News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel
Sign In

University of Michigan Study Links Value-Based Care Programs to Lower Readmission Rates and $32 Million in Medicare Savings in 2015; Clinical Laboratories Play Critical Role

Meaningful use, accountable care organizations, and bundled payment initiatives work best together to reduce readmissions, UM research suggests

Ever since the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) in 2012, healthcare organizations all over America have sought to prevent unnecessary hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge. For some clinical laboratories, this meant performing precise microbiology testing to ensure patients are discharged with prescriptions for oral antibiotics in-hand to combat possible infections. Now, a recent study reports that the effort could be paying off, and clinical laboratories played a critical role.

Research performed at the University of Michigan (UM) has linked lower readmission rates under the HRRP to voluntary value-based programs. The three value-based programs the UM researchers identified as contributing to the successful lowering of hospital readmission rates are:

The UM researchers published their findings in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Internal Medicine. It could be the first study to demonstrate that synergistic value-based reward programs facilitate healthcare improvement and efficiency. As opposed to HRRP financial penalties alone that is, according to a UM news release.

Researchers Had No Expectations of Payment Reform Programs

Researchers at UM found that all three programs operating together in 2015 (the last year included in the longitudinal study) resulted in about 2,400 fewer readmissions and a $32-million savings to Medicare, the UM release noted.

The team analyzed data on patients treated at 2,877 hospitals from 2008 through 2015 for:

Their source of information was publicly available Hospital Compare readmission data.

“We had no real expectations that hospitals’ participation in voluntary reforms would be associated with additional reductions in readmissions. We thought that it was just as likely that hospital participation in meaningful use, accountable care organization programs, or the Bundled Payment for Care [Improvement] Initiative may be distracting to hospitals, limiting readmissions reduction,” stated Andrew Ryan, PhD, in ACEPNow, a publication of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) in Irving, Texas. Ryan is an Associate Professor, Health Management and Policy, at UM’s School of Public Health.

More Participation Leads to Greater Reduction in Readmissions

Nevertheless, the UM researchers linked more reductions in readmissions based on common diagnoses to value-based “reward-style” programs than to HRRP financial penalties. And the more value-based programs a provider implemented, the greater reduction in hospital readmission rates, the study found.

Nearly all hospitals studied were participating in at least one of the value-based programs by 2015, as compared to no program participants in 2010, when the Affordable Care Act was signed into law, noted a Healthcare Dive article.

illustrates the reduction in hospital readmissions starting in 2012

The chart above from the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) illustrates the reduction in hospital readmissions starting in 2012, which multiple studies have linked to the CMS Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP). The rates, according to the KFF, are risk adjusted to account for age and certain medical conditions. (Image copyright: Kaiser Family Foundation.

For 56 providers that were not participating in value-based care programs by 2015, researchers found the following readmission reductions also were associated with HRRP:

  • 3% drop in heart failure readmissions;
  • 76% drop in heart attack readmissions; and
  • 82% decline in pneumonia readmissions.

For the majority of providers, however, escalating value-based care program participation resulted in greater readmission rate reductions, the study noted.

Readmission Reductions for Heart Failure Patients

Noting the influence of value-based programs, HealthcareDIVE and FierceHealthcare reported the following results for the heart-failure patients studied:

  • ACOs result in 2.1% annual readmission reduction;
  • MU participation attributed to a 2.3% drop in annual readmission reduction;
  • Involvement in all three programs (ACOs, MU, and bundled payments) result in the largest annual readmission declines for hospitals of 2.9%.

Readmission Reductions for Heart Attack, Pneumonia Patients

For myocardial infarction patients, the study showed these effects from value-based programs on readmission declines:

  • 7% from ACO launch;
  • 5% associated with MU; and
  • 2% readmission reductions when all programs were in effect.

For pneumonia patients, the research suggested these changes in readmission declines were associated with value-based programs:

  • 4% from ACO launch;
  • 4% due to MU; and
  • 9% when all programs were in effect.

The researchers advise that providers, aiming for quality improvement and cost savings, should leverage as many of these programs as possible.

“There is a reason to believe these [value-based] programs are reinforcing the broader push to value-based care. Our findings show the importance of a multi-pronged Medicare strategy to improve quality and value,” noted Ryan in the UM news release.

Clinical Laboratories Play Key Role in Reducing Readmissions

Accurate medical laboratory testing plays a critical role in the success of these hospital readmission reduction programs. Thus, all pathologists and laboratory personnel should congratulate themselves for a job well done. And commit to continuing their outstanding performance.

