News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel
Sign In

Does Giving a Patient a $75 Gift Card to Send in a Clinical Laboratory Test Specimen Violate Federal Fraud Laws? A Whistleblower Lawsuit Argues ‘Yes!’

Novel scheme by medical laboratory company to induce patients to collect and return their own specimen for testing is central to a federal whistleblower case alleging violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute

Handing out gift cards only to patients who return a specimen to a clinical laboratory company for colorectal cancer screening is a unique approach that is now at the center of a federal qui tamcase filed by a retired Indiana pathologist.

The defendant in this whistleblower lawsuit is Exact Sciences Laboratories and its parent company Exact Sciences Corporation (NASDAQ:EXAS). Last month, a federal judge ruled the court case will proceed following attempts by the defendant’s attorneys to have the case dismissed.

The plaintiffs (United States of America ex rel. Niles Rosen, MD) allege Exact Sciences Laboratories violated the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and False Claims Act by offering $75 gift cards to induce patients to return self-collected fecal samples for the lab’s Cologuard at-home colon cancer screening kit through its Patient Compliance Program. 

Exact Sciences refuted the allegations and moved to have the case dismissed claiming it “had a good faith belief that its [Patient Compliance Program] complied with the law and thus lacked the requisite intent for a violation of the AKS,” according to court documents. The court denied Exact Sciences’ motion to dismiss.

Brian Boynton, JD

“We are grateful for the hard work and courage of those private citizens who bring evidence of fraud to the Department’s attention, often putting at risk their careers and reputations,” said Brian Boynton, JD (above), Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General and head of the federal Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division in a February 7, 2023, DOJ statement. “Our ability to protect citizens and taxpayer funds continues to benefit greatly from their actions.” Clinical laboratory managers will want to follow this and other qui tam cases claiming violation of anti-kickback laws. (Photo copyright: Department of Justice.)

.

Was Exact Sciences’ Patient Compliance Program a Kickback?

Cologuard is a non-invasive testing kit utilized by people to screen for colorectal cancer in the privacy of their own homes. It is intended for those over the age of 45 who are at low or average risk for the disease. Exact Sciences regularly runs television advertisements urging individuals to be screened for colorectal cancer using the Cologuard test.

Following a physician’s order, and after receiving the testing kit in the mail, individuals collect a stool sample using the specimen container in the kit and return the sample to Exact Sciences Laboratories (ESL) for analysis. The test works by looking for certain DNA markers and blood in the stool sample. 

According to Report on Medicare Compliance from the Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA), in 2017, a gastroenterologist ordered the Cologuard kit for Rosen, the whistleblower, but Rosen chose not to return a stool sample to ESL. A few months later, ESL sent Rosen a letter offering him a $75 Visa gift card if he performed the at-home specimen collection and then returned it to ESL by March 22, 2018. Persuaded by the offer, Rosen collected a sample, returned it to ESL, and received the gift card. 

As part of its Patient Compliance Program, ESL analyzed Rosen’s sample and received $499 from Medicare for performing the test. The complaint filed against Exact Sciences states Medicare paid Exact Sciences more than $160 million for a total of 334,424 Cologuard tests in 2018 while the company offered “unlawful cash equivalent inducements directly to Medicare beneficiaries,” COSMOS reported.

“It was a straight-up kickback,” Rosen’s attorney Marlan Wilbanks, JD, Senior Partner at Atlanta law firm Wilbanks and Gouinlock, told COSMOS. “You can’t offer cash or cash equivalents to anyone to induce them to use a government service.”

DOJ Elects to Not Intervene in Lawsuit

In February 2020, Exact Sciences received a civil investigation demand by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding the gift card incentive. The DOJ later filed a notice that it had elected to decline intervention in the lawsuit. This action did not prevent Rosen from continuing with the lawsuit. Accordingly, in April of 2021, he filed an amended complaint against Exact Sciences alleging violations of the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act. 

Rosen is seeking a monetary award for himself, and on behalf of the US government, for civil penalties, treble damages, fees, and costs. 

According to Report on Medicare Compliance, Exact Sciences “refuted the allegations and asserted, among other things, that the arrangement qualifies for the preventive care safe harbor to the anti-kickback statute (AKS) and that the complaint fails for many reasons.”

