News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel
Sign In

Preparing for Z-Codes as DEX Genetic Testing Registry Rolls Out to Commercial Health Plans

Palmetto GBA’s Chief Medical Officer will cover how clinical laboratories billing for genetic testing should prepare for Z-Codes at the upcoming Executive War College in New Orleans

After multiple delays, UnitedHealthcare (UHC) commercial plans will soon require clinical laboratories to use Z-Codes when submitting claims for certain molecular diagnostic tests. Several private insurers, including UHC, already require use of Z-Codes in their Medicare Advantage plans, but beginning June 1, UHC will be the first to mandate use of the codes in its commercial plans as well. Molecular, anatomic, and clinical pathologist Gabriel Bien-Willner, MD, PhD, who oversees the coding system and is Chief Medical Officer at Palmetto GBA, expects that other private payers will follow.

“A Z-Code is a random string of characters that’s used, like a barcode, to identify a specific service by a specific lab,” Bien-Willner explained in an interview with Dark Daily. By themselves, he said, the codes don’t have much value. Their utility comes from the DEX Diagnostics Exchange registry, “where the code defines a specific genetic test and everything associated with it: The lab that is performing the test. The test’s intended use. The analytes that are being measured.”

The registry also contains qualitative information, such as, “Is this a good test? Is it reasonable and necessary?” he said.

Bien-Willner will answer those questions and more at the upcoming annual Executive War College on Diagnostics, Clinical Laboratory, and Pathology Management in New Orleans on April 30-May 1. Lab professionals still have time to register and attend this important presentation.

Molecular, anatomic, and clinical pathologist Gabriel Bien-Willner, MD, PhD (above), Palmetto GBA’s Chief Medical Officer, will speak about Z-Codes and the MolDX program during several sessions at the upcoming Executive War College on Diagnostics, Clinical Laboratory, and Pathology Management taking place in New Orleans on April 30-May 1. Clinical laboratories involved in genetic testing will want to attend these critical sessions. (Photo copyright: Bien-Willner Physicians Association.)

Palmetto GBA Takes Control

Palmetto’s involvement with Z-Codes goes back to 2011, when the company established the MolDX program on behalf of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The purpose was to handle processing of Medicare claims involving genetic tests. The coding system was originally developed by McKesson, and Palmetto adopted it as a more granular way to track use of the tests.

In 2017, McKesson merged its information technology business with Change Healthcare Holdings LLC to form Change Healthcare. Palmetto GBA acquired the Z-Codes and DEX registry from Change in 2020. Palmetto GBA had already been using the codes in MolDX and “we felt we needed better control of our own operations,” Bien-Willner explained.

In addition to administering MolDX, Palmetto is one of four regional Medicare contractors who require Z-Codes in claims for genetic tests. Collectively, the contractors handle Medicare claims submissions in 28 states.

Benefits of Z-Codes

Why require use of Z-Codes? Bien-Willner explained that the system addresses several fundamental issues with molecular diagnostic testing.

“Payers interact with labs through claims,” he said. “A claim will often have a CPT code [Current Procedural Technology code] that doesn’t really explain what was done or why.”

In addition, “molecular diagnostic testing is mostly done with laboratory developed tests (LDTs), not FDA-approved tests,” he said. “We don’t see LDTs as a problem, but there’s no standardization of the services. Two services could be described similarly, or with the same CPT codes. But they could have different intended uses with different levels of sophistication and different methodologies, quality, and content. So, how does the payer know what they’re paying for and whether it’s any good?”

When the CPT code is accompanied by a Z-Code, he said, “now we know exactly what test was done, who did it, who’s authorized to do it, what analytes are measured, and whether it meets coverage criteria under policy.”

The process to obtain a code begins when the lab registers for the DEX system, he explained. “Then they submit information about the test. They describe the intended use, the analytes that are being measured, and the methodologies. When they’ve submitted all the necessary information, we give the test a Z-Code.”

Then, the test undergoes a technical assessment. Bien-Willner described this as a risk-based process where complex tests, such as those employing next-generation sequencing or gene expression profiling, get more scrutiny than less-complex methodologies such as a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test.

The assessment could be as simple as a spreadsheet that asks the lab which cancer types were tested in validation, he said. On the other end of the scale, “we might want to see the entire validation summary documentation,” he said.

