Though the cost of clinical laboratory testing is not highlighted in KFF’s annual survey, it is a component in how much employers pay for healthcare plans for their employees
Employers now pay higher health insurance premiums than ever for family coverage. However, because of the current tight labor market, they are generally absorbing much of that increase rather than passing the higher costs on to their workers. That’s one key takeaway from KFF’s 26th annual Employer Health Benefits Survey, which the non-profit published on Oct. 9, 2024. While the report does not comment specifically about the cost of clinical laboratory testing or genetic testing and how they may contribute to rising insurance costs, it stands to reason they are part of growing healthcare costs for corporate health benefits.
The KFF survey found that premiums for family coverage increased 7% in 2024, reaching an average of $25,572. That follows a 7% increase in 2023. “Over the past five years—a period of high inflation (23%) and wage growth (28%)—the cumulative increase in premiums has been similar (24%),” KFF stated in a press release.
However, the amount paid by workers has gone up by less than $300 since 2019. It now stands at an average of $6,296, a total increase of 5% over five years. On average, workers covered 25% of family premium costs in 2024, down from 29% in 2023. Workers with single coverage paid an average of $1,368—16% of the annual premium cost—compared with 17% in 2023.
“Employers are shelling out the equivalent of buying an economy car for every worker every year to pay for family coverage,” KFF President and CEO Drew Altman, PhD (above), said in a press release. “In the tight labor market in recent years, they have not been able to continue offloading costs onto workers who are already struggling with healthcare bills.” Rising costs of clinical laboratory testing is always part of the mix contributing to increased worker insurance premiums for employers. (Photo copyright: KFF.)
HDHP/SO plans, as defined by KFF, “have a deductible of at least $1,000 for single coverage and $2,000 for family coverage and are offered with an HRA [Health Reimbursement Arrangement] or are HSA [health savings account]-qualified.” Point-of-service plans “have lower cost sharing for in-network provider services and do not require a primary care gatekeeper to screen for specialist and hospital visits,” the report states.
Cost Sharing via Deductibles
Average deductible amounts—which KFF identified as another form of cost-sharing—varied depending on the type of plan, employer size, and whether the worker had family or single coverage.
For workers with single coverage, average deductibles across all plan types rose from $1,655 in 2019 to $1,787 in 2024, a total five-year increase of about 8%. The average in 2023 was $1,735. These numbers were for in-network providers.
The report noted that some family plans calculate deductibles using an aggregate structure, “in which all family members’ out-of-pocket expenses count toward the deductible,” whereas others use a separate per-person structure. The report includes breakdowns of average deductibles across all types.
Who Offers the Best Benefits?
In general, the KFF report found that large companies—defined as those with 200 or more workers—tend to offer more generous health benefits than smaller ones. Virtually all large companies (98%) offered health benefits, while slightly more than half of small companies (53%) do so.
Among companies that do offer health benefits, the average deductible at a small firm was $2,575 compared to $1,538 at large firms. Among workers with family coverage, the average contribution toward overall premium costs was $7,947 (33%) at small firms compared to $5,697 (23%) at large firms. Among workers with single coverage, the numbers were $1,429 (16%) at small firms compared to $1,204 (14%) at large firms.
The report also found variations in overall premiums and health benefits across nine different industries. For example, healthcare firms paid the highest premiums for family coverage—an average of $26,864—followed by transportation/communications/utilities at $26,601. Companies in agriculture, mining, and construction paid the lowest premiums, an average of $22,654.
There were wide variations by industry in terms of how many firms offer any health benefits. Among state and local government entities, 83% offered health benefits, followed by transportation/communications/utilities (69%), manufacturing (65%), wholesale (62%), healthcare (58%), and finance (56%). Just 40% of retail businesses and 49% of agriculture/mining/construction businesses offered health benefits.
Health Screening Coverage
The KFF report did not include data about insurance coverage for clinical laboratory services. However, one section did address employer willingness to provide opportunities for health screening.
