Jul 28, 2017 | Digital Pathology, Instruments & Equipment, Laboratory Instruments & Laboratory Equipment, Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory News, Laboratory Operations, Laboratory Pathology
Project should provide treasure-trove of molecular information on human protein and lead to development of new biomarkers for use in clinical laboratory tests and personalized medicine
Human proteins provide clinical laboratories and anatomic pathology groups with a rich source of biomarkers used in medical tests and personalized medicine. Pathologists, therefore, should take note of a major milestone achieved by researchers from the Technical University of Munich (TUM) that moves science closer to developing a way to understand the complete human proteome.
Scientists participating in the ProteomeTools project have announced the synthesis of a library of more than 330,000 peptides representing essentially all canonical proteins of the human proteome.
Translating Human Proteome into Molecular and Digital Tools
The ProteomeTools project is “a joint effort of TUM, JPT Peptide Technologies, SAP SE, and Thermo Fisher Scientific … dedicated to translating the human proteome into molecular and digital tools for drug discovery, personalized medicine, and life science research.” Over the course of the project, 1.4 million synthetic peptides covering essentially all human gene products will be synthesized and analyzed using multimodal liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
ProteomeTools published their first paper, “Building ProteomeTools Based on a Complete Synthetic Human Proteome,” which detailed their work in Nature Methods.
“ProteomeTools was started as a collaborative effort bringing together academic and industrial partners to make important contributions to the field of proteomics. It is gratifying to see that this work is now producing a wealth of significant results,” stated TUM researcher Bernhard Kuster, PhD, one of the leaders of the effort and senior author on the Nature Methods paper, in a TUM news release.
Thousands of New Biomarkers for Clinical Laboratories, and More!
Kuster discussed the significance of the consortium’s work in an article published in Genome Web, which described ProteomeTools as “a resource that provides the proteomics community with a set of established standards against which it can compare experimental data.”
“In proteomics today, we are doing everything by inference,” Kuster stated to Genome Web. “We have a tandem mass spectrum and we use a computer algorithm to match it to a peptide sequence that [is generated] in silico to simulate what their spectrum might look like without us actually knowing what it looks like. That is a very fundamental problem.”
Bernhard Kuster, PhD (above center), of the Technical University of Munich (TUM), led a team of researchers from the ProteomeTools project who completed a tandem mass spectrometry analysis of more than 330,000 synthetic tryptic peptides representing essentially all of the canonical human gene products. The resource eventually will cover all one million peptides. (Photo copyright: Andreas Heddergott/TUM.)
In the Genome Web article, Kuster provides an example of how researchers could use the information developed by ProteomeTools, noting it could be useful for confirming peptide identification in borderline cases. “Because the spectra for these synthetic peptides are available to everyone, you could look up a protein or peptide ID that you find exciting, but where the [experimental] data might not totally convince you as to whether it is true or not,” he explained.
Kuster also states that he believes the resource has the potential to allow “the field to move away from conventional database searching methods toward a spectral matching approach.”
The TUM news release notes that the ProteomeTools project “will generate a further one million peptides and corresponding spectra with a focus on splice variants, cancer mutations, and post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and ubiquitinylation.” The end result could be a treasure-trove of molecular information on the human proteome and development of thousands of new biomarkers for clinical use for therapeutic drugs, and more.
“Representing the human proteome by tandem mass spectra of synthetic peptides alleviates some of the current issues with protein identification and quantification. The libraries of peptides and spectra now allow us to develop new and improve upon existing hardware, software, workflows, and reagents for proteomics. Making all the data available to the public provides a wonderful opportunity to exploit this resource beyond what a single laboratory can do. We are now reaching out to the community to suggest interesting sets of peptides to make and measure as well as to create LC-MS/MS data on platforms not available to the ProteomeTools consortium,” Kuster stated in the TUM news release.
All data from the ProteomeTools project is available at the ProteomeXchange Consortium. Pathologists and clinical laboratory professionals working to develop new assays will find it to be a valuable resource.
—Andrea Downing Peck
Related Information:
Researchers Build Complete Synthetic Human Proteome
Building Proteome Tools Based on a Complete Synthetic Human Proteome
Milestone for the Analysis of Human Proteomes
Jun 16, 2017 | Digital Pathology, Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory News, Laboratory Operations, Laboratory Pathology
Pathologists and clinical lab managers can help physicians more effectively select appropriate genetic tests and better interpret results to identify the most appropriate therapies for their patients
Clinical laboratories and pathology groups aren’t the only healthcare providers being scrutinized for cost cutting and workflow efficiencies. Physicians ordering genetic tests are now in the spotlight thanks to a study of genetic test misordering by one healthcare institution.
