommendation from the Alzheimer’s Association.
The health organization cautioned in a news release that “many commercially available blood-based biomarker tests do not meet these thresholds” for substituting amyloid PET imaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests in Alzheimer’s diagnosis.
“The whole purpose of developing the clinical practice guideline is to try to create pragmatic recommendations for clinicians on how to choose the right test for the right patient at the right time,” Rebecca Edelmayer, PhD, Alzheimer’s Association Vice President of Scientific Engagement, told Medscape. “The blood- based biomarker area is still a burgeoning field,” added Edelmayer, a guideline Co-author.
Clinical laboratories may find the recommendations useful in making decisions about additions to lab test menus and in educating clinicians on appropriate test ordering.
“Pathologically, Alzheimer’s disease is defined by the accumulation of extracellular cortical plaques composed of amyloid-beta fibrils and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles containing abnormal hyperphosphorylated tau protein. These pathologies manifest many years or even decades before the onset of clinical symptoms,” the authors wrote.
Compared to “standard-of-care” amyloid PET imaging and CSF tests, blood-based biomarkers may cost less and reduce patients’ stress, the Alzheimer’s Association pointed out, adding that blood tests are not a replacement for clinical evaluations by healthcare providers.
“What we’ve learned from all of the evidence so far is that some of these biomarkers, like tau217, tend to be very accurate predictors of Alzheimer’s disease biology in the brain, and they can be used to aid in the diagnostic process early on—sometimes even before tau tangle formations can be visualized with brain imaging,” Rebecca Edelmayer, PhD, Alzheimer’s Association Vice President of Scientific Engagement, said in the Medscape article. (Photo credit: Alzheimer’s Association.)
Panel Reviews Phosphorylated-tau and Amyloid-beta
To discover the diagnostic accuracy of blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease, a panel of 11 clinicians, convened by the Alzheimer’s Association, did a systematic review using this methodology described in the association’s statement:
Reviewed 49 observational studies and assessed 31 tests.
Focused on blood-based biomarkers including plasma phosphorylated-tau (p-tau) and amyloid beta (Aβ) tests measuring: p-tau217, ratio of p-tau217 to non-p-tau217 x 100, p-tau181, p-tau231, and ratio of Aβ42 to Aβ40.
Panelists, unaware of the tests they were reviewing, did not rank or endorse tests.
Diagnostic accuracy varied among the assays with sensitivity ranging from 49.31% to 91.41% and specificity from 61.54% to 96.72%, Neurology Advisorreported.
Tests evaluated included these, which were also recently reported on by Dark Daily:
Based on the systematic review, the panel released the following recommendations for use of blood-based biomarker tests when Alzheimer’s disease is suspected, according to the Alzheimer’s Association:
Tests with 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity or more may stand-in for PET amyloid imaging or CSF Alzheimer’s biomarker testing.
Tests with at least 90% sensitivity and 75% specificity can serve as triaging assays whereby negative results rule out Alzheimer’s “with high probability” while positive findings need confirmation with PET or CSF testing.
“For the first time, we have a rigorously evidence-based guideline that empowers clinicians to use blood biomarker tests confidently and consistently. Adoption of these recommendations will lead to quicker, more accessible, more accurate diagnoses, and better outcomes,” said Maria Carillo, PhD, Alzheimer’s Association Chief Science Officer and Medical Affairs Lead and a Co-author of the guideline.
The guideline is part of the Alzheimer’s Association resources to promote best practices. It plans development of other reports about cognitive assessment tools, clinical implementation of staging, and Alzheimer’s prevention.
Research could lead to new biomarkers that detect Alzheimer’s much earlier than existing tests and help scientists understand why some people with the disease do not develop dementia
Key biomarkers for detecting the progression of Alzheimer’s disease have typically been based on amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques. But these plaques show up after the disease has well-progressed and aren’t suited to early detection of the disease.
Now, researchers at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (Pitt) have developed a cerebrospinal fluid (CFS) test that detects changes in tau protein prior to the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) that proceed Aβ plaques.