Exact Sciences also noted in its motion to dismiss that “encouraging a patient to have a medical service that was already ordered by a provider isn’t an inducement under the AKS.”  

At this time, the case remains unresolved and continues in federal court.

DOJ Recovers Billions of Taxpayer Dollars from AKS Violations

A qui tam lawsuit or action is a method available for individuals to help the government circumvent fraud and recover money for taxpayers. Types of fraud included in these cases often pertain to Medicare and Medicaid services, defense contractor fraud, and procurement fraud.

According to the DOJ, over $1.9 billion was recovered as a result of qui tam lawsuits pursued by either the government or whistleblowers during fiscal year 2022. The number of these types of lawsuits has increased dramatically over the years with a total of 652 qui tam cases filed in 2022 alone.

Thus, clinical laboratory professionals should be aware that this type of novel scheme to generate more patients could possibly lead to legal issues. Dark Daily would like to credit Laboratory Economics for calling attention to this fascinating case of alleged illegal inducement involving a medical laboratory company. 

—JP Schlingman

Related Information:

Legal Corner: Niles Rosen v Exact Sciences

FCA Lawsuit Over Patient Gift Cards Survives Motion to Dismiss

United States of America ex rel. Niles Rosen, MD, v. Plaintiff, Exact Sciences Corporation and Exact Sciences Laboratories, LLC [motion to dismiss]

United States of America ex rel. Niles Rosen, MD, v. Plaintiff, Exact Sciences Corporation and Exact Sciences Laboratories, LLC [entry of an order staying discovery]

Report on Medicare Compliance

False Claims Act Settlements and Judgments Exceed $2 Billion in Fiscal Year 2022

IRS Expands Preventive Care Benefits Under High Deductible Health Plans

What Is Colorectal Cancer?

HHS: Fraud and Abuse Laws

Medicare and State Health Care Programs: Fraud and Abuse; Revisions to the Safe Harbors Under the Anti-Kickback Statute and Civil Monetary Penalty Rules Regarding Beneficiary Inducements

What It Means to Be a Clinical Laboratory Whistleblower Outlined in Newly Released ‘Tell-All’ Book by Lab Executive Chris Riedel

Biodiagnostic Laboratory Services Leaders Sentenced to Prison in $100-Million Lab Test Kickback Scheme That Also Led to Convictions of 38 Physicians

Federal EKRA Law Continues to Cause Uncertainty in Clinical Laboratory Sales Compliance

Healthcare attorneys advise medical laboratory leaders to ensure staff understand difference between EKRA and other federal fraud laws, such as the Anti-kickback Statute

More than four years have passed since Congress passed the law and yet the Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act of 2018 (EKRA) continues to cause anxiety and confusion. In particular are the differences in the safe harbors between the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and Stark Law versus EKRA. This creates uncertainty among clinical laboratory leaders as they try to understand how these disparate federal laws affect business referrals for medical testing.

According to a news alert from Tampa Bay, Florida-based law firm, Holland and Knight, “EKRA was enacted as part of comprehensive legislation designed to address the opioid crisis and fraudulent practices occurring in the sober home industry.” However, “In the four years since EKRA’s enactment, US Department of Justice (DOJ) enforcement actions have broadened EKRA’s scope beyond reducing fraud in the addiction treatment industry to include all clinical laboratory activities, including COVID-19 testing.”

It is important that medical laboratory leaders understand this law. New cases are showing up and it would be wise for clinical laboratory managers to review their EKRA/AKS/Stark Law compliance with their legal counsels.

David Gee

“Keeping in mind that [EKRA is] a criminal statute, clinical laboratories need to take steps to demonstrate that they’re not intending to break the law,” said attorney David Gee, a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine, in an exclusive interview with The Dark Report. “[Lab leaders should] think about what they can do to make their sales compensation program avoid the things the government has had such a problem with, even if they’re not sure exactly how to compensate under the language of EKRA or how they’re supposed to develop a useful incentive compensation plan when they can’t pay commissions.” David Gee will be speaking about laboratory regulations and compliance at the upcoming Executive War College in New Orleans on April 25-26, 2023. (Photo copyright: Davis Wright Tremaine.)

How Does EKRA Affect Clinical Laboratories?