Commercial Potential

Bien-Willner joined the Palmetto GBA in 2018 primarily to direct the MolDX program. But he soon saw the potential use of Z-Codes and the DEX registry for commercial plans. “It became instantly obvious that this is a problem for all payers, not just Medicare,” he said.

Over time, he said, “we’ve refined these processes to make them more reproducible, scalable, and efficient. Now commercial plans can license the DEX system, which Z-Codes are a part of, to better automate claims processing or pre-authorizations.”

In 2021, the company began offering the coding system for Medicare Advantage plans, with UHC the first to come aboard. “It was much easier to roll this out for Medicare Advantage, because those programs have to follow the same policies that Medicare does,” he explained.

As for UHC’s commercial plans, the insurer originally planned to require Z-Codes in claims beginning Aug. 1, 2023, then pushed that back to Oct. 1, according to Dark Daily’s sister publication The Dark Report.

Then it was pushed back again to April 1 of this year, and now to June 1.

“The implementation will be in a stepwise fashion,” Bien-Willner advised. “It’s difficult to take an entirely different approach to claims processing. There are something like 10 switches that have to be turned on for everything to work, and it’s going to be one switch at a time.”

For Palmetto GBA, the commercial plans represent “a whole different line of business that I think will have a huge impact in this industry,” he said. “They have the same issues that Medicare has. But for Medicare, we had to create automated solutions up front because it’s more of a pay and chase model,” where the claim is paid and CMS later goes after errors or fraudulent claims.

“Commercial plans in general just thought they could manually solve this issue on a claim-by-claim basis,” he said. “That worked well when there was just a handful of genetic tests. Now there are tens of thousands of tests and it’s impossible to keep up.

They instituted programs to try to control these things, but I don’t believe they work very well.”

Bien-Willner is scheduled to speak about Palmetto GBA’s MolDX program, Z-Codes, and related topics during three sessions at the upcoming 29th annual Executive War College conference. Clinical laboratory and pathology group managers would be wise to attend his presentations. Visit here (or paste this URL into your browser: https://www.executivewarcollege.com/registration) to learn more and to secure your seat in New Orleans.

—Stephen Beale

Related Information:

Palmetto Issuing ‘Z-Codes’ to Track Molecular Dx Utilization, Gather Data CPT Codes Can’t Provide

McKesson and Change Healthcare Complete the Creation of New Healthcare Information Technology Company

UnitedHealthcare Commercial: Reimbursement Policy Update Bulletin: January 2024

UnitedHealthcare’s Z-Code Requirement for Genetic Testing Claims Impacts Laboratories and Payers

UHC Delays April 1st Z-Code Commercial Implementation to June 1, 2024

UHC Will Delay Enforcement of Z-Codes for Genetic Test Claims

Perfect Storm of Clinical Lab and Pathology Practice Regulatory Changes to Be Featured in Discussions at 29th Annual Executive War College

Forces in play will directly impact the operations and financial stability of many of the nation’s clinical laboratories

With significant regulatory changes expected in the next 18 to 24 months, experts are predicting a “Perfect Storm” for managers of clinical laboratories and pathology practices.

Currently looming are changes to critical regulations in two regulatory areas that will affect hospitals and medical laboratories. One regulatory change is unfolding with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the other regulatory effort centers around efforts to update the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA).

The major FDA changes involve the soon-to-be-published Final Rule on Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs), which is currently causing its own individual storm within healthcare and will likely lead to lawsuits, according to the FDA Law Blog.

In a similar fashion—and being managed under the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)—are the changes to CLIA rules that are expected to be the most significant since 2003.

The final element of the “Perfect Storm” of changes coming to the lab industry is the increased use by private payers of Z-Codes for genetic test claims.

In his general keynote, Robert L. Michel, Dark Daily’s Editor-in-Chief and creator of the 29th Executive War College on Diagnostics, Clinical Laboratory, and Pathology Management, will set the stage by introducing a session titled, “Regulatory Trifecta Coming Soon to All Labs! Anticipating the Federal LDT Rule, Revisions to CLIA Regulations, and Private Payers’ Z-Code Policies for Genetic Claims.”

“There are an unprecedented set of regulatory challenges all smashing into each other and the time is now to start preparing for the coming storm,” says Robert L. Michel (above), Dark Daily’s Editor-in-Chief and creator of the 29th Executive War College on Diagnostics, Clinical Laboratory, and Pathology Management, a national conference on lab management taking place April 30-May 1, 2024, at the Hyatt in New Orleans. (Photo copyright: The Dark Intelligence Group.)