With further research, Pitt’s test could lead to new clinical laboratory biomarkers that help detect the disease earlier and with more accuracy.
“The clumping of tau protein into well-ordered structures, referred to by pathologists as neurofibrillary tangles, is a more defining event for Alzheimer’s disease as it is more strongly associated with the cognitive changes,” as compared to amyloid-beta pathology, according to a Pitt news release.
The researchers showed that their CSF biomarker test worked independent of discovery of brain amyloid deposits and “correlates with severity of cognitive decline” to enable “early-stage disease diagnosis and intervention,” reported Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.
“Our test identifies very early stages of tau tangle formation—up to a decade before any tau clumps can show up on a brain scan,” said Thomas Karikari, PhD (above), senior author and assistant professor of psychiatry at Pitt, in a news release. (Photo copyright: University of Pittsburgh.)
Combining Biomarkers May Lead to Better Alzheimer’s Knowledge
The new biomarkers may also work with existing markers that detect amyloid-beta pathology. This could give researchers and healthcare providers a better understanding of the early stages of Alzheimer’s in specific patients.
“Amyloid-beta is a kindling, and tau is a matchstick,” said Thomas Karikari, PhD, senior author and assistant professor of psychiatry at Pitt. Karikari previously researched amyloid-beta.
“A large percentage of people who have brain amyloid-beta deposits will never develop dementia. But once the tau tangles light up on a brain scan, it may be too late to put out the fire, and their cognitive health can quickly deteriorate. Early detection of tangle-prone tau could identify the individuals who are likely to develop Alzheimer’s-associated cognitive decline and could be helped with new generation therapies,” he added.
“P-tau-217 and p-tau-181 are fantastic biomarkers. However, in the early days after we developed these markers, we wondered why they were much more reflective of amyloid pathology than tau pathology,” Karikari told MedPage Today.
“That’s what inspired this work. We believe that methods combining, say, p-tau-217 and p-tau-262 or 356, would provide more complete information on combined early-stage amyloid and tau pathologies in Alzheimer’s disease,” he noted.
Developing the Alzheimer’s Biomarker Test
Karikari and colleagues turned to biochemistry and molecular biology to develop their new test.
Specifically, they emphasized “building blocks of NFTs including oligomers and protomers” which they called “soluble tau assemblies,” Medical News Today explained.
According to the Pitt news release, using autopsied brain tissue, the researchers found:
A core region of the tau protein where NFTs form.
111 amino acids in the region.
New “phosphorylation sites of p-tau-262 and p-tau-356 can inform the status of early-stage tau aggregation that, with an appropriate intervention, could potentially be reversed.”
In other words, p-tau-262 and p-tau-356 “could predict future NFT production, making them potential biomarkers for early disease,” Medical News Today noted.
“Together, our findings inform about the status of early-stage tau aggregation, reveal aggregation-relevant phosphorylation epitopes in tau, and offer a diagnostic biomarker and targeted therapeutic opportunities for Alzheimer’s disease,” the authors wrote in Nature Medicine.
More Research Planned Before Clinical Lab Use
About seven million Americans are affected by Alzheimer’s, according to the Alzheimer’s Association, which expects that number to grow to 13 million by 2050. A cure for the disease does not exist.
More research is needed before the Pitt researchers’ new CSF assay can be used by clinical laboratories. Karikari said the next step is developing blood assays for the biomarkers, MedPage Today reported.
New clinical laboratory test could replace conventional spinal tap for diagnosing neurodegenerative disease
In a proof-of-concept study, University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) scientists validated a clinical laboratory test that measures more than 100 different genetic sequences associated with Alzheimer’s disease. The Pitt researchers believe the new diagnostic platform could help clinicians “capture the multifaceted nature of Alzheimer’s pathology and streamline early disease diagnostics,” according to a news release.
Clinical laboratory blood tests that detect biomarkers such as phosphorylated tau protein (pTau) have emerged in studies as diagnostic possibilities for Alzheimer’s disease, which is traditionally diagnosed using a lumbar puncture (spinal tap) procedure.