The federal EKRA statute—originally enacted to address healthcare fraud in addiction treatment facilities—was “expansively drafted to also apply to clinical laboratories,” according to New York-based law firm, Epstein Becker and Green. As such, EKRA “applies to improper referrals for any ‘service,’ regardless of the payor. … public as well as private insurance plans, and even self-pay patients, fall within the reach of the statute.”

In “Revised Stark Law, Anti-Kickback Statute Rules Are Good News for Labs,” Dark Daily’s sister publication The Dark Report noted that EKRA creates criminal penalties for any individual who solicits or receives any remuneration for referring a patient to a recovery home, clinical treatment facility, or clinical laboratory, or who pays or offers any remuneration to induce a referral.

According to Epstein Becker and Green, EKRA:

  • Applies to clinical laboratories, not just toxicology labs.
  • Has relevance to all payers: Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance plans, and self-pay.
  • Is a criminal statute with “extreme penalties” such as 10 years in prison and $200,000 fine per occurrence.
  • Exceptions are not concurrent with AKS.
  • Areas being scrutinized include COVID-19 testing, toxicology, allergy, cardiac, and genetic tests.

“For many clinical laboratories, a single enforcement action could have a disastrous effect on their business. And unlike other healthcare fraud and abuse statutes, such as the AKA, exceptions are very limited,” Epstein Becker and Green legal experts noted.

“Therefore, a lab could potentially find itself protected under an AKS safe harbor and still potentially be in violation of EKRA,” they continued. “The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the DOJ have not provided any clarity regarding this statute (EKRA). Without this much needed guidance clinical laboratories have been left wondering what they need to do to avoid liability.”

EKRA versus AKS and Stark Law

HHS compared AKS and the Stark Law (but not EKRA) by noting on its website prohibition, penalties, exceptions, and applicable federal healthcare programs for each federal law: 

  • AKS has criminal fines of up to $25,000 per violation and up to a five-year prison term, as well as civil penalties.
  • The Stark Law has civil penalties only.
  • AKS prohibits anyone from “offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving anything of value to induce or reward referrals or generate federal healthcare program business.”
  • The Stark Law addresses referrals from physicians and prohibits the doctors “from referring Medicare patients for designated health services to an entity with which the physician has a financial relationship.”

EKRA is more restrictive than AKS, as it prohibits some compensation that AKS allows, healthcare attorney Emily Johnson of McDonald Hopkins in Chicago told The Dark Report.

“Specifically, AKS includes a safe harbor for bona fide employees that gives an employer wide discretion in how employees are paid, including permitting percentage-based compensation,” Johnson wrote in a Dark Daily Coding, Billing, and Collections Special Report, titled, “Getting Paid for COVID-19 Test Claims: What Every Clinical Lab Needs to Know to Maximize Collected Dollars.”  

EKRA Cases May Inform Clinical Laboratory Leaders

Recent enforcement actions may help lab leaders better understand EKRA’s reach. According to Holland and Knight:

  • Malena Lepetich of Belle Isle, Louisiana, owner and CEO of MedLogic LLC in Baton Rouge, was indicted in a $15 million healthcare fraud scheme for “allegedly offering to pay kickbacks for COVID-19 specimens and respiratory pathogen testing.”
  • In S-G Labs Hawaii, LLC v. Graves, a federal court concluded the laboratory recruiter’s contract “did not violate EKRA because the recruiter was not referring individual patients but rather marketing to doctors. According to the court, EKRA only prohibits percentage-based compensation to marketers based on direct patient referrals.”
  • In another federal case, United States v. Mark Schena, the court’s rule on prohibition of direct and indirect referrals of patients to clinical labs sent a strong signal “that EKRA most likely prohibits clinical laboratories from paying their marketers percentage-based compensation, regardless of whether the marketer targets doctors or prospective patients.”

What can medical laboratory leaders do to ensure compliance with the EKRA law?

In EKRA Compliance, Law and Regulations for 2023, Dallas law firm Oberheiden P.C., advised clinical laboratories (as well as recovery homes and clinical treatment facilities) to have EKRA policies and procedure in place, and to reach out to staff (employed and contracted) to build awareness of statute prohibitions and risks of non-compliance.

One other useful resource for clinical laboratory executives and pathologists with management oversight of their labs’ marketing and sales programs is the upcoming Executive War College on Diagnostics, Clinical Laboratory, and Pathology Management. The conference takes place on April 25-26, 2023, at the Hyatt Regency in New Orleans. A panel of attorneys with deep experience in lab law and compliance will discuss issues associated with EKRA, the Anti-Kickback Statutes, and the Stark self-referral law. 

