Lead author of a new study, Ciro Chiappini, PhD, says this new technology could lead to advancements in personalized medicine
Scientists at King’s College London have developed a nanoneedle patch that offers a painless alternative to biopsies that also delivers quicker and more accurate results.
As reported by Phys Org, new research published in Nature Nanotechnology shows that these new patches could be the future of diagnostics. As common as traditional biopsies are, they can be painful and often patients are deterred from follow-ups as well as seeking out treatment and early diagnosis.
“We have been working on nanoneedles for twelve years, but this is our most exciting development yet. It opens a world of possibilities for people with brain cancer, Alzheimer’s, and for advancing personalized medicine. It will allow scientists—and eventually clinicians—to study disease in real time like never before.” said Ciro Chiappini, PhD, senior lecturer at King’s College London and lead author of the study.
The lead author of the study, Ciro Chiappini, PhD, senior lecturer at King’s College London said the new development doesn’t disrupt the cell membrane in a way that cannot be repaired. (Photo copyright: King’s College London)
How it Works
The patches are made up of tens of millions of microscopic needles that are 1,000 times thinner than a human hair and do not remove tissue. This causes no damage and pain while the nanoneedles extract molecular fingerprints from the tissue. The sample is then analyzed using both mass spectrometry and artificial intelligence.
“This approach provides multidimensional molecular information from different types of cells within the same tissue. Traditional biopsies simply cannot do that. And because the process does not destroy the tissue, we can sample the same tissue multiple times, which was previously impossible.” said Chiappini of the process. The study focused on lipids and applied the patch to brain cancer tissue of human origin and mice.
Potential Limitations
Additional reporting by Science News looks into some of the possible drawbacks of the technology.
The patch can’t sample tissue that exists deeper in the body, yet Chiappini says that physicians can use the patch during surgery to get fast results on tissue they are operating on. “It’s very much a surface technology, which is potentially [both] a limitation and a feature,” he says.
Phys Org explained the potential during brain surgery. A surgeon would apply a patch to a “suspicious area” and receive results within 20 minutes, providing the surgical team with impactful information in real-time.
Less Pain, More Gain?
It is no secret that patients will often try to avoid or put off uncomfortable medical procedures like biopsies. This new development is part of an ongoing larger trend—making medical procedures more appealing to encourage higher percentages of patients to seek care and receive treatment. As recently reported by Dark Daily in the article entitled, “University of Texas Study Shows Self-Collection Boosts Cancer Screenings among Women,” a new at-home collection kit to replace a traditional Pap smear may help boost early detection of cervical cancer in women.
This new technology and trend toward less painful procedures suggests that patients will be more inclined to participate in pathology exams if they were less invasive and uncomfortable or painful. Pathology professionals should keep on eye on future developments in this space.
Biopsies are not yet ready to become obsolete, as the patch is still in its early stages and more research is needed.
Genetic test that analyzes DNA to identify men at greatest risk for developing the disease could become common clinical laboratory screen for cancer
Researchers in the UK believe a common spit test can be more accurate at determining which men are more likely to develop prostate cancer than the clinical laboratory prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test currently used by the National Health Service (NHS) for that diagnosis.
During a recent study, scientists at the Institute of Cancer Research, London (ICR), found that germline DNA extracted from saliva, which was then used to derive polygenic risk scores for cancer, resulted in a higher percentage of participants “found to have clinically significant disease” than the percentage that would have been identified with the use of PSA or MRI.
The salvia test works by analyzing men’s DNA to find out if they are genetically pre-disposed to developing the disease. Men who find out they are likely to develop prostate cancer can then pursue further testing and scans.
“The test assesses 130 genetic variants to provide a risk score for prostate cancer, which is the second most common cause of cancer deaths in men in the UK,” The Guardian reported.
The study found that 187 of the men in the study had prostate cancer. According to the American Cancer Society, one in eight men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in their lifetime.
“We can identify men at risk of aggressive cancers who need further tests and spare the men who are at lower risk from unnecessary treatments,” said study leader Rosalind Eeles, PhD, of the ICR London, in The Guardian.