In their paper, neuroscientist Thomas Karikari, PhD, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at University of Pittsburgh, lead author of the study, and his research team acknowledged that progress has been made in detecting Alzheimer’s disease with blood-based biomarkers. However, they note that “two key obstacles remain: the lack of methods for multi-analyte assessments and the need for biomarkers for related pathophysiological processes like neuroinflammation, vascular, and synaptic dysfunction.”
The Pitt scientists believe the focus on so-called “classical Alzheimer’s blood biomarkers” limits exploration of neurodegenerative disease.
“Alzheimer’s disease should not be looked at through one single lens. Capturing aspects of Alzheimer’s pathology in a panel of clinically validated biomarkers would increase the likelihood of stopping the disease before any cognitive symptoms emerge,” said neuroscientist Thomas Karikari, PhD (above), Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, and lead author of the study in a news release. Should further studies prove Pitt’s research sound, clinical laboratories may have a replacement test for diagnosing neurodegenerative disease. (Photo copyright: University of Pittsburgh.)
On its website, Alamar Biosciences explains that the disease panel offers neurological researchers:
“Multiplexed analysis of 120 neuro-specific and inflammatory proteins from 10 µl of plasma or CSF (cerebrospinal fluid).
Detection of “critical biomarkers—including pTau-217, GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein), NEFL (neurofilament light polypeptide) and alpha-synuclein.”
The NULISAseq test works with “a proprietary sequential immunocomplex capture and release mechanism and the latest advances in next-generation sequencing,” according to the company.
Inside Precision Medicine noted that the Alamar Biosciences assay enabled Pitt scientists to detect:
Biomarkers (usually found in CSF) “correlating with patients’ amyloid positivity status and changes in amyloid burden over time,” and,
Biomarkers including “neuroinflammation, synaptic function, and vascular health, which had not previously been validated in blood samples.”
“The performance of the NULISA platform was independently validated against conventional assays for classic Alzheimer’s biomarkers for each sample. Biomarker profiles over two years were also compared with imaging-based measures of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration,” LabMedica reported.
Opportunity to Track Alzheimer’s
Karikari sees the diagnostic platform being used to track individuals’ blood biomarker changes over time.
In their Molecular Neurodegeneration paper, the Pitt researchers wrote, “These (results) were not limited to markers such as pTau217, p-Tau231, p-Tau181, and GFAP, the elevation of which have consistently shown strong associations with brain Aβ [amyloid beta] and/or tau load, but included novel protein targets that inform about the disease state of the individual in different pathological stages across the biological Alzheimer’s disease continuum.”
About seven million Americans are affected by Alzheimer’s disease, according to the Alzheimer’s Association, which estimated that figure will grow to 13 billion by 2050.
Further studies by Karikari may include larger samples and greater diversity among the people studied, Inside Precision Medicine noted.
“[Karikari’s] lab is developing a predictive model that correlates biomarker changes detected using NULISAseq with brain autopsy data and cognitive assessments collected over the course of several years. Their goal is to identify blood biomarkers that can help stage the disease and predict its progression, both for decision-making around clinical management and treatment plans,” the Pitt news release states.
The Pitt scientists have developed a multiplex test that works with 100 different genetic sequences associated with Alzheimer’s. Such advances in the understanding of the human genome are giving scientists the opportunity to combine newly identified gene sequences that have a role in specific disease states.
In turn, as further studies validate the value of these biomarkers for diagnosing disease and guiding treatment decisions, clinical laboratories will have new assays that deliver more value to referring physicians and their patients.
New non-invasive test could replace traditional painful spinal taps and clinical laboratory fluid analysis for diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease
Scientists at AXIM Biotechnologies of San Diego have added another specimen that can be collected non-invasively for rapid, point-of-care clinical laboratory testing. This time it is tears, and the diagnostic test is for Parkinson’s disease (PD).
The new assay measures abnormal alpha-synuclein (a-synuclein), a protein that is a biomarker for Parkinson’s, according to an AXIM news release which also said the test is the first rapid test for PD.
