New ranking highlights the pathologists with the biggest social media reach—and what their influence means for diagnostics, research, and industry engagement.
A new analysis identifies the most influential US pathologists on Twitter/X, highlighting a growing link between social media reach and clinical impact.
The ranking, based on follower counts, spotlights pathologists who have built substantial audiences across subspecialties including dermatopathology, hematopathology, neuropathology, pulmonary pathology, and gastrointestinal pathology.
Topping the list is Jerad M. Gardner, MD (50.5K followers), a leading dermatopathologist known for his extensive educational content. He’s followed by Malak Althgafi, MBBS-MD, MBA (43.1K), Chair of Pathology at Tufts Medical Center, and Sanjay Mukhopadhyay, MD (34.6K), Director of Pulmonary Pathology at Cleveland Clinic.
The New Value of Visibility for Today’s Pathologists
While the list is not exhaustive, it illustrates the rising importance of digital visibility in pathology.
For pathologists, this list offers more than a snapshot of who’s popular online—it reflects how the profession itself is evolving. Social platforms have become powerful spaces for case sharing, rapid education, research dissemination, and community building across institutions and subspecialties.
As digital influence grows, so does the opportunity for pathologists to shape public understanding of diagnostics, mentor the next generation, and amplify their own work. Whether you’re looking to learn, collaborate, or simply see how peers are using these tools, understanding who leads the conversation can help decide how and where one wants to engage next.
This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.
Danaher’s chief medical officer, Maximilian Schmid, says ‘infrastructure is there’ to push forward whole slide imaging.
Based on discussions at the recent Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine’s (ADLM) 2025 conference and observations from other sources, digital pathology trends continue to show sluggish adoption by clinical laboratories and anatomic pathology practices in the US. However, proponents of whole slide imaging say now is a prime opportunity to integrate the technology with a patient-centric care approach.
At least 65 vendors at the ADLM 2025 exhibitor hall indicated that their products touched whole slide imaging or digital pathology, showing this area is a hot focus for sellers.
Based on its customers, Leica has one of the largest installation bases of digital pathology scanners in the world. From that perspective, the technology is available, yet obstacles remain.
“The infrastructure is there,” said Maximilian Schmid, MD, chief medical officer at Danaher Diagnostics. “How do we bring it to the patients?”
Danaher Corporation, which held a press briefing at ADLM 2025, is parent company to Leica.
ADLM 2025 took place in Chicago July 27-31at McCormick Place. (Photo credit: Scott Wallask.)
Labcorp Report Notes Costs as a Barrier
Anyone who has followed the slow progression of digital pathology knows adoption from the diagnostic lab industry has been lukewarm. In 2024, Labcorp released a report about clinical laboratory trends that indicated cost remained a hurdle to further use of digital pathology scanners and software. Based on a survey of 115 US-based pathologists, lab managers, and lab directors, the report concluded that just 33% of respondents had started orplanned to implementdigital pathologyin lab workflows.
“Industry adoption of digital pathology has been slower than expected, largely due to high initial costs,” Deborah Sesok-Pizzini, MD, MBA, chief medical officer at Labcorp, told Today’s Clinical Lab at the time. That publication is a partner brand to Dark Daily.
Digital Pathology Trends are Rosier in Europe
Leica has been able to convey a message to its customers that despite the initial costs, the return on investment for digital pathology is high in terms of more accurate diagnoses and quicker processes, Schmid said.
“When I look ahead 10 years, digital pathology will be as normal to labs as H&E staining,” he predicted, referring to common hematoxylin and eosin stains.
He added that while Labcorp’s study reflected US trends, digital pathology adoption is stronger elsewhere, based on what Danaher and Leica see with customers.
“Europe seems to be a little bit ahead in terms digitization,” including with whole-slide imaging, he noted. However, even in the US, “academic medical centers are moving very fast in this direction.”
Schmid’s assertion about Europe is supported by other sources. For example, a business case published in July 2024 by the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) for Wales indicated that Northern Ireland and Scotland had near-fully digitized cellular pathology programs for the NHS, and England was building up its network. Wales was seen as trailing behind these countries.
“The national move towards scanning of histological material for primary diagnosis and more recently, the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)/computational pathology to improve the accuracy, reliability and quality of reports, means that most pathologists, especially new trainees who are already using digital technology, will, in the future, choose to work in departments where digital technology will enhance and underpin their diagnosis thus benefiting the quality of patient care,” the NHS Wales business case paper stated.
Computational Pathology’s Growing Role
Computational pathology—in other words, the use of data science, information, and digital technologies for laboratory medicine—is a key to moving precision medicine forward via digital pathology, said Nicole Selenko-Gebauer, MD, MBA, group vice president and chief innovation officer at Danaher Diagnostics.
“We need to complement technology-driven focuses” with a patient-centric approach, Selenko-Gebauer added.
Even in 2022, The Dark Report had alerted its readers to the promise of computational pathology, noting Mayo Clinic Laboratories’ early success in launching related clinical assessment goals based on digital pathology and artificial intelligence. (If you’re not a Dark Report subscriber, check out our 14-day free trial.)
Taken at that viewpoint, digital pathology trends related to patient care will be an important milestone for the technology.
“A pivotal moment will be the clinical utilization of digital pathology—that it works and is accurate,” Schmid said.