In her award-winning presentation, “Genetic Testing Costs and Compliance with Clinical Best Practices,” given at the 2016 annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Kathleen Ruzzo, MD, revealed some startling facts to the attendees. Ruzzo is an obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN) resident at the Naval Medical Center (NMC) in San Diego. She and a team of NMC researchers had reviewed all genetic tests ordered during a 3-month period. They found that more than one-third of the genetic tests examined were unnecessary and had led to more than $20,000 in additional healthcare expenditures. This got the attention of the ACOG, which awarded her 1st prize.
Critical Importance of Staying Informed on Genetic Tests
The researchers examined 114 charts that contained billing codes for genetic tests. They evaluated the charts for compliance with practice guidelines and completed a cost analysis of the tests. The tests were classified per GeneReviews guidelines and were labeled as:
- Appropriate;
- Misordered/Not Indicated;
- Misordered/False Reassurance; or
- Misordered/Inadequate.
GeneReviews is an online database focusing on information, diagnosis, management, and counseling of single-gene disorders. It is published by the National Center for Biotechnology Information.
The researchers found that:
- 44 of the 114 charts examined (39%) were misordered based on the guidelines;
- 24 of the tests were labeled as misordered/not indicated;
- Eight tests were classified as misordered/false reassurance; and
- 12 tests were determined to be misordered/inadequate.
“We know there is an ever-expanding number of genetic tests available for clinicians to order, and there is more direct marketing to the patient,” stated Ruzzo in an Ob. Gyn. News article. “It can be difficult to stay on top of that as we have so many different clinical responsibilities.”
Kathleen Ruzzo, MD (above right) and Monica Lutgendorf, MD (above left) of the Naval Medical Center in San Diego, reviewed 114 genetic tests ordered during a three-month period. They discovered that 39% of the tests were misordered according to guidelines, costing a total of $75,000. (Photo copyright: Naval Medical Center.)
The actual testing was performed by Laboratory Corporation of America and occurred over a three-month period. The seven common genetic tests that were reviewed were tests for:
The cost analysis of the tests revealed that $20,000 could have been saved by following the GeneReviews guidelines. The total costs affiliated with the 114 tests reached $75,000. Potential savings were thus 26.6% of the total cost of the genetic tests involved in this study. In many clinical settings, if pathologists and medical laboratory managers could help physicians better utilize genetic tests while reducing the cost of such testing by almost 27%, that would be a major contribution. Plus, patients would be getting better care.
Ordering the Right Genetic Test Saves Money and Protects Patients
According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), costs affiliated with genetic tests can range from less than $100 to more than $2,000 depending on the type and intricacy of the test. The NIH notes that many insurance companies will pay for genetic testing if ordered by a physician.
Ruzzo also shared that many of her cohorts were surprised at the results of the research.
“I think it opened a lot of people’s eyes … to be more meticulous about [genetic] testing and to ask for help when you need help,” she stated in the Ob. Gyn. News article. “Having trained individuals, reviewing genetic tests could save money in the healthcare system more broadly. We could also approve the appropriate testing for the patient.”
Ruzzo did admit there were limitations to the study; the researchers only looked at small amounts of tests for a short period and they did not concentrate on the consequences of the misordering to the patients.
Monica Lutgendorf, MD, Maternal Fetal Medicine Physician at the Naval Medical Center, was one of the coauthors of the paper. In the Ob. Gyn. News article, she described the findings as “a call to action in general for ob-gyns to get additional training and resources to handle the ever-expanding number of [genetic] tests.”
“I don’t think that this is unique to any specific institution. I think this is part of the new environment of practice that we’re in,” Lutgendorf concluded.
Due to the costs of genetic testing and the fact that so many physicians have not been able to keep up with all the latest advances in genetic medicine and testing, misordering will, most likely, continue to be a problem. Nevertheless, pathologists and clinical laboratory managers can serve a crucial role in helping physicians be more effective at selecting the correct genetic tests and assisting them in interpreting results to choose the most appropriate therapies for their patients.
Meanwhile, for those pathologists and medical laboratory professionals interested in developing effective utilization management programs for lab tests, Dark Daily is presenting a special webinar, titled, “Simple, Swift Approaches to Lab Test Utilization Management: Proven Ways for Your Clinical Laboratory to Use Data and Collaborations to Add Value.” It will take place on Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 1PM EDT.
For information about this high-value webinar and to register, use this link (or copy this URL and paste into your browser: https://ddaily.wpengine.com/webinar/simple-swift-approaches-to-lab-test-utilization-management-proven-ways-for-your-clinical-laboratory-to-use-data-and-collaborations-to-add-value.)
