News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel
Sign In

‘Intelligent Microscopes’ Controlled by AI Record Biological Events That Happen Faster than Humans Can Record

New study shows how artificial neural networks are leading to improved microscopic capabilities and precision that could help researchers better understand causes of tumors

Biophysicists at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) in Switzerland have developed a method for using artificial neural networks to automate control of clinical laboratory microscopes involved in a range of diagnostic testing.

Pathologists, microbiologists, and clinical laboratory scientists engaged in research into cellular activity will be interested to learn that advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are leading to new opportunities for future research studies to observe and capture—in real time—biological processes in living cells/samples.

“EPFL biophysicists have now found a way to automate microscope control for imaging biological events in detail while limiting stress on the sample, all with the help of artificial neural networks. Their technique works for bacterial cell division, and for mitochondrial division,” according to

Even better, the EPFL scientists are making the control framework available as an open-source software plug-in for the microscope control program Micro-Manager. This enables clinical laboratories to integrate artificial intelligence into existing microscope control software, noted.

The researchers published their findings in the journal Nature Methods, titled, “Event-Driven Acquisition for Content-Enriched Microscopy.”

“An intelligent microscope is kind of like a self-driving car. It needs to process certain types of information, subtle patterns that it then responds to by changing its behavior,” Suliana Manley, PhD, biophysicist and a professor in the Laboratory of Experimental Biophysics at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, told Clinical laboratories and anatomic pathology groups may want to explore the capabilities of this intelligent microscope technology. (Photo copyright: EPFL.)

EPFL Study Breakdown

Suliana Manley, PhD, biophysicist, professor, and head of the Laboratory of Experimental Biophysics at the EPFL, is the principal investigator of the “Intelligent microscope” study. She has spent her career focusing on the development of high-resolution optical instruments and the organization and dynamics of proteins.

Manley and her team learned how to detect mitochondrial divisions in bacteria such as Caulobacter Crescentus. These divisions can occur once every few minutes, but last only seconds. Their infrequency and ability to occur anywhere within the mitochondrial network makes them difficult to spot and photograph, Physics World noted.

To overcome this barrier, the EPFL team trained the neural network to look for mitochondrial constrictions—the shape change in mitochondria that leads to division—and combined that data with observations of the protein DRP1, the presence of which is required for spontaneous divisions to occur, reported.

“A common goal of fluorescence microscopy is to collect data on specific biological events. Yet, the event-specific content that can be collected from a sample is limited, especially for rare or stochastic processes,” wrote the EPFL scientists in their Nature Methods paper. “We developed an event-driven acquisition framework, in which neural-network-based recognition of specific biological events triggers real-time control in an instant structured illumination microscope … we capture mitochondrial and bacterial divisions at imaging rates that match their dynamic timescales, while extending overall imaging durations. Because event-driven acquisition allows the microscope to respond specifically to complex biological events, it acquires data enriched in relevant content.”

Manley’s intelligent fluorescent microscope responds more rapidly than human control can achieve. When the microscope senses constrictions and DRP1 protein levels are high, it switches into high-speed image capture mode and gathers multiple images with minute detail. Conversely, when both constrictions and protein are low, the microscope goes into low-speed imaging mode, which preserves the integrity of the sample by avoiding excessive exposure to light, noted.

Automating microscope control limits the stress placed on samples, increasing the likelihood of more accurate results. It also allows microscope control for imaging biological events in detail, as it eliminates human error that naturally occurs from trying to keep up with events in real time, reported.

“Using a neural network, we can detect much more subtle events and use them to drive changes in acquisition speed,” Manley told “The potential of intelligent microscopy includes measuring what standard acquisitions would miss. We capture more events, measure smaller constrictions, and can follow each division in greater detail.”

What’s Next for EPFL?

Manley and her EPFL team plan to continue working with neural networks to detect different events and bring about different hardware responses.

“For example, we envision harnessing optogenetic perturbations to modulate transcription at key moments in cell differentiation,” she told Physics World. “We also think of using event detection as a means of data compression, selecting for storage or analysis the pieces of data that are most relevant to a given study.” 

As research continues in bacterial cell division, there will be a point where the technology enables researchers to observe cell activity and what conditions cause abnormal (tumor) cells to be created. That would be the first step to then investigating ways to stop the cellular process that creates abnormal cells.

It should not surprise pathologists and clinical laboratory managers that researchers and technology developers are exploring ways to “turbocharge” classic light microscopy. Advances in image analysis, combined with machine learning algorithms, are making it possible to tease new insights from the images viewed with a standard microscope.