“The revolutionary nature of AXIM’s new test is that it is non-invasive, inexpensive, and it can be performed at a point of care. It does not require a lumbar puncture, freezing, or sending samples to a lab. AXIM’s assay uses a tiny tear drop versus a spinal tap to collect the fluid sample and the test can be run at a doctor’s office with quantitative results delivered from a reader in less than 10 minutes,” the news release notes.
“Furthermore, emerging evidence shows that a-synuclein assays have the potential to differentiate people with PD from healthy controls, enabling the potential for early identification of at-risk groups,” the news release continues. “These findings suggest a crucial role for a-synuclein in therapeutic development, both in identifying pathologically defined subgroups of people with Parkinson’s disease and establishing biomarker-defined at-risk cohorts.”
This is just the latest example of a disease biomarker that can be collected noninvasively. Other such biomarkers Dark Daily has covered include:
“With this new assay, AXIM has immediately become a stakeholder in the Parkinson’s disease community, and through this breakthrough, we are making possible new paradigms for better clinical care, including earlier screening and diagnosis, targeted treatments, and faster, cheaper drug development,” said John Huemoeller, CEO, AXIM (above), in a news release. Patients benefit from non-invasive clinical laboratory testing. (Photo copyright: AXIM Biotechnologies.)
Fast POC Test versus Schirmer Strip
AXIM said it moved forward with its novel a-synuclein test propelled by earlier tear-related research that found “a-synuclein in its aggregated form can be detected in tears,” Inside Precision Medicine reported.
But that research used what AXIM called the “outdated” Schirmer Strip method to collect tears. The technique involves freezing tear samples at -80 degrees Celsius (-112 Fahrenheit), then sending them to a clinical laboratory for centrifugation for 30 minutes; quantifying tear protein content with a bicinchoninic acid assay, and detecting a-synuclein using a plate reader, AXIM explained.
Alternatively, AXIM says its new test may be performed in doctors’ offices and offers “quantitative results delivered from a reader in less than 10 minutes.”
“Our proven expertise in developing tear-based diagnostic tests has led to the development of this test in record speed, and I’m extremely proud of our scientific team for their ability to expand our science to focus on such an important focus area as Parkinson’s,” said John Huemoeller, CEO, AXIM in the news release.
“This is just the beginning for AXIM in this arena,” he added. “But I am convinced when pharmaceutical companies, foundations, and neurologists see how our solution can better help diagnose Parkinson’s disease in such an expedited and affordable way, we will be at the forefront of PD research, enabling both researchers and clinicians a brand-new tool in the fight against PD.”
One of those tests was “a lateral flow diagnostic for point-of-care use that measures the level of lactoferrin proteins in tear fluid, which work to protect the surface of the eye. … Axim said that low lactoferrin levels have also been linked to Parkinson’s disease and that the assay can be used alongside its alpha-synuclein test,” Fierce Biotech noted.
“It made sense to try and look at the proteinaceous [consisting of or containing protein] constituents of tear fluid,” Lew told Neurology Live. “Tear fluid is easy to collect. It’s noninvasive, inexpensive. It’s not like when you do a lumbar puncture, which is a much more involved ordeal. There’s risk of contamination with blood (saliva is dirty) issues with blood and collection. [Tear fluid analysis] is much safer and less expensive to do.”
In Biomarkers in Medicine, Lew et al noted why tears make good biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease, including “the interconnections between the ocular [eye] surface system and neurons affected in Parkinson’s disease.”
The researchers also highlighted “recent data on the identification of tear biomarkers including oligomeric α-synuclein, associated with neuronal degeneration in PD, in tears of PD patients” and discussed “possible sources for its release into tears.”
Future Clinical Laboratory Testing for Parkinson’s
Parkinson’s disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer’s. It affects nearly one million people in the US. About 1.2 million people may have it by 2030, according to the Parkinson’s Foundation.
Thus, an accurate, inexpensive, non-invasive diagnostic test that can be performed at the point of care, and which returns clinical laboratory test results in less than 10 minutes, will be a boon to physicians who treat PD patients worldwide.
Clinical laboratory managers and pathologists may want to follow AXIM’s future research to see when the diagnostic test may become available for clinical use.