—JP Schlingman
Related Information:
More Than One-Third of Genetic Tests Misordered, Study Finds
Genetic Tests Often Overused and Misinterpreted, Sometimes with Tragic Consequences
Webinar: Simple, Swift Approaches to Lab Test Utilization Management: Proven Ways for Your Clinical Laboratory to Use Data and Collaborations to Add Value
Research Awards Announced for ACOG 2017 Annual Meeting
Unnecessary Genetic Tests Wastes $500 Million Annually
Jun 14, 2017 | Digital Pathology, Instruments & Equipment, Laboratory Instruments & Laboratory Equipment, Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory News, Laboratory Operations, Laboratory Pathology, Laboratory Testing, Management & Operations
New discoveries about the genetics of prostate cancer could lead to better tools for diagnosing the disease and selecting effective therapies based on each patient’s specific physiology
In recent decades, the biggest challenge for urologists, and for the pathologists who diagnosed the prostate tissue specimens they referred, has been how to accurately differentiate between non-aggressive prostate cancer, which can exist for decades with no apparent symptoms, and aggressive prostate cancer that kills quickly.
Thus, a research study that has identified unique genetic features within prostate cancer that can help determine if the cancer is aggressive or not, and whether certain drugs may be effective, is good news for men, for urologists, and for the clinical laboratories that will be called upon to perform testing.
These types of breakthroughs bring precision medicine ever closer to having viable tools for effective diagnosis of different types of cancer.
Genetic Fingerprints of Cancer Tumor Types
One such study into the genetic pathways of prostate cancer is bringing precision medicine ever-closer to the anatomic pathology laboratory. Researchers from the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, which is associated with the University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, have discovered that some tumors in prostate cancer have a genetic fingerprint that may indicate whether or not the disease will become more aggressive and less responsive to treatment.
Robert Bristow, MD, PhD, and Paul Boutros, PhD, conducted a study of nearly 500 Canadian men who had prostate cancer. Published in the journal Nature, the researchers examined the genetic sequences of those tumors, looking for differences between those that responded to surgery or radiation and those that did not.
In the video above, Dr. Robert Bristow, clinician-scientist at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses the findings of a key piece in the genetic puzzle that explains why men born with a BRCA2 mutation develop aggressive prostate cancer. (Caption and photo copyright: University Health Network/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre.)
According to a FierceBiotech article, approximately 30% of men who have a type of prostate cancer thought to be curable eventually develop an aggressive metastatic type of the disease. About half of the men who developed a metastatic form of cancer had mutations to three specific genes:
“This information gives us new precision about the treatment response of men with prostate cancer and important clues about how to better treat one set of men versus the other to improve cure rates overall,” stated Bristow in a University Health Network (UHN) press release.
In another study, researchers looked at 15 patients with BRCA2-inheritied prostate cancer and compared the genomic sequences of those tumors to a large group of sequences from tumors in less-aggressive cancer cases. According to a ScienceDaily news release, they found that only 2% of men with prostate cancer have the BRCA2-inherited type.
Knowing what type of cancer a man has could be critically important for clinicians tasked with prescribing the most efficient therapies.
“The pathways that we discovered to be abnormal in the localized BRCA2-associated cancers are usually only found in general population cancers when they become resistant to hormone therapy and spread through the body,” noted Bristow in the ScienceDaily release. If clinicians knew from diagnosis that the cancer is likely to become aggressive, they could choose a more appropriate therapy from the beginning of treatment.
Genetic Mutations Also Could Lead to Breast and Brain Cancer Treatments
BRCA mutations have also been implicated in breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers, among some other types. The knowledge that BRCA1 and BRACA2 mutations could indicate a more aggressive cancer is likely to spark investigation into whether poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors could be used as an effective therapy.
PARP inhibitors are increasingly of interest to scientists. In addition to being used to treat some BRCA1/BRCA2-implicated cancers, two recent studies show that it could be effective in treating brain cancer with low-grade gliomas that involve a mutation to the gene isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), according to an article published by the National Cancer Institute and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Researchers of the study published in the journal Clinical Cancer Research investigated how PARP inhibitors impact DNA repair in gliomas.
Researchers of the study published in the journal Science Translational Medicine stated that they “demonstrate mutant IDH1-dependent PARP inhibitor sensitivity in a range of clinically relevant models, including primary patient-derived glioma cells in culture and genetically matched tumor xenografts in vivo.”