—Kristin Althea O’Connor

Related Information:

Intelligent Microscope Uses AI to Capture Rare Biological Events

Intelligent Microscopes for Detecting Rare Biological Events

Event-Driven Acquisition for Content-Enriched Microscopy

Smarter Microscopes

Might Phlebotomy Become Fully Automated? Dutch Company Is Working to Develop World’s First Autonomous Blood-drawing Station

Should this AI-driven technology prove viable in clinical settings, it could contribute to easing the shortage of qualitied phlebotomists for medical laboratories worldwide

Could phlebotomists one day be out of a job? If European medical technology company Vitestro has its way, that could someday become a reality in European hospitals and in clinical laboratories worldwide. Headquartered in the Netherlands, the company has raised EUR 12.7 million ($14,057,947.50 US) in Series A financing to bring to market “the world’s first autonomous blood drawing device,” BioWorld Med Tech reported.

According to Vitestro’s website, the “device combines AI-based, ultrasound-guided 3D reconstruction with robotic needle insertion, ensuring accurate and secure blood collection. The procedure is performed fully automatically, from tourniquet to bandage application.”

This is another example of how artificial intelligence companies are finding opportunities in staffing shortages the healthcare industry is experiencing globally. In this case, the novel technology could help address the lack of qualified phlebotomists. And clinical laboratories around the world could become the proving grounds for new AI-driven devices that end up replacing human healthcare workers.

Toon Overbeeke

“This financing round marks a new phase of growth for Vitestro which brings the company closer to its mission of improving the venipuncture procedure for hundreds of millions of patients per year,” said Vitestro CEO and co-founder Toon Overbeeke (above), in a press release. “We look forward to growing the business and transforming patient care with Sonder Capital, leveraging their expertise in successfully commercializing medical robotic technologies.” If proven viable, clinical laboratories around the world suffering from shortages of phlebotomists could benefit from AI-driven autonomous blood draw stations. (Photo copyright: LinkedIn.)

Next Evolution for Clinical Laboratories

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there are 14 billion clinical laboratory tests ordered annually in the US and 70% of medical decisions depend on laboratory results. One of the more common clinical laboratory procedures—venous blood draws—is pivotal in clinical diagnostics, but a worldwide shortage of skilled phlebotomists is having an impact on this critical testing method. 

With the announcement of its completion of a EUR 12.7-million Series A financing round to bring the “world’s first” autonomous blood draw device to market, Vitestro seems poised to impact both the shortage and the job prospects of existing phlebotomists. This financing round was led by San Carlos, California-based Sonder Capital and included investors with experience in the clinical laboratory and medical technology industries. 

“Automating this ubiquitous procedure is the next evolution for clinical laboratories, allowing them to improve quality of care for patients while building a more sustainable operation,” stated Andy McGibbon, Managing Partner at Sonder Capital in a March press release

According to Investopedia, Series A financing refers to “an investment in a privately-held start-up company after it has shown progress in building its business model and demonstrates the potential to grow and generate revenue. It often refers to the first round of venture money a firm raises after seed and angel investors.”

Vitestro says it will utilize the capital from this financing round to accelerate production development, prepare market authorization in the European Union, and initiate production. 

Vitestro's autonomous blood drawing machine

Vitestro’s autonomous blood drawing device prototype (above) has been tested on more than 1,000 volunteers and patients. Vitestro plans to continue its studies on the device this year and anticipates entering the European market with the device sometime in 2024. Development of this technology is something that phlebotomists and clinical laboratory managers will want to track. (Photo copyright: Vitestro.)

Coming to a Clinical Laboratory Near You

“Medical robotics will make optimal outcomes available to everyone. I strongly believe Vitestro will set the world standard in autonomous blood drawing,” said Fred Moll, MD, Managing Partner of Sonder Capital in the press release. Moll, who has been heralded as the “father of robotic surgery,” was also appointed as a non-executive board member of Vitestro. Moll co-founded Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Hansen Medical, Restoration Robotics, and Auris Health (acquired by Ethicon, a Johnson and Johnson company).

On April 12, Vitestro announced that leading Dutch clinical laboratory OLVG Lab will be the first healthcare provider to begin using their blood-drawing device. A number of hospitals, clinical laboratories, and blood drawing departments are preparing to use the device and OLVG Lab plans to have the system fully operational by late next year, according to a press release. OLVG lab provides laboratory services to hospitals, clinics, and care providers in the greater Amsterdam area. 

“Robotization has become an important topic in diagnostics. Vitestro’s technology will improve the standardization and optimization of the sampling procedure. And it helps solve staff shortages in our blood drawing department,” said Anja Leyte, director of OLVG Lab, in the press release. “But more importantly, the patients are also very positive. Our staff are really enthusiastic as well and can’t wait to start using this breakthrough technology in our healthcare.”