Coming Trifecta of Disruptive Forces to Clinical Laboratory, Anatomic Pathology

The upcoming changes, Michel notes, have the potential to cause major disruptions at hospitals and clinical laboratories nationwide.

“Importantly, this perfect storm—which I like to describe as a Trifecta because these three disruptive forces that will affect how labs will conduct business—is not yet on the radar screen of most lab administrators, executives, and pathologists,” he says.

Because of that, several sessions at this year’s Executive War College conference, now in its 29th year, will offer information designed to give attendees a better understanding of how to manage what’s coming for their labs and anatomic pathology practices.

“This regulatory trifecta consists of three elements,” adds Michel, who is also Editor-in-Chief of Dark Daily’s sister publication The Dark Report, a business intelligence service for senior level executives in the clinical laboratory and pathology industry, as well in companies that offer solutions to labs and pathology groups.

According to Michel, that trifecta includes the following:

Element 1

FDA’s Draft LDT Rule

FDA’s LDT rule is currently the headline story in the lab industry. Speaking about this development and two other FDA initiatives involving diagnostics at the upcoming Executive War College will be pathologist Tim Stenzel, MD, PhD, former director of the FDA’s Office of In Vitro Diagnostics. It’s expected that the final rule on LDTs could be published by the end of April.

Stenzel will also discuss harmonization of ISO 13485 Medical Devices and the FDA’s recent memo on reclassifying most high-risk in vitro diagnostics to moderate-risk to ease the regulatory burden on companies seeking agency review of their diagnostic assays.

Element 2

CLIA Reforms and Updates

The second element is coming reforms and updates to the CLIA regulations, which Michel says will be the “most-significant changes to CLIA in more than two decades.” Speaking on this will be Reynolds Salerno, PhD, Acting Director, Center for Laboratory Systems and Response at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Salerno will also cover the CDC’s efforts to foster closer connections with clinical labs and their local public health laboratories, as well as the expanding menu of services for labs that his department now offers.

Element 3

Private Payer Use of Z-Codes for Test Claims

On the third development—increased use by private payers of Z-Codes for genetic test claims—the speaker will be pathologist Gabriel Bien-Willner, MD, PhD. He is the Medical Director of the MolDX program at Palmetto GBA, a Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC). It is the MolDX program that oversees the issuance of Z-Codes for molecular and diagnostic tests.

UnitedHealthcare (UHC) was first to issue such a Z-Code policy last year, although it has delayed implementation several times. Other major payers are watching to see if UHC succeeds with this requirement, Michel says.

Other Critical Topics to be Covered at EWC

In addition to these need-to-know regulatory topics, Michel says that this year’s Executive War College will present almost 100 sessions and include 148 speakers. Some of the other topics on the agenda in New Orleans include the following and more:

  • Standardizing automation, analyzers, and tests across 25 lab sites.
  • Effective ways to attract, hire, and retain top-performing pathologists.
  • Leveraging your lab’s managed care contracts to increase covered tests.
  • Legal and compliance risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical care.

“Our agenda is filled with the topics that are critically important to senior managers when it comes to managing their labs and anatomic pathology practices,” Michel notes.

“Every laboratory in the United States should recognize these three powerful developments are all in play at the same time and each will have direct impact on the clinical and financial performance of our nation’s labs,” Michel says. “For that reason, every lab should have one or more of their leadership team present at this year’s Executive War College to understand the implications of these developments.”

Visit here to learn more about the 29th Executive War College conference taking place in New Orleans.

—Bob Croce

Related Information:

One Step Closer to Final: The LDT Rule Arrives at OMB, Making a Lawsuit More Likely

FDA: CDRH Announces Intent to Initiate the Reclassification Process for Most High Risk IVDs

FDA Proposes Down-Classifying Most High-Risk IVDs

Z-codes Requirements for Molecular Diagnostic Testing

2024 Executive War College Agenda

Utah Public Employees Receive Transportation and a $500 Cash Bonus to Purchase Prescriptions in Mexico

Pharmaceutical tourism, like medical tourism, casts light on healthcare’s true costs and identifies patient populations that bear the brunt of growing drug prices

You’ve heard of medical tourism, where patients travel to other countries to receive low-cost, high-quality medical care. Now the State of Utah is introducing “pharmaceutical tourism” to state employees, who will be paid to make trips to Mexico to purchase certain prescription drugs.