According to the UHN press release, the next step in using the knowledge that BRCA1 and BRCA2 may indicate a more aggressive prostate cancer is for researchers to create a diagnostic tool that can be used to determine what type of prostate cancer a man has. They expect the process to take several years. “This work really gives us a map to what is going on inside a prostate cancer cell, and will become the scaffold on which precision therapy will be built,” Boutros stated in a Prostate Cancer Canada news release.
Unlocking Knowledge That Leads to Accurate Diagnoses and Treatments
Research that furthers precision medicine and allows clinicians to choose the most appropriate treatment for individuals shows how quickly scientists are applying new discoveries. Every new understanding of metabolic pathways that leads to a new diagnostic tool gives clinicians and the patients they treat more information about the best therapies to select.
For the anatomic pathology profession, this shows how ongoing research into the genetic makeup of prostate cancer is unlocking knowledge about the genetic and metabolic pathways involved in this type of cancer. Not only does this help in diagnosis, but it can guide the selection of appropriate therapies.
On the wider picture, the research at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre is one more example of how scientists are rapidly applying new knowledge about molecular and genetic processes in the human body to identify new ways to more accurately diagnose disease and select therapies.
—Dava Stewart
Related Information:
Genomic Hallmarks of Localized, Non-Indolent Prostate Cancer
Newly Discovered Genetic Fingerprint for Prostate Cancer Promises to Personalize Treatment
Prostate Cancer Team Cracks Genetic Code to Show Why Inherited Disease Can Turn Lethal
PARP Inhibitors May Be Effective in Brain, Other Caners with IDH Mutations
Chemosensitivity of IDH1-Mutated Gliomas Due to an Impairment in PARP1-Mediated DNA Repair
2-Hydroxyglutarate Produced by Neomorphic IDH Mutations Suppresses Homologous Recombination and Induces PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity
Prostate Cancer Researchers Find Genetic Fingerprint Identifying How, When Disease Spreads
Scientists Identify DNA Signature Linked to Prostate Cancer Severity
May 30, 2017 | Digital Pathology, Instruments & Equipment, Laboratory Instruments & Laboratory Equipment, Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory News, Laboratory Pathology, Laboratory Testing
Few anatomical tools hold more potential to revolutionize the science of diagnostics than biomarkers, and pathologists and medical laboratories will be first in line to put these powerful tools to use helping patients with chronic diseases
There’s good news for both anatomic pathology laboratories and medical laboratories worldwide. Large numbers of clinically-useful new biomarkers continue to be validated and are in development for use in diagnostic tests and therapeutic drugs.
Clinical laboratories rely on biomarkers for pathology tests and procedures that track and identify infections and disease during the diagnostic process. Thus, trends that highlight the critical role biomarkers play in medical research are particularly relevant to pathology groups and medical laboratories.
Here’s an overview of critical trends in biomarker research and development that promise to improve diagnosis and treatment of chronic disease.
Emerging Use of Predictive Biomarkers in Precision Medicine
Recent advances in whole genome sequencing are aiding the development of highly accurate diagnostics and treatment plans that involve the development and use of Predictive Biomarkers that improve Precision Medicine (PM).
PM involves an approach to healthcare that is fine-tuned to each patient’s unique condition and physiology. As opposed to the conventional one-size-fits-all approach, which looks at the best options for the average person without examining variations in individual patients.
Predictive biomarkers identify individuals who will most likely respond either favorably or unfavorably to a drug or course of treatment. This improves a patient’s chance to receive benefit or avoid harm and goes to the root of Precision Medicine. (Image copyright: Pennside Partners.)
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) defines PM as “an emerging approach for disease treatment and prevention that considers individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person.” It gives physicians and researchers the ability to more accurately forecast which prevention tactics and treatments will be optimal for certain patients.
Combining Drugs for Specific Outcomes
Cancer treatment will be complimented by the utilization of combination drugs that include two or more active pharmaceutical ingredients. Many drug trials are currently being performed to determine which combination of drugs will be the most favorable for specific cancers.
Combination drugs should become crucial in the treatment of different cancers treatments, such as immunotherapy, which involves treating disease by inducing, enhancing, or suppressing an immune response.
Biomarkers associated with certain cancers may enable physicians and researchers to determine which combination drugs will work best for each individual patient.
Developing More Effective Diagnostics
In Vitro diagnostics (IVDs) are poised for massive growth in market share. A report by Allied Market Research, states the worldwide IVD market will reach $81.3 billion by 2022. It noted that IVD techniques in which bodily fluids, such as blood, urine, stool, and sputum are tested to detect disease, conditions, and infections include important technologies such as:
Allied Market Research expects growth of the IVD market to result from these factors:
- Increases in chronic and infectious diseases;
- An aging population;
- Growing knowledge of rare diseases; and
- Increasing use of personalized medicines.