Among large businesses, 56% offered health risk assessments, in which individuals answer questions about their medical history, lifestyle, and other areas relevant to their health risks. A smaller number (44%) offer biometric screening, which “could include meeting a target body mass index (BMI) or cholesterol level, but not goals related to smoking,” the report said. Only 9% of small businesses offered biometric screening, the report found.
KFF conducted its survey between January and July 2024 among a random selection of public and private employers with at least three workers. The survey excluded federal government entities but included state and local government. A total of 2,142 employers responded.
Inflation during this current administration definitely hit consumers in the health insurance premium pocketbook. At the same time providers raised their own prices making it more expensive for people with HDHPs to come up with the cash required by their annual deductible. While clinical laboratory and genetic testing are not highlighted in KFF’s survey, they certainly play a role in increasing costs to healthcare consumers and are worth considering.
Push to expand the reach of health savings plans should help consumers pay for out-of-pocket medical laboratory services and other healthcare expenses
High-deductible health plans (HDHPs) continue to impact hospitals, clinical laboratories, and anatomic pathology groups due to the strain they put on healthcare consumers who struggle to pay their medical bills. Even worse, studies show patients are skipping doctor visits and scheduled medical laboratory tests to avoid paying the full costs of the visits. That’s why the market for Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) has grown in popularity. HSAs enable patients to take control of their healthcare and plan for the inevitable bills.
And grown it has! As of June 30, there were more than 21 million HSAs in the United States, with holdings of about $43 billion in assets. That’s according to a survey by Devenir, a healthcare account investment advisory and research firm. By the end of 2019, Devenir projects the HSA market will exceed $60 billion in assets held in nearly 30 million accounts.
This steep growth curve in HSA accounts is good news for medical laboratories and pathology groups because it indicates consumers are taking advantage of these tax-advantaged savings accounts to set aside funds needed to pay their high-deductible health bills.
HSAs Help Both Patients and Provider, including Medical Laboratories
According to the survey Devenir conducted in July 2017, which primarily reflected data from the largest 100 HSA providers, the typical HSA investment account holder has a $15,146 average total balance in deposits and investments.
“We continue to see impressive HSA growth, especially amongst those HSA assets held in investments as consumers begin to understand how HSAs can help them save for both their current and future healthcare expenses,” noted Jon Robb, Devenir Senior Vice President of Research and Technology, in a statement.
Under current law, HSA accounts must be paired with an HDHP. For 2017, the IRS has defined “high deductible” as any deductible higher than $1,300 for an individual or $2,600 for a family, so a health insurance plan must meet that threshold for a consumer to qualify for an HSA. In addition, annual contributions are capped at $3,400 individuals or $6,750 for families. Those over 55 can contribute an extra $1,000.
Devenir’s study, which drew on data from the period ending June 30, 2017, illustrates the steep growth in HSAs since 2006, and projects the growth to continue well into the decade. (Image copyright: Devenir.)
But a boom in HSA accounts may be on the horizon if Republicans succeed in replacing Obamacare. Provisions of the GOP-backed American Health Care Act (AHCA), which stalled this summer after passing by a narrow vote in the House of Representatives, would nearly double HSA contribution limits and introduce other changes that would spur growth.
“Whatever direction healthcare reform goes, it is clear that the HSA will be a key component of consumers’ financial decisions in healthcare,” wrote Steve Christenson, Executive Vice President at Ascensus, in 401K Specialist. “After all, HSAs and HDHPs were market-driven prior to the enactment of the ACA and continued to be with its passage. The economy will continue to drive this trend as employers seek to attract and retain employees in this tight job market.”
HSA contributions can be invested and grow tax free as long as withdrawals are used for qualified medical expenses. Because accounts move with healthcare consumers if they change jobs or insurers, HSAs are viewed as excellent investment options.