“With this test, it could be possible to turn the tide on prostate cancer,” Rosalind Eeles, PhD, of the Institute of Cancer Research, London, told the BBC. (Photo copyright: Prostate Cancer UK.)
Landmark Discovery
Michael Inouye, PhD, professor of systems genomics and population health at the University of Cambridge, told the BBC that researchers will look back on this study “as a landmark.” He also acknowledged that it would be a long road before widespread implementation of the test.
While some sources call the ICR’s test promising, they also acknowledge it may only have a modest effect and that there may be possible racial disparities in the findings. The study was primarily based on people with European ancestry. According to Prostate Cancer UK, black men in the UK have double the risk of developing the disease. A similar trend can be observed in the US, Statistica reported.
Dusko Ilic, PhD, professor in stem cell sciences at King’s College London, told the BBC that there was “no direct evidence” of these findings having an effect on survival or quality of life. He stressed the need for more studies to better assess the value of the test.
The salvia test is expected to be included in Prostate Cancer UK’s TRANSFORM trial, a $58 million research program partly funded by the NHS to determine the best way to screen for cancer in the UK.
Effect on Clinical Pathologists
Prostate cancer is expected to surge in the US over the next 15 years, according to UC Davis Health. Thus, pathologists should expect more men to seek ways to assess their risk. Pathologists would be wise to educate themselves fully on new and emerging tests and tools to best meet the needs of their patients.
Given the publicity generated by former President Biden’s announcement that he has an advanced case of prostate cancer, clinical laboratories should also expect more patients to request diagnostic tests that either screen for or confirm the presence of the disease.
Bacteria could become new biomarker for testing patients’ reaction to cancer treatments which would give microbiologists and clinical laboratories a new tool for aiding diagnosis and in the selection of appropriate therapies
In a surprising study conducted at King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, British scientists have discovered that a common bacteria found in the mouth may be able to “melt” certain cancers. The bacteria could also be used as a clinical laboratory biomarker to determine how patients may react to specific cancer treatments.
The researchers found that the presence of Fusobacterium can help neutralize head and neck cancers and provide better outcomes in patients with those diseases, according to a Kings College London news release.
“In essence, we found that when you find these bacteria within head and neck cancers, [patients] have much better outcomes,” said Miguel Reis Ferreira, MD, PhD, clinical oncologist at Guy’s and St Thomas’, adjunct senior clinical lecturer at King’s College London and senior author of the study, in the news release. “The other thing that we found is that in cell cultures this bacterium is capable of killing cancer.”
“This research reveals that these bacteria play a more complex role than previously known in their relationship with cancer—that they essentially melt head and neck cancer cells,” said Miguel Reis Ferreira, MD, PhD (above), clinical oncologist at Guy’s and St Thomas’, adjunct senior clinical lecturer at King’s College London and senior author of the study, in a news release. “However, this finding should be balanced by their known role in making cancers such as those in the bowel get worse.” Should these findings prove sound, clinical laboratories may soon have a new biomarker for testing patients’ reaction to cancer treatments. (Photo copyright: King’s College London.)
Researchers Surprised by Their Findings
The researchers began their research by using computer modeling to identify the types of bacteria to further scrutinize. They then studied the effect of those bacteria on cancer cells by analyzing data on 155 head and neck cancer patients whose tumor information had been submitted to the Cancer Genome Atlas. Head and neck cancers include cancers of the mouth, throat, voice box, nose, and sinuses.
The scientists placed Fusobacterium in petri dishes and kept the bacteria there for a few days. They observed the effect of that bacteria on head and neck cancers and discovered there was a 70% to 90% reduction in the number of viable cancer cells after being infused with the Fusobacterium.
Due to the known correlation between Fusobacterium and colorectal cancer, the team was astonished to find the cancer cells present in head and neck cancers had almost been eradicated.
In the news release, Ferreira said the researchers initially expected the Fusobacterium to boost the growth of the cancers and render those cancers more resistant to treatments like radiotherapy. However, they found the opposite to be true.