The State of Utah is not alone in its use of this strategy. Prescription medication costs are skyrocketing for many critical drugs. To reign in those costs, several organizations are incentivizing their employees to purchase those drugs less expensively outside of the US. Clinical laboratories and anatomic pathology groups that perform companion diagnostic tests associated with certain high-priced therapeutic drugs might see more of their patients decide to cross international borders to access the drugs they need.

This pharmaceutical tourism highlights how complex US laws hide the true cost of prescription drugs from patients and their employers. It also raises the question: how might pharmaceutical tourism impact retail pharmacies in this country?

Saves Patients Money, but at What Cost?

The Public Employees Health Plan (PEHP) for Utah state employees recently announced a pharmacy tourism program. Its members can receive free air travel and $500 in cash to fill 90-day prescriptions in Mexico for certain higher-cost medications.

“The prescription drugs received in Mexico are the same quality and from the same manufacturer as those sold in the US,” said Travis Tolley, Clinical Management Director at PEHP Health and Benefits, in a news release. “The difference is the price you pay. For example, a 90-day supply for the average cost of an eligible drug in the US is over $4,500 per month and is 40-60% less in Mexico. The substantial savings allow us to reward our members for seeking lower-cost options.”

Participants in the program receive round-trip airfare from Utah to San Diego for themselves and a companion, followed by transportation to a clinic in Tijuana where their prescriptions are filled. They also can receive a taxable $500 cash bonus for each trip—up to four trips/year. The airfare from Salt Lake City to San Diego typically costs around $300. 

Health Insurance Right to Shop Amendments
In 2018, Utah passed the “Health Insurance Right to Shop Amendments” bill (H.B. 19), which requires PEHP to offer incentives and a savings reward program to members who seek out and utilize low-cost options for healthcare. State Representative Norman Thurston (above right) sponsored the bill. “Why wouldn’t we pay $300 to go to San Diego, drive across to Mexico, and save the system tens of thousands of dollars? If it can be done safely, we should be all over that,” he told Becker’s Hospital Review. (Photo copyright: Daily Herald.)

PEHP, which covers 160,000 public employees and family members, offers the pharmacy tourism program for 13 specific medications where a vast disparity in cost exists between the US and Mexico.

The drugs that qualify for the program along with the most common illnesses they treat are:

One of the more expensive drugs on the list, Avonex, costs approximately $6,700 for a month’s supply in the US compared to only about $2,200 at the contracted clinic in Tijuana. That’s a savings of approximately $13,500 for a three-month supply, which compensates for the program’s $500 cash reward and transportation costs. 

Not the First Time PEHP Tried Medical Tourism

PEHP previously offered free airfare to members willing to fly to other countries for medical procedures and prescriptions. However, without the cash incentives, participation was low. The health plan hopes the lure of $500 per trip will increase participation rate. 

UnitedHealthcare (UHC) also is experimenting with ways to lower prescription drug costs. Last year, they introduced My ScriptRewards. The program incentivizes members to opt for less expensive medications. Participants in this program receive up to $500 in prepaid debit cards to help defray their medical costs.

Currently, My ScriptRewards can only be used for select antiviral medications (Cimduo plus Isentress or Cimduo plus Tivicay) to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). And, it’s only available to UHC commercial plan members who are covered by group plans. However, UHC plans to expand the program to include other high-cost specialty medications in the future.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), prescription medications account for 9.8% of national health expenditures. And in 2017, Quintiles and IMS Health, Inc. (now IQVIA), a company that compiles data for the pharmaceutical industry, estimated that prescription spending in the US will reach an annual cost of $580-$610 billion by 2021.

Medical tourism is not new. Dark Daily has covered the trend many times in e-briefings such as, “Medical Tourism Continues to Flourish as U.S. Patients Seek Lower Cost Healthcare in Overseas Countries.” Opportunities still exist for pathology groups and medical laboratories in the US to provide reference or esoteric diagnostic services to healthcare providers in other countries.

And, with prescription costs soaring, it’s likely insurance providers will continue to seek new ways to curtail costs. In an era when many medical laboratory companies are charging sky-high prices for their proprietary tests and test panels, might “clinical laboratory tourism” be the next trend to emerge?