HSAs Great Opportunity for Elderly to Control Their Healthcare
Even if Republicans fail to revamp healthcare, HSA industry leaders are expected to continue to look for ways to expand into additional markets. According to a Kaiser Health News article, companies that manage HSA accounts are “eager to reach new markets, including baby boomers in Medicare and enrollees in the military’s Tricare system, for whom—under current law—HSAs are off-limits.”
Eric Remjeske, President and co-founder of Devenir, believes those over 65 would seize upon an opportunity to use an HSA account to help offset Medicare’s cost sharing expenses.
“That is a great population that has the potential to save and really take more control over their healthcare,” Remjeske told Kaiser Health News.
Industry officials are confident HSAs will continue their upward trajectory, attracting new customers and additional healthcare dollars.
“The political and economic winds are favorable and most definitely pushing HSAs,” Kevin Robertson, Senior Vice President and Chief Revenue Officer for HSA Bank, the industry’s third-largest company, told Kaiser Health News.
What’s good for the HSA industry also may prove to be good for medical laboratories. If more healthcare consumers turn to HSAs to pay their out-of-pocket medical costs, including clinical laboratory services, the fear that increased enrollment in high-deductible plans will cause a reduction in the utilization of clinical lab tests may prove to be unfounded.
Pathologists and clinical laboratory managers need to understand the reasons why different consumers have entirely different financial experiences with the health insurance obtained under the ACA
One of the interesting consequences of the Affordable Care Act is that there are different classes of consumers who have completely different experiences with the health insurance coverage obtained through the ACA’s health insurance exchanges. It is important for pathologists as well as clinical laboratory managers to understand this fascinating outcome from the Affordable Care Act.
On one end of the spectrum are consumers who—because their income is at or just above the poverty line—get ACA health insurance coverage with full or nearly all of the premium subsidized be the federal government. They are the happiest with the law. That is, until they need to pay deductibles of as much as $5,000 per year for individuals and $10,000 per year for a family.
At the other end of the spectrum are the consumers with incomes at or above the 400% of the poverty level. Because these individuals get little or no federal premium subsidy, they are stuck paying the full price of their health insurance coverage. It is this group that is most unhappy with the ACA. And, not only are they paying hefty monthly premiums for coverage, they are also stuck with the $5,000 and $10,000 annual deductible requirements. (more…)
Now in its fifth year, Indiana’s CDHP now covers 90% of eligible state employees
Many pathologists and clinical laboratory managers are carefully watching for evidence that new healthcare delivery models can deliver improved patient outcomes at a lower cost. Now comes evidence that a consumer-directed health plan (CDHP) for Indiana state employees—that incentivizes consumers to manage their healthcare dollars more carefully—is saving money for both employees and the state.
According to a story in the Centre Daily Times (CDT), state officials in Indiana claim that the state’s CDHP has reduced the state’s overall health benefit costs and met with high subscriber satisfaction.
Governor Mitch Daniels and other Indiana officials claim that, since introducing the CDHP in 2006, the Hoosier state’s overall health benefit costs are down by more than 10%, with only 2% of subscribers switching back to a traditional plan, the CDT reporter wrote.
Clinical laboratories can provide that missing education about CDHPs to patients
Even as enrollment in Consumer-Directed Health Plans (CDHPs) and Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) climbs steadily year after year, a new study reveals that most physicians are unprepared to help their patients understand and better use these forms of health insurance. This is a barrier to CDHP acceptance and an opportunity for clinical laboratories.
CDHPs—and their close cousins, HDHPs (high-deductible health plans_—are designed to shift more responsibility for healthcare decisions to patients. Many physicians, however, are unprepared to advise patients enrolled in CDHPs about cost-effective treatment options. This is the finding of a 2008 survey of 525 randomly selected doctors published in the American Journal of Managed Care. Nearly half, 43%, of doctors responding to the survey admitted knowing “a little” or “not at all” about CDHPs or HSAs. At least 33% of surveyed physicians said they are “somewhat” knowledgeable. Only 24% of physicians surveyed claimed “much” or “a great deal” of knowledge about CDHPs.