“The research in colorectal cancer indicates that these bacteria are bad, and that was kind of ingrained into our minds, and we were expecting to find the same thing,” said Ferreira in a Press Association (PA) interview, The Independent reported. “When we started finding things the other way around, we were brutally surprised.”
Predicting Better Outcomes, Lower Risk of Death
“You put it in the cancer at very low quantities and it just starts killing it very quickly,” Ferreira said in the King’s College London news release. “What we’re finding is that this little bug is causing a better outcome based on something that it’s doing inside the cancer. So we are looking for that mechanism at present, and it should be the theme for a new paper in the very short-term future.”
In addition, the scientists discovered that patients with Fusobacterium within their cancer showed improved survival rates when compared to those without the bacteria. The presence of the bacteria correlated with a 65% reduction in death risk.
“What it could mean is that we can use these bacteria to better predict which patients are more likely to have good or worse outcomes, and based on that, we could change their treatment to make it kinder in the patients that have better outcomes or make it more intense in patients that are more likely to have their cancers come back,” said Ferreira in the PA interview.
“Our findings are remarkable and very surprising. We had a eureka moment when we found that our international colleagues also found data that validated the discovery,” said Anjali Chander, PhD student, senior clinical research fellow, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King’s College London, and lead author of the study in the news release.
More to Learn about Bacteria as Biomarkers
According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), more than 71,000 people will be diagnosed with one of the major types of head and neck cancer this year in the US and more than 16,000 patients will die from these diseases.
The Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) estimates there are about 900,000 new cases of head and neck cancers diagnosed annually worldwide with approximately 450,000 deaths attributed to those cancers every year. GLOBOCAN also claims head and neck cancers are the seventh most common cancer globally.
More research and studies are needed to confirm the virtue of this latest venture into the human microbiome. However, the preliminary results of this study appear promising.
The study of human microbiota continues to bring unexpected surprises, as scientists gain more insights and identify specific strains of bacteria that may have a positive or negative influence on an individual’s health. These discoveries may give microbiologists and clinical laboratories intriguing new biomarkers that could be incorporated into medical tests that aid diagnosis and the selection of appropriate therapies.
Findings are ‘a vital first step in discovering potentially valuable targets for development of new [COVID-19] treatments,’ noted co-first author of the study
Researchers at King’s College London (KCL) have determined that levels of certain blood proteins specific to each person’s blood type can be “causally linked” to an increased risk of hospitalization and death from a COVID-19 infection. The scientists also found that a person’s genetics play a key role in establishing the levels of those proteins in the blood.
This is relevant for clinical laboratories—particularly hospital/health system laboratories—because testing for specific proteins in the blood by medical laboratories could help flag incoming patients at higher risk for an acute COVID-19 infection.
Also, “By identifying this suite of proteins, the research has highlighted a number [of] possible targets for drugs that could be used to help treat severe COVID-19,” noted a KCL news release.
Identifying certain drugs that would be more effective for specific individuals or healthcare groups is a core goal of precision medicine.
“We have used a purely genetic approach to investigate a large number of blood proteins and established that a handful have causal links to the development of severe COVID-19,” said Alish Palmos, PhD (above), Postdoctoral Research Associate, King’s College London Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Center, and co-first author of the study. “Honing in on this group of proteins is a vital first step in discovering potentially valuable targets for development of new treatments.” Medical laboratories may soon be able to use this knowledge as a way to determine risk for severe COVID-19 hospitalization, as well as to guide decisions on how to use new precision medicine drugs for combating the infection. (Photo copyright: Twitter.)
Genetic Variants Linked to Causality
Since the COVID-19 pandemic began in late 2019, scientists and researchers have been vigorously trying to understand the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and determine why some patients have more severe symptoms than others.
To conduct their study, the KCL researchers screened more than 3,000 blood proteins to identify which proteins have a causal link to hospitalization risk, the need for respiratory support, and death from a severe COVID-19 infection.
“Causality between exposure and disease can be established because genetic variants inherited from parent to offspring are randomly assigned at conception similar to how a randomized controlled trial assigns people to groups,” said Vincent Millischer, MD, PhD, Medical University of Vienna and co-first author of the study in the KCL news release.