Donna Marie Pocius

Related Information:

The State of EKRA

Four Years After EKRA: Reminders for Clinical Laboratories

Revised Stark Law and AKS Rules Are Good News for Labs

Comparison of the Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law

Getting Paid for COVID-19 Test Claims: What Every Clinical Lab Needs to Know to Maximize Collected Dollars

EKRA Compliance, Law and Regulations for 2023

Preparing Clinical Laboratories for Invasive Federal Enforcement of Fraud and Abuse Laws, Increased Scrutiny by Private Payers, New Education Audits, and More

Medical laboratory leaders need to take opportunities to stay abreast of government and payer activity, particularly as payer audits become tougher, say legal experts

Even compliant clinical laboratories and anatomic pathology groups are reporting tougher audits and closer scrutiny of the medical lab test claims they submit for payment. This is an unwelcome development at a time when falling lab test prices, narrowing networks, and more prior-authorization requirements are already making it tough for labs to get paid for the tests they perform.

Clinical laboratory leaders can expect continued scrutiny of their labs’ operations and financials as government and commercial payers move forward with invasive programs and policies designed to ferret out fraud and bad actors.

Federal officials are focusing their investigations on healthcare providers who mismanage or inappropriately use Medicare and Medicaid programs, while commercial payers are closely scrutinizing areas such as genetic testing prior authorization, say healthcare attorneys with Cleveland Ohio-based McDonald Hopkins, LLC.

“The government is looking at fraud, waste, and abuse, and all the different ways they come into play,” said Elizabeth Sullivan, Esq., a Member and Co-Chair of the firm’s Healthcare Practice Group, in an exclusive interview with Dark Daily. “We anticipate there will be more enforcement [of fraud and abuse laws] centered around different issues—anything that can be a false claim.”

Specifically, government officials will key in on violations of the Stark Law, EKRA (the Eliminating Kickback in Recovery Act of 2018), and other anti-kickback statutes and laws, Sullivan said.

“And clinical laboratories, by virtue of the type of services and service arrangements they offer, will continue to be a target,” she added.

Medical laboratory leaders also must prepare for aggressive tactics by insurance companies. “On the commercial side, payers are getting more aggressive and more willing to take things to ligation if they don’t get what they want and don’t see a settlement that satisfies their concerns over issues,” said Courtney Tito, Esq., also a Member with McDonald Hopkins, in the Dark Daily interview. 

Current Investigations Likely to Impact Clinical Laboratories

Sullivan and Tito advise clinical labs to be aware of the following issues being fast-tracked by government and private payers:

The TPE audits program, according to CMS, is focused on providers with high claim error rates or unusual billing practices. During a TPE, a Medicare administrative contractor (MAC) works with a provider to identify and correct errors.

“The TPE audits are real hot right now. We are seeing a lot of clients go through this,” Tito said.

Feds Crack Down on Genetic Testing Fraud Schemes

Genetic testing is another “hot button” issue for enforcement by government and private payers, Sullivan and Tito state.

In fact, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in September announced charges against 35 people including nine physicians for allegedly participating in healthcare fraud schemes involving genetic cancer testing of seniors nationwide, states a DOJ news release.

CMS is taking action against testing companies and practitioners who submitted more than $1.7 billion in claims to Medicare, the statement added.

The scheme involved medical laboratories conducting the genetic tests, McDonald Hopkins noted in an Alert about the DOJ investigation. The alert described how the scam operated:

  • Scam recruiters approached Medicare beneficiaries at health fairs;
  • In exchange for a DNA sample (in the form of a cheek swab) and a copy of the victim’s driver’s license, the “representative” offered a free genetic test;
  • Representatives allegedly asked the seniors’ doctors to sign-off on test orders. If the seniors’ physicians refused, the scammers offered kickbacks to doctors already in their group;
  • Clinical laboratories that performed the tests were reimbursed from Medicare and, allegedly, shared the proceeds with the scammers.

“Although these opportunities may seem appealing as an additional revenue source for providers, it is always important to review the regulatory requirements as well as the potential anti-kickback statute and Stark implications for any new arrangement,” Sullivan and Tito wrote in the McDonald Hopkins Alert article. 