—JP Schlingman

Related Information:

UnitedHealthcare to Pay Patients to Choose Cheaper Drugs

To Fight High Drug prices, Utah Will Pay for Public Employees to go Fill

Prescriptions in Mexico

PEHP Health and Benefits Offers Cash Back for Using Low-Cost Healthcare Providers and Prescription Drugs

US Prescription Drug Spending as High as $610 Billion by 2021Medical Tourism Continues to Flourish as U.S. Patients Seek Lower Cost Healthcare in Overseas Countries

With Reduced Reimbursement from Medicare, Anatomic Pathology Groups and Clinical Laboratories Must Learn to Optimize Collections from Managed Care Payers to Stabilize Financials and Survive the Industry Shift

As PAMA brings estimated Medicare reimbursement cuts of up to 30% over the next three years to a range of typically high-volume tests and diagnostics, medical laboratories that wish to stay competitive must understand the needs of managed care payers and learn how to optimize collections, reduce denials, and communicate value effectively or risk their financial health

In what experts have called the biggest financial upheaval for the healthcare industry in three decades, the onset of new Medicare Part B Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (CLFS) reductions based on the Protecting Access to Medicare Act (PAMA)—and their continued decrease over coming years—places the financial integrity of clinical laboratories and anatomic pathology groups of all sizes in peril.

Recent years have seen major shifts in consolidation, automation, and efficiency analysis to help streamline both workflows and cashflows. However, the threat from the current and coming cuts to Medicare lab test prices will be particularly acute for smaller independent laboratories and hospital/health system lab outreach programs. These labs will continue to feel added strain due to reduced reimbursement across 25 of the most common tests billed to Medicare.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) predict that the cuts enacted on January 1, 2018, alone will result in Medicare payments to labs falling by a total of $670 million just in 2018. This amount is almost 70% greater than the $400 million in fee cuts the federal agency had predicted in statements it published last year. (See Dark Daily, “For Top 20 Tests, CMS to Cut Payment by 28% in 2018-2020,” October 9, 2017.)

And, that doesn’t account for subsequent cuts, which are estimated to reach nearly 30% over the next three years.

Cost of Service Disparities/In-Network Status Further Impact Clinical Labs

If the CLFS reductions weren’t enough, labs face another threat—managed care and commercial payers aligning with big national laboratories and narrowing networks in an attempt to lower costs and provide maximum return for both patients and shareholders. For smaller and independent laboratories, this represents a double threat.

In the first situation, larger laboratories can offer services at lower costs due to increased automation, batch processing, and other scale advantages. This means that while the lower CLFS rates will impact the financial integrity of larger labs, the actual margin lost is less than that of smaller laboratories and facilities that face higher costs to perform tests and provide services.

Compounding the situation, commercial and managed care payers searching out the best value for their patients and shareholders tend to narrow their networks by excluding many independent clinical lab companies and hospital lab outreach programs, amplifying this inherent disparity and skewing the advantage away from independent providers yet again.

Higher cost providers without a clear understanding of promoting their value to payers could have trouble obtaining in-network status. Yet, failing to obtain in-network status may reduce overall test quantities, further raise prices, and make smaller labs less competitive with larger national laboratories—a dangerous cycle with today’s competitive laboratory landscape.

Shifting Focus and Optimizing Managed Care Reimbursements

As the financial stability of Medicare reimbursements wanes, it is imperative that laboratories look to new methods to further increase efficiency and stabilize cashflows. Once a smaller portion of laboratory revenue, managed care organizations and commercial payers will be of increased importance as overall reimbursement rates continue to shrink in the face of healthcare reform and value-based care.

Unfortunately, many laboratories assume that by simply providing requested services they are due reimbursement from commercial payers. In the age of value-based care this is no longer the case and considered an outdated mindset—one that can lead to endless audits, increased recoupment costs, and which could drastically impact successful collection from managed care and commercial payers. (See Dark Daily, “Payers Hit Medical Laboratories with More and Tougher Audits: Why Even Highly-Compliant Clinical Labs and Pathology Groups Are at Risk of Unexpected Recoupment Demands,” October 16, 2015.)

Special June 26 Webinar: Improving Managed Care Reimbursement Efficiency

Understanding not just what these payers are attempting to achieve for their organization—but also how they structure requirements and processes to support their goals—is an essential element of succeeding in this previously smaller share of the marketplace.

For those interested in learning more about critical concerns regarding managed care payers in the post-2018 CLFS landscape, Pathology Webinars is hosting a 90-minute webinar on Tuesday, June 26, 2018, at 2:00 PM Eastern.