“In our study, the groups are defined by their genetic propensity to different blood protein levels, allowing an assessment of causal direction from high blood protein levels to COVID-19 severity whilst avoiding influence of environmental effects,” he added.
The scientists selected genetic variants, known as single nucleotide polymorphisms, that were strongly associated with blood protein levels. They then performed their analysis using Mendelian randomization to test the causal associations of those blood proteins with the development of severe COVID-19 infections.
“Mendelian randomization uses genetic variants associated with a trait [e.g., protein level] and measures their causal effect on disease outcomes, [avoiding] environmental confounding factors, such as lifestyle, being physically ill, etc.,” Alish Palmos, PhD, told Medical News Today. Palmos is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at King’s College London’s Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Center and co-first author of the study.
Blood Groups Linked to COVID-19 Hospitalization, Death
One of the most important findings of the KCL research is a causal association between COVID-19 severity and an enzyme called ABO, which determines blood type. This discovery suggests that blood groups perform an instrumental role in whether individuals develop severe forms of the illness.
“The enzyme helps determine the blood group of an individual and our study has linked it with both risk of hospitalization and the need of respiratory support or death,” said Christopher Hübel, PhD, Postdoctoral Research Associate, King’s College and co-last author of the study in the press release. “Our study does not link precise blood group with risk of severe COVID-19, but since previous research has found that proportion of people who are group A is higher in COVID-19 positive individuals, this suggests that blood group A is more likely candidate for follow-up studies.”
The KCL researchers uncovered several compelling findings regarding blood proteins and COVID-19, including:
The discovery of six blood markers that were significantly associated with an elevated risk of hospitalization.
The discovery of nine blood markers that were significantly associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization.
Consistent results indicating hospitalization being significantly associated with decreased levels of macrophage inflammatory protein.
Five blood markers associated with the need for respiratory support or death.
Eight blood markers causally associated with a statistically significantly decreased risk of need for respiratory support or death.
Consistent results with respiratory support or death being significantly causally associated with decreased levels of neprilysin.
Developing New COVID-19 Treatments and Preventative Therapies
“What we have done in our study is provide a shortlist for the next stage of research,” said Gerome Breen, PhD, in the KCL news release. Breen is Professor of Psychiatric Genetics at King’s College London’s Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, and co-last author of the study.
“Out of 1000s of blood proteins we have whittled it down to about 14 that have some form of causal connection to the risk of severe COVID-19 and present a potentially important avenue for further research to better understand the mechanisms behind COVID-19 with an ultimate aim of developing new treatments but potentially also preventative therapies,” he added.
Further research and clinical investigation are needed to validate the King’s College London researchers’ findings. However, their insights could result in new clinical laboratory tests and personalized treatments for COVID-19.
One key finding of interest to clinical laboratory scientists is that this research study indicates that the human microbiome may more closely correlate with blood markers of metabolic disease than the genome of individuals
In the search for more sensitive diagnostic biomarkers (meaning the ability to detect disease with smaller samples and smaller quantities of the target biomarker), an international team of researchers has teased out a finding that a panel of multiple biomarkers in the human microbiome is more closely correlated with metabolic disease than genetic markers.
The team also discovered that the foods an individual ate had a more powerful impact on their microbiomes than their genes. The study participants included several sets of identical twins. The researchers found that identical twins shared only about 34% of the same gut microbes. People who were unrelated shared 30% of the same gut microbes.
This is a fascinating insight for pathologists and microbiologists involved in the study of the human microbiome for use in development of precision medicine clinical laboratory testing and drug therapies.
Microbiome Markers for Obesity, Heart Disease, and More
The study began in 2018, when an international team of researchers analyzed the gut microbiomes, diets, and blood biomarkers for cardiometabolic health obtained from 1,100 mostly healthy adults in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US). They collected blood samples from the participants before and after meals to examine blood sugar levels, hormones, cholesterol, and inflammation levels. Sleep and activity levels also were monitored. Participants had to wear a continuous glucose monitor for two weeks during the research period.