Criminal Behavior in CMS Programs

Effective Nov. 4, 2019, CMS issued a final rule intended to stop fraud before it happens by keeping “unscrupulous providers” out of the federal healthcare programs in the first place, states a CMS news release.

The rule (CMS-6058-FC), called “Program Integrity Enhancements to the Provider Enrollment Process,” has new revocation and denial authorities to stop waste, fraud, and abuse, the news release points out.

Reasons CMS can revoke or deny enrollment to providers, according to another McDonald Hopkins Alert, include:

  • Outstanding debt to CMS following overpayment to the provider;
  • Coming back into CMS programs with a new identity;
  • Billing for services from non-compliant locations;
  • Abusive ordering or certifying under Medicare Part A or Medicare Part B.

Additionally, EKRA establishes “criminal penalties for unlawful payments for referrals to recovery homes and clinical treatment facilities,” Dark Daily recently reported. However, as the e-briefing points out, it is unclear whether EKRA applies to clinical laboratories.

Nevertheless, Sullivan points out that, “Even without EKRA, the anti-kickback statute applies to any arrangement between individuals. And, it is good to have an attorney look at those arrangements. What your sales reps are doing in the field, how they are communicating, and their practices warrant oversight. EKRA just makes it all the more important.”

During an upcoming Dark Daily webinar, attorneys Elizabeth Sullivan (left) and Courtney Tito (right) of McDonald Hopkins, LLC, will advise clinical laboratory leaders and financial staff on how to prepare for future aggressive payer audits, rigid enforcement of fraud and abuse laws, and more. (Photos copyright: LinkedIn/Dark Daily.)

Clinical Laboratories Need Compliance Plan, Focus on Payers

With so many legal requirements and payer programs, Sullivan advises medical labs and pathology group practices to work with resources they trust and to have a compliance plan at the ready. “Have resources in place, including but not limited to a compliance officer, a committee, and someone who is spending time on these issues. Monitoring government enforcement and payer activity is the most critical,” she said.

To assist labs in remaining fully informed on these critical compliance topics, and the federal government’s latest legislation to combat fraud, Dark Daily is offering a webinar on November 20th at 1pm Eastern time. Sullivan and Tito will offer their insights and advice on how labs should prepare for CMS’ battle to reign in fraud and commercial payers’ increased scrutiny into prior authorizations.

Clinical laboratory leaders, compliance officers, and finance staff will benefit greatly from this crucial resource.

Register for “Bracing for Aggressive Payer Audits, Rigid Enforcement of Fraud and Abuse Laws, and More” at https://www.darkdaily.com/product/payor-audits-webinar/ or by calling 512-264-7103.

—Donna Marie Pocius

Related Information:

Dark Daily Webinar: What Lab Leaders Need to Know About How to Prepare for 2020: Bracing for Aggressive Payer Audits, Rigid Enforcement of Fraud and Abuse Laws, and More

Federal Law Enforcement Action Involving Fraudulent Genetic Testing Results in Charges Against 35 Individuals Responsible for Over $2.1 Billion in Losses is One of the Largest Healthcare Fraud Schemes Ever Charged

OIG Focusing on Laboratories Involved in Genetic Testing Scams

CMS Announces New Enforcement Authorities Reduce Criminal Behavior in Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP

CMS Aims to Combat Criminal Behavior Through Enrollment Process

Does New Opioid Law Require Clinical Laboratories to Change How They Pay Sales Employees?

Federal Investigations into Alleged Kickback Schemes between Hospitals and Physicians Increase in Number and Scope

Hospitals and other organizations are finding ways to pay physicians for referrals in ways that don’t always look like kickbacks

Hospitals nationwide are being scrutinized by the federal Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for allegedly violating federal anti-kickback statutes. This will be of interest to clinical pathology laboratories that have been under a similar spotlight for various referral-kickback schemes and arrangements in the last few years, which Dark Daily repeatedly covered.

Kaiser Health News (KHN) recently reported on investigations by the OIG into hospitals allegedly offering unusually high salaries and other perks to specialists because they attract highly profitable business.

In the KHN article, titled, “Hospitals Accused of Paying Doctors Large Kickbacks in Quest for Patients,” Senior Correspondent Jordan Rau describes one investigation of salaries that involved certain high-profile specialists at Wheeling Hospital, in Wheeling, W.Va.