—Donna Marie Pocius 

Related Information:

Association Between Hospitals’ Engagement in Value-Based Reforms and Readmission Reduction in the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program

Voluntary Value-Based Health Programs Dramatically Reduce Hospital Readmissions

Value-Based Reforms Linked to Readmission Reductions

Hospitals Participating in Value-Based Programs Have Lower Readmission Rates

Study: Value-Based Care Programs Reduce Readmissions

Involving Patient’s Family in Discharge Process Linked to 25% Reduction in Hospital Readmissions

Integrating Caregivers at Discharge Significantly Cuts Patient Readmissions, Pitt Study Finds

Hospitals with Lowest 30-Day Readmission Rates Succeed at Reducing Rates by Improving Care Coordination and Monitoring of Patients After Discharge

Hospitals Object to CMS’s Web Posting of Raw Data on Hospital-Acquired Infections

American Hospital Association claims accuracy of posted HAC data not established

In further step to create transparency in patient outcomes delivered by individual hospitals, the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) has posted on its website information on eight hospital-acquired conditions (HAC). However, many hospital industry leaders were not happy with this action.

The CMS data is specific to individual healthcare facilities that treat Medicare patients. It includes info on two types of hospital-acquired infections (HAI), blood compatibility, and air embolisms. Pathologists and clinical laboratory managers will recognize that medical laboratory testing plays an important role in diagnosing and monitoring several of these conditions.
(more…)

Veterans Administration’s Website with Hospital Compare Website Delivers Improved Transparency to Patients

Efforts to improve transparency still don’t include clinical pathology lab data

Veterans, their family members and their healthcare providers can now go online to compare the performance of their local Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital against other VA hospitals. This new service launched just last year.

That is when the VA opened its Hospital Compare website to the public. This important step is consistent with the VA’s declared intent to achieve total transparency in veteran’s healthcare. Pathologists and clinical laboratory managers will want to check out this website to see how the quality performance of different VA hospitals is presented to patients and the public.
(more…)

Public Access to Provider Outcomes Data Improves Healthcare

Evidence is now in on the benefits of public access to data on provider outcomes. The Joint Commission released a report on hospital quality and safety in March entitled Improving America’s Hospitals: A Report on Quality and Safety. The report indicated that the Joint Commission’s Quality Check web site and Hospital Compare (operated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) [CMS]) have improved transparency and quality in hospitals.

Both two sites have led to an “unprecedented and effective level of accountability,” said Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Director Carolyn Clancy. Joint Commission President Dennis O’Leary added “I think most organizations want to do the best job they can. Obviously, when you make that data public, it raises the ante further.”

The report tracked how more than 3,000 hospitals performed on 15 performance measures between 2002 and 2005. Significant improvements achieved by hospitals were included providing smoking cessation advice to pneumonia patients, using specific interventions for heart attack patients, and providing heart failure patients with discharge instructions.

Many of the items tracked by the report are widely-accepted best practices—the type of long-established best practices that most patient-consumers take for granted that doctors or other medical staff are providing. The report and the Web sites of the Joint Commission and CMS are powerful eye-openers to patients, providing evidence that they don’t get the same quality of care from any hospital. In large cities, where patient-consumers can select the hospital for their care, patients are more likely to attend a hospital that is rated highly, especially when their insurance guarantees they will pay the same amount at either hospital.

Researchers believe that, for hospitals which did well in these studies, public reporting is increasing teamwork among medical staff. It is also lessening the healthcare system’s reliance on physicians to ensure that quality care was provided in the specific procedures being measured. Because hospitals, rather than individual physicians, are being profiled, everyone at the hospital is more willing to pitch in and raise the hospital’s quality and outcomes.

Dark Daily observes that the improvements posted by hospitals participating in this program are a direct result of several changes implemented by The Joint Commission. Among these are reforms to the survey system to include surprise inspections and a tracer methodology that tracks the care given an individual patient. Further, the resulting reports and hospital rankings were posted online. Dark Daily believes that these systemic improvements are likely to be adapted to monitor and rank the performance of every type of healthcare service provider.

This will include clinical laboratories and anatomic pathology groups. Laboratory organizations already implementing quality management principles into their operations are likely to have a head start on achieving high performance rankings. They are improving the performance of individual work processes, leading to improved quality, fewer errors, and higher physician and patient satisfaction.

Related Articles:

Improving America’s Hospitals: A Report on Quality and Safety

A Boost for Transparency (Modern Healthcare subscription required)

;