The scientists discovered that the composition of a healthy gut microbiome is strongly linked to certain foods, food groups, nutrients, and diet composition. They identified markers for obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, and cardiovascular disease in the gut bacteria.
“When you eat, you’re not just nourishing your body, you’re feeding the trillions of microbes that live inside your gut,” genetic epidemiologist Tim Spector, MD, FmedSCi, told Labroots. Spector is a professor of genetic epidemiology at King’s College London and one of the authors of the study.
The scientists found that a diet rich in nutrient-dense, whole foods was more beneficial to a healthy gut microbiome, which can be an indicator of good health. Individuals who ate minimally processed foods, such as vegetables, nuts, eggs, and seafood were more likely to have healthy gut bacteria than individuals who consumed large amounts of highly processed foods, like juices and other sweetened beverages, processed meats, and refined grains and foods that were high in added sugars and salt.
“It goes back to the age-old message of eating as many whole and unprocessed foods as possible,” Sarah Berry, PhD, a nutrition scientist at King’s College London and a co-author of the study told The New York Times. “What this research shows for the first time is the link between the quality of the food we’re eating, the quality of our microbiomes, and ultimately our health outcomes,” she added.
The researchers concluded that heavily processed foods tend to contain very minimal amounts of fiber, a macronutrient that helps promote good bacteria in the gut microbiome and leads to better metabolic and cardiovascular health.
They found that people who had healthy blood sugar levels following a meal had higher levels of good bacteria called Prevotella copri, a genus of gram-negative bacteria, and Blastocystis, a genus of single-celled heterokont parasites, present in their guts. These bacteria are associated with lower levels of visceral fat, which accumulates around internal organs and increases risk of heart disease.
These “good” microbes also are affiliated with lower levels of inflammation, better blood sugar control, and lower spikes in blood fat and cholesterol levels after meals.
“We were surprised to see such large, clear groups of what we informally call ‘good’ and ‘bad’ microbes emerging from our analysis,” Nicola Segata, PhD (above), told News Medical. Segata is a professor and principal investigator at the Computational Metagenomics Lab at the University of Trento in Italy, and co-author of the study. “It is also exciting to see that microbiologists know so little about many of these microbes that they are not even named yet. This is now a big area of focus for us, as we believe they may open new insights in the future into how we could use the gut microbiome as a modifiable target to improve human metabolism and health,” he added. Pathologists and clinical laboratory scientists who read Dark Daily are already familiar with the plethora of ways the human microbiome is being studied for use in diagnostic testing and drug therapy. (Photo copyright: University of Trento.)
The study also found that different people have wildly varying metabolic responses to the same foods, partially due to the types of bacteria residing in their gut microbiome. The consumption of some foods is better for overall health than other foods, but there is no definitive, one-size-fits-all diet that works for everyone.
“What we found in our study was that the same diet in two different individuals does not lead to the same microbiome, and it does not lead to the same metabolic response. There is a lot of variation,” Andrew Chan, MD, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, told The New York Times. Chan is also Chief of the Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital and co-author of the study.
Small Changes in Diet, Big Impact to Health
The team is now planning a clinical trial to test whether changes in diet can alter levels of good and bad microbes in the gut. If proven to be true, such information could help clinicians design personalized nutritional plans that would enable individuals to improve their gut microbiome and their overall health.
“As a nutritional scientist, finding novel microbes that are linked to specific foods, as well as metabolic health, is exciting,” Berry told News Medical. “Given the highly personalized composition of each individual’s microbiome, our research suggests that we may be able to modify our gut microbiome to optimize our health by choosing the best foods for our unique biology.
“We think there are lots of small changes that people can make that can have a big impact on their health that might be mediated through the microbiome,” Berry told The New York Times.
More research and clinical trials are needed before diagnostic tests that use microbiome biomarkers to detect metabolic diseases can be developed. But these early research findings are a sign to pathologists and clinical laboratory managers that microbiome-based assays may come to play a more significant role in the early detection of several metabolic diseases.