Wheeling, KHN reported, paid one anesthesiologist $1.2 million per year, which, Rau notes, is higher than the salaries of 90% of the pain management specialists around the country. Rau went on to describe how Wheeling also paid one obstetrician-gynecologist $1.3 million per year, and a cardiothoracic surgeon $770,000 per year along with 12 weeks of vacation time.

In each of those cases, the whistleblower who prompted the qui tam investigation reported that the specialists’ various departments were frequently in the red, reported KHN.

“The problem, according to the government, is that the efforts run counter to federal self-referral bans and anti-kickback laws that are designed to prevent financial considerations from warping physicians’ clinical decisions,” wrote Rau.

Wheeling not only contests the lawsuits brought against it, but also has filed a countersuit against the whistleblower. KHN said the hospital claims “its generous salaries were not kickbacks but the only way it could provide specialized care to local residents who otherwise would have to travel to other cities for services such as labor and delivery that are best provided near home.”

“We are confident that, if this case goes to a trial, there will be no evidence of wrongdoing—only proof that Wheeling Hospital offers the Northern Panhandle Community access to superior care, [and] world class physicians and services,” KHN reported Gregg Warren (above), Vice President of Marketing and Public Relations at Wheeling Hospital, saying in a statement. (Photo copyright: LinkedIn.)

OIG’s Fraud and Abuse Laws: A Roadmap for Physicians

The KHN article mentions five laws the OIG lists on its website that are particularly important for physicians to be aware of. They include the:

  • False Claims Act: states that it’s illegal to file false Medicare or Medicaid claims.
  • Anti-Kickback Statute: states that paying for referrals is illegal, that physicians can’t provide free or discounted services to uninsured people, and that money and gifts from drug and device makers to physicians are prohibited.
  • Stark Law(physician self-referral): says that referrals to entities with whom the physician has a familial or financial relationship are off-limits.
  • Exclusion Statue: describes who cannot participate in federal programs, such as Medicare.
  • Civil Monetary Penalties Law: authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services, which operates the OIG, to impose penalties in cases of fraud and abuse that involve Medicare or Medicaid.

“Together, these rules are intended to remove financial incentives that can lead doctors to order up extraneous tests and treatments that increase costs to Medicare and other insurers and expose patients to unnecessary risks,” KHN said.

Other Hospitals Under Investigation

Wheeling Hospital is not the only healthcare institution facing investigation. The Dallas Morning News (DMN) reported on a case involving Forest Park Medical Center (FPMC) in Dallas that resulted in the conviction of seven defendants, including four doctors. Prosecutors outlined the scheme in court, saying that FPMC illegally paid for surgeries.

“Prosecutors said the surgeons agreed to refer patients to the Dallas hospital in exchange for money to market their practices,” DMN reported, adding “Patients were a valuable commodity sold to the highest bidder, according to the government.” 

One of the convicted physicians, Michael Rimlawi, MD, told DMN, “I’m in disbelief. I thought we had a good system, a fair system.” His statement may indicate the level to which some healthcare providers at FPMC did not clearly understand how anti-kickback laws work.

“The verdict in the Forest Park case is a reminder to healthcare practitioners across the district that patients—not payments—should guide decisions about how and where doctors administer treatment,” US Attorney Erin Nealy Cox told DMN.

Know What Is and Is Not a Kickback

Both the Wheeling Hospital investigation and the Forest Park Medical Center case make it clear that kickbacks don’t always look like kickbacks. Becker’s Hospital Review published an article titled “Four Biggest Anti-Kickback Settlements Involving Hospitals in 2018” that details cases in which hospitals chose to settle.

These four incidents involved hospitals in Tennessee, Montana, Pennsylvania, and New York. This demonstrates that kickback schemes take place nationwide. And they show that violations of the Stark Law, the False Claims Act, and the Anti-Kickback Statute can happen in numerous ways.

Whether in a clinical laboratory or an enterprisewide health network, violating laws written to prevent money—rather than appropriate patient care—from being the primary motivator in hiring decisions, may result in investigation, charges, fines, and even conviction.

“If we’re going to solve the healthcare pricing problem, these kinds of practices are going to have to go away,” Vikas Saini, MD, President of the Lown Institute, a Massachusetts nonprofit that advocates for affordable care, told KHN.