Study findings may lead to new clinical laboratory tests, as well as vaccines and immunotherapies for neurodegenerative diseases
Research into the human genome continues to produce useful new insights. This time, a study led by researchers at Stanford University identified a genetic variation that is believed to help “slow or even stall” progression of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, according to a press release. Because these genetic variations are common, it is likely that diagnostic tests can be developed for use by clinical laboratories.
Researchers at Stanford Medicine led the study which discovered that approximately one in five individuals carry the gene variant, a protective allele identified as DR4 (aka, HLA-DR4). It’s one of a large number of alleles found in a gene known as DRB1.
DRB1 is part of a family of genes collectively known as the human lymphocyte antigen complex or HLA. The HLA-DRB1 gene plays a crucial role in the ability of the immune system to see a cell’s inner contents.
“In an earlier study, we’d found that carrying the DR4 allele seemed to protect against Parkinson’s disease,” said Emmanuel Mignot, MD, PhD (above), Director of the Stanford Center for Narcolepsy, in a Stanford press release. “Now, we’ve found a similar impact of DR4 on Alzheimer’s disease.” Clinical laboratories may soon have new vaccines for both neurodegenerative diseases. (Photo copyright: Stanford University.)
DR4 Found to Impact Both Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s Diseases
To perform their research, the team examined a large collection of medical and genetic databases from 176,000 people who had either Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease. The people involved in the study were from numerous countries located in East Asia, Europe, the Middle East and South America. Their genomes were then compared with people who did not have the diseases, focusing on the incidence and age of onset.
“In an earlier study we’d found that carrying the DR4 allele seemed to protect against Parkinson’s disease,” said Mignot in the Stanford press release. “Now, we’ve found a similar impact of DR4 on Alzheimer’s disease.”
The team found that about 20% to 30% of people carry DR4, and that they have around a 10% risk reduction for developing the two diseases.
“That this protective factor for Parkinson’s wound up having the same protective effect with respect to Alzheimer’s floored me,” said Emmanuel Mignot, MD, PhD, the Craig Reynolds Professor of Sleep Medicine in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University and the Director of the Stanford Center for Narcolepsy, in the Stanford Medicine press release. “The night after we found that out, I couldn’t sleep.”
The scientists also analyzed data from autopsied brains of more than 7,000 Alzheimer’s patients and discovered that individuals who carry DR4 had fewer neurofibrillary tangles and that those tangles are composed mainly of modified tau proteins, a common biomarker for Alzheimer’s.
The presence of these tangles corresponds with the severity of Alzheimer’s disease. They are not typically seen in Parkinson’s patients, but the Stanford team found that Parkinson’s patients who did carry DR4 experienced later onset of symptoms.
Mignot stated that tau, which is essential in Alzheimer’s, may also play a role in Parkinson’s, but that further research is required to prove its function.
Both diseases are characterized by the progressive loss of certain nerve cells or neurons in the brain and are linked to an accumulation of abnormal proteins. The Stanford researchers suggested that the DR4 gene variant may help protect individuals from Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s by preventing the buildup of tau proteins.
“This is a very interesting study, providing additional evidence of the involvement of the immune system in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s,” neurologist Wassim Elyaman, PhD, Assistant Professor of Neurological Sciences in Neurology, the Taub Institute and the Institute for Genomic Medicine at Columbia University, told Live Science.
New Vaccines and Immunotherapies
According to the Alzheimer’s Association, more than six million Americans are currently living with Alzheimer’s disease and approximately one in three Americans die with Alzheimer’s or another dementia.
The Parkinson’s Foundation states that nearly one million Americans are currently living with Parkinson’s disease, and that number is expected to rise to 1.2 million by 2030. Parkinson’s is the second-most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease.
Even though the genetic analysis of the Stanford research is strong, more immune cell and blood-based research is needed to definitively establish how tau is connected to the two diseases.
This research could have implications for clinical laboratories by giving them biomarkers for a useful new diagnostic test, particularly for diagnosing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.
Further, Mignot suggested that an effective vaccine could delay the onset or slow the progression of both diseases. He hopes to test his hypothesis on genetically modified mice and eventually human subjects.