The webinar will include presentations from two experts on a range of topics including:

  • Actionable steps to absorb the loss of Medicare revenue due to the impact of the 2018 CLFS reductions;
  • How managed care payers process network status and payments;
  • Who in the managed care chain of command should receive your value proposition;
  • How to better align your value propositions, policies, and workflows with the requirements of managed care and commercial payers; and,
  • Understanding the roles managed care payers expect clinical laboratories and anatomic pathologists to play in managing and reducing unnecessary testing.

The first speaker, Frank Dookie, MBA, will provide an inside look at:

  • How managed care payers function;
  • Their requirements and workflows; and,
  • What they look for when considering network status for a laboratory.

Dookie is a laboratory professional who has worked on the payer side for 28 years. He is passionate about the role that diagnostics play or can play in healthcare, and has spent his career working for instrumentation providers, clinical laboratories, the intermediary space between laboratories and managed care companies, and managed care companies.

The second speaker, Michael Snyder, will bring the entire payment process into sharp focus. He will cover:

  • Optimizing the collection process;
  • Identifying the purpose of each step, each review, and each team member involved; and,
  • Critical points laboratories must address to ensure payment.

Snyder is the Senior Vice President of Network Operations for Avalon Healthcare Solutions, LLC, a firm that provides comprehensive benefit management services to the health plan industry and has more than 30 years’ experience in clinical laboratory management.

Frank R. Dookie, MBA (left), Contracting Executive with a major managed care company in Woodbridge, N.J.; and Michael Snyder (right), Senior Vice President with Avalon Healthcare Solutions in Flemington, N.J., will provide critical insights and actionable details for clinical laboratory and anatomic pathology group leaders who want to ensure future revenues.

An Essential Opportunity to Improve Your Reimbursements

This critical webinar offers anatomic pathology groups and medical laboratory managers essential information and actionable next steps to immediately leverage the potential of managed care payers. Additionally, it provides insider insight to laboratories straining to retain financial integrity as reduced reimbursements and increased regulatory burdens strain budgets and cashflows.

To register for the webinar and see further details about discussion topics, use this link  (or copy and paste the URL into your browser: https://pathologywebinars.com/current/managed-care-an-insiders-guide-to-improving-your-reimbursement-efficiency-with-strategies-that-work-626/).

As further Medicare payment reductions over the next three years drive reimbursements even lower, understanding how to capture the positive attention of payers—while working within the rules and policies driving their reimbursement decisions—will be an essential element of successful laboratory management and growth. Register now!

—Jon Stone

Related Information:

Continued ‘Aggressive Audit Tactics’ by Private Payers and Government Regulators Following 2018 Medicare Part B Price Cuts Will Strain Profitability of Clinical Laboratories, Pathology Groups

Payers Hit Medical Laboratories with More and Tougher Audits: Why Even Highly-Compliant Clinical Labs and Pathology Groups Are at Risk of Unexpected Recoupment Demands

Tougher Lab Regulations and New Legal Issues in 2018: More Frequent Payer Audits, Problems with Contract Sales Reps, Increased Liability for CLIA Lab Directors, Proficiency Testing Violations, and More

Coming PAMA Price Cuts to Medicare Clinical Lab Fees Expected to Be Heavy Financial Blow to Hospital Laboratory Outreach Programs

What Every Lab Needs to Know about the Medicare Part B Clinical Laboratory Price Cuts That Take Effect in Just 157 Days, on Jan. 1, 2018

Medicare Clinical Laboratory Price Cuts and Cost-cutting Predicted to be 2018’s Two Biggest Trends for Medical Laboratories in the United States

As Medical Laboratory Test Utilization Grows, Health Insurers Develop Programs to Manage Rising Costs

After seeing a rise in the volume of clinical lab tests physicians order, managed care plans are develop a variety of strategies to manage utilization and costs

Health insurers are taking more aggressive actions to control the cost of clinical laboratory testing. For many years, clinical laboratories and pathology groups have been concerned about the strategies used by Medicare to control the utilization and costs of medical laboratory tests. Private health insurers usually follow the actions of Medicare, the nation’s largest health insurer. But today, managed care plans are developing their own lab-test-utilization strategies in addition to following those of Medicare.

Recently, Managed Care magazine explained many of the steps health insurers take to keep the costs of clinical laboratory tests under control. The cover story in the October issue of the magazine, “Health Plans Deploy New Systems To Control Use of Lab Tests,” outlined how health insurers Cigna, Group Health Cooperative, Priority Health, and UnitedHealthcare (UHC) are managing lab test utilization. (more…)

;