Though these recent OIG investigations target hospitals, clinical laboratory leaders know from past experience that they also must be vigilant and ensure their hiring practices do not run afoul of anti-kickback legislation.

—Dava Stewart

Related Information:

Hospitals Accused of Paying Doctors Large Kickbacks in Quest for Patients

A Roadmap for New Physicians: Fraud and Abuse Laws

Surgeons, hospital owner convicted in massive kickback scheme involving Forest Park Medical Center

Four Biggest Anti-Kickback Settlements Involving Hospitals in 2018

Clinical Laboratory Compliance Practices Under Pressure as Federal Spotlight Is Aimed at Common Fraud and Abuse Schemes; Penalties for Violations Surge

Biodiagnostic Laboratory Services Leaders Sentenced to Prison in $100-Million Lab Test Kickback Scheme That Also Led to Convictions of 38 Physicians Does New Opioid Law Require Clinical Laboratories to Change How They Pay Sales Employees?

Biodiagnostic Laboratory Services Leaders Sentenced to Prison in $100-Million Lab Test Kickback Scheme That Also Led to Convictions of 38 Physicians

DOJ says now-defunct clinical laboratory in New Jersey generated test orders by bribing physicians with cash, concert tickets, vacations, high-end automobiles, and prostitutes 

It finally happened! Two medical laboratory executives were given jail sentences for their role in the rampant fraud and abuse committed during the operation of Biodiagnostic Laboratory Services (BLS) of Parsippany, N.J. The court accepted their guilty pleas in 2015, but delayed sentencing until this year, because the two defendants cooperated with prosecutors.

Anatomic pathologists and clinical laboratory managers pushing for stronger enforcement of anti-kickback laws may have gotten their wish with the sentences announced by the federal judge. The two BLS executives admitted to bribing doctors in a $100-million kickback scheme. Thirty-eight doctors also have been convicted of criminal felony charges during the more than five-year investigation.

On June 13, the judge sentenced David Nicoll, 44, President of now-defunct BLS, to six years in federal prison. His brother Scott Nicoll, 37, a concert ticket broker who became a senior BLS employee, received a 43-month sentence. Each defendant previously had pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Federal Travel Act and one count of money laundering.

“Today, the president of a diagnostic lab company and his brother were sentenced for their leading roles in a scam that led to one of the largest ever prosecutions of medical professionals in a bribery case,” U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito, JD, stated in a U.S. Attorney’s Office news release. “Medical referrals from a doctor should be based on what’s in the patient’s best interest, not on how much money the doctor is offered in kickbacks. The number of doctors and medical professionals sent to prison in this case should make that message abundantly clear.”

Hundreds of Doctors Bribed!

Prosecutors believe BLS may be one of the largest medical frauds ever prosecuted, with the federal investigation into the scheme leading to convictions of 53 defendants including:

  • BLS President David Nicoll;
  • BLS employee Scott Nicoll;
  • 38 physicians and physician assistants;
  • Three Nicoll extended-family members; and,
  • 10 others, including numerous other BLS employees.

While the brothers’ sentences were far below the 25-year combined maximum jail time they faced after pleading guilty to conspiracy to bribe doctors and money laundering, their cooperation with prosecutors led to reduced sentences.

A one-time nurse and former pharmaceutical sales representative, David Nicoll purchased BLS in 2005, which was then a failing clinical testing laboratory. In his testimony for the government prosecution, the 44-year-old Nicoll described how his company took business away from competing labs by bribing doctors to steer blood samples to BLS for testing.

Now-defunct Biodiagnostic Laboratory Services President David Nicoll (second from left) and his brother Scott Nicoll (far right) leave a Newark courthouse in 2013 accompanied by their representatives. The two New Jersey brothers, who admitted to bribing hundreds of doctors and laundering money for fraudulent blood testing services, recently were sentenced to prison for their roles in the $100-million scheme. (Photo copyright: Associated Press.)

According to the Associated Press, Nicoll changed the lab’s fortunes by signing phony leases for space in doctors’ offices. After New Jersey outlawed the practice, BLS “switched to bribing doctors with bogus consultant agreements paid for by shell corporations formed specifically for that purpose.” Nicoll testified he bribed “the large majority” of the “probably hundreds” of doctors with whom he did business.