The capability to sequence the human genome is further adding to improvements in diagnostic development. Pharmaceutical companies can generate diagnostic counterparts alongside related drugs.
Biopsies from Fluid Sources
Millions of dollars have been spent on developing liquid biopsies that detect cancer from simple blood draws. The National Cancer Institute Dictionary of Cancer Terms defines a liquid biopsy as “a test done on a sample of blood to look for cancer cells from a tumor that are circulating in the blood or for pieces of DNA from tumor cells that are in the blood.”
At present, liquid biopsies are typically used only in the treatment and monitoring of cancers already diagnosed. Companies such as Grail, a spinoff of Illumina, and Guardant Health are striving to develop ways to make liquid biopsies a crucial part of cancer detection in the early stages, increasing long-term survival rates.
“The holy grail in oncology has been the search for biomarkers that could reliably signal the presence of cancer at an early stage,” said Dr. Richard Klausner, Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer at Grail.
Grail hopes to market a pan-cancer screening test that will measure circulating nucleic acids in the blood to detect the presence of cancer in patients who are experiencing no symptoms of the disease.
Clinical Trials and Precision Medicine
The Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI), launched by the federal government in 2015, investigates ways to create tailor-made treatments and prevention strategies for patients based on their distinctive attributes.
Two ongoing studies involved in PMI research are MATCH and TAPUR:
- MATCH (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice) is a clinical trial run by The National Cancer Institute. The researchers are studying tumors to learn if they possess gene abnormalities that are treatable by known drugs.
- TAPUR (Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry), is a non-randomized clinical trial being conducted by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). The researchers are chronicling the safety and efficacy of available cancer drugs currently on the market.
New Tools for Pathologists and Clinical Laboratories
The attention and funds given to these types of projects expand the possibilities of being able to develop targeted therapies and treatments for patients. Such technological advancements could someday enable physicians to view and treat cancer as a product of specific gene mutations and not just a disease.
These trends will be crucial and favorable for clinical laboratories in the future. As tests and treatments become unique to individual patients, pathologists and clinical laboratories will be on the frontlines of providing advanced services to healthcare professionals.
—JP Schlingman
Related Information:
5 Trends Being Impacted by Biomarkers
Immuno-Oncology Stories of 2016
Bristol-Myers Leads Immune-Oncology Race but Merck, Astrazeneca and Roche Still Have Contenders
Five Companies to Watch in the Liquid Biopsy Field
Illumina Spinoff GRAIL to Trial Liquid Biopsies for Early Detection of Cancer
Illumina Forms New Company to Enable Early Cancer Detection via Blood-Based Screening
A to Z List of Cancer Drugs
Personalized Medicine and the Role of Predictive vs. Prognostic Markers
Understanding Prognostic versus Predictive Biomarkers
NCI-MATCH Trial (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice)
Six Months of Progress on the Precision Medicine Initiative
May 17, 2017 | Digital Pathology, Instruments & Equipment, Laboratory Instruments & Laboratory Equipment, Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory News, Laboratory Operations, Laboratory Pathology, Laboratory Testing, Management & Operations
Genomics is quickly becoming the foundational disruptor technology on which many new and powerful clinical laboratory tests and procedures will be based
Genomics testing has become accessible, affordable, and in some instances, life-saving. Clinical laboratories and pathology groups are handling more genomic data each year, and the trend does not appear to be slowing down. Here are current trends in genomic research that soon could be bringing new capabilities to medical laboratories nationwide.
Improved Data Sharing
Sometimes genetic tests don’t translate into better outcomes for patients because medical labs are limited in how they can share genomic data. Thus, experts from various disciplines are seeking ways to integrate genomic data sharing into the hospital and laboratory clinical workflow in a form that’s easily accessible to doctors. (more…)
May 15, 2017 | Digital Pathology, Instruments & Equipment, Laboratory Instruments & Laboratory Equipment, Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory News, Laboratory Operations, Laboratory Pathology
Low-cost assay would be a boon in remote areas, war zones, and emergency departments by providing fast and reliable blood typing without the need for specialized clinical lab equipment, and by reducing demand on type-O blood supplies
Chinese researchers claim to have invented an inexpensive point-of-care (POC), paper-based blood test that can determine a patient’s blood type in seconds and with nearly perfect accuracy.
Such an inexpensive, simple-to-use assay would be game changing for pathology groups and clinical laboratories since traditional tests to classify blood into blood groups remain time consuming and labor intensive despite recent advances.
Changing Colors Reveal Blood Type
Hong Zhang and colleagues at Third Military Medical University in Chongqing, China, published their results in the March 15, 2017, issue of Science Translational Medicine. (more…)