NJ Advance Media detailed the wide-reaching bribery scheme. It included not only monthly payments to physicians to keep the blood work orders flowing, but also big ticket payoffs, according to a U.S States Attorney’s Office District of New Jersey news release. The briberies included:

  • $50,000 Audi S5 turbocharged coupe;
  • Private jet to Key West for deep-see fishing;
  • Charter flight to the Super Bowl;
  • Tickets to a Katy Perry concert; and,
  • Prostitutes provided to at least five physicians.

Nicoll is alleged to have reaped huge personal gain from the fraud, including more than $33 million in distributions from the $200 million BLS received from the testing of blood specimens and related services between 2006 and 2013. In another article NJ Advance Media outlined some of the millions Nicoll spent to enhance his lifestyle, including an $800,000 Mickey Mouse-shaped backyard pool, trips on charter jets to four Super Bowls, and a collection of classic American muscle cars.

“The president and other employees of BLS bribed physicians to refer patients to their lab and order unnecessary lab tests, reaping millions of dollars, all in the name of greed,” Shantelle P. Kitchen, Acting Special Agent in Charge, IRS Criminal Investigation/Criminal Enforcement, Newark field office, stated in the U.S. Attorney’s Office statement, released in 2013 when the Nicolls’ brothers and a third BLS employee were arrested.

“Medical tests should only be run when medically necessary, not so someone can buy exotic cars and charter private jets. This type of healthcare fraud will not be tolerated and IRS-Criminal Investigations, along with our law enforcement partners, will vigorously investigate these crimes to bring the perpetrators to justice.”

More Physicians Plead Guilty to Fraud, Money Laundering, Tax Evasion

While dozens of physicians ultimately admitted to accepting bribes to refer business to BLS, New Jersey internist Frank Santangelo, MD, may have reaped the biggest payoff. Santangelo pleaded guilty in July 2013 of accepting more than $1.8 million in bribe payments from BLS for referrals, for which the lab was paid more than $6 million by Medicare and various insurance agencies between 2006 and 2012.

According to a July 8, 2015, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) news release, Santangelo was sentenced to 63 months in prison, fined $6,250 and forfeited $1.8 million as part of his plea agreement for violations of the Federal Travel Act, money laundering, and failing to file tax returns.

“Santangelo admitted he violated the trust of his patients, who should be able to count on their doctors’ prescribing only tests that are necessary, and recommending providers based solely on their qualifications,” stated then-U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman for the District of New Jersey, in the DOJ statement.

In another highly publicized case, George Roussis, a pediatrician, and his brother Nicholas Roussis, an obstetrician-gynecologist, both with practices in Staten Island, N.Y., were convicted of accepting cash payments totaling $175,000 from BLS employees and associates between 2010 and 2013. In addition, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said in a 2017 statement that BLS paid for strip club trips for the brothers, who in return funneled $1,450,000 and $250,000 of lab business to BLS, respectively. George Roussis, 45, was sentenced to 37 months in prison, while Nicholas Roussis, 49, received a 24-month sentence.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office statement, the government has recovered more than $15 million through forfeiture in what is believed to be a record-setting healthcare fraud case.

Criminal prosecution by federal prosecutors of both the clinical laboratory owners and the physicians who accepted bribes and illegal inducements in return for referring medical laboratory tests is not common. That fact makes this case noteworthy. It serves as a warning to all clinical laboratory professionals and the physicians who may accept kickbacks or illegal inducements that there is a risk that they can be prosecuted for these crimes.

—Andrea Downing Peck

 

Related Information:

He Bribed Doctors with Cash and Prostitutes. Here’s How much Time He’ll Spend in Prison

President of New Jersey Clinical Laboratory and his Brother, a Senior Employee, Sentenced to Prison in $100m+ Test Referral/Bribery Scheme

Doctor Sentenced to 63 Months in Prison for Accepting $1.8 Million in Bribes for Test Referrals

Brothers Who Ran $100M Health Fraud Scam Sentenced to Prison

Strip Clubs Bribes and Blood Money: The Inside Story of a $150M Medical Fraud

New Jersey Clinical Lab at Center of Largest Physician Bribery Case Ever Prosecuted Pleads Guilty

Five Doctors Plead Guilty in Connection with Test-Referral Scheme with New Jersey Clinical Lab

;