Vitestro’s device is still in the testing phase but could prove to be very beneficial to clinical laboratories and help alleviate the shortage of trained phlebotomists. An automated blood draw machine might also improve the consistency of the blood draw experience for both patients and healthcare professionals.   

—JP Schlingman

Related Information:

Vitestro Raises EUR 12 Million in Series A Financing Round to Bring the World’s First Autonomous Blood Drawing Device to the European Market

Amsterdam-based OLVG Lab Adopts Vitestro’s Autonomous Blood Drawing Devices

Rutgers University Researchers Develop Desktop Venipuncture Robot Capable of Drawing Blood Samples and Rendering Analyses Outside of Medical Laboratories

Artificial Intelligence and Computational Pathology

Balwani and Holmes’ Personal Relationship Takes Center Stage in Criminal Trial, Fueling Continued Public Interest in Theranos Fraud Saga

Even as Balwani’s trial moves ahead, Hulu’s miniseries ‘The Dropout’ chronicles the pair’s romance and the company’s downfall while providing controversial subject matter for various media outlets

Unlike Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes’ criminal trial for fraud which generated daily headlines across the nation, the related fraud trial of ex-Theranos COO Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani is not getting the same news coverage. Therefore, media have shifted their reporting to Balwani’s personal relationship with the Holmes, which is clearly having its moment in the media spotlight.

The release of the Hulu miniseries “The Dropout”—which chronicles Holmes’ failed attempt to revolutionize the clinical laboratory industry by developing a device capable of performing multiple clinical blood tests using a finger-stick of blood—created the initial media and TV-viewer buzz.

Now a diverse range of media, including Fortune, The New York Post, and The Guardian, are turning their attention to the former Theranos executives’ private relationship during the time when they were in charge at the failed medical laboratory company.

As “The Dropout” outlines, Holmes gained celebrity status after dropping out of Stanford University at age 19 and founding Theranos in 2003. Years later, when Theranos claimed its Edison blood-testing device could conduct hundreds of blood tests using a finger-prick of blood, the startup’s valuation soared to nearly $9 billion in 2014, making Holmes a billionaire based on her 50% stake in the company, Investopedia reported.

In “What Happened to Elizabeth Holmes and Sunny Balwani? Where the Shamed Theranos Execs are Today,” Fortune used the release of “The Dropout” to publish an update on Holmes and Balwani. The magazine notes Holmes’ family connections—she was a descendant of the founders of America’s first yeast company and the daughter of a former Enron executive and congressional aide—helped her early efforts at fundraising for Theranos.

Fortune also stated that Holmes’ “pedigreed background” enabled her to attract “luminaries” such as former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and former CDC Director William Foege to the Theranos board and gained her access to high-profile investors.

Ramesh "Sunny" Balwani
In U.S. District Court Northern District of California, ex-Theranos president and COO Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani (above) faces charges for allegedly defrauding patients and investors about Theranos. His defense team has attempted to distance their client from the day-to-day decision-making in the clinical laboratory company, while prosecution witnesses are attempting to show Balwani not only invested money in the startup but orchestrated many of the company’s actions. Balwani has pleaded not guilty to all charges. (Photo copyright: David Paul Morris, Fortune.)

Theranos, Holmes Cloaked in Secrecy, according to Fortune

While Holmes sought the spotlight when promoting Theranos, Fortune maintains the company’s work culture and Holmes herself were clocked in secrecy. The article states Holmes hired bodyguards to serve as her chauffeurs, installed bulletproof glass in her office windows, and did not allow workers in separate departments to discuss projects with one another.

Balwani met Holmes in 2002 while both were studying in Beijing as part of a Mandarin language summer program. He was 37 and married at the time, while Holmes was an 18-year-old high school student. Balwani was attending an MBA program at the University of California, Berkeley, which he entered after selling his shares in software company Commerce One in 2000 for nearly $40 million.

While Balwani had no training in biological sciences or medical devices, Holmes named him president of Theranos in 2009. The pair dated for a dozen years, but they kept their relationship secret from Theranos workers and investors. During Holmes’ fraud trial, Dark Daily reported on their private text message exchanges and her claims against Balwani of “intimate partner abuse.” (See Dark Daily, “Text Messages Between Theranos Founder Elizabeth Holmes and Ex-Boyfriend Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani Grab Headlines in Early Days of Fraud Trial.”)

Their relationship reportedly ended in 2016.

The New York Post reported Balwani sold the upscale Silicon Valley home he previously shared with Holmes for $15.8 million this past January. The 6,800-square-foot, five-bedroom, seven-bathroom house in Atherton, Calif., is a one-acre property, which The Post states was purchased by the couple for $9 million in 2013. Balwani bought out Holmes’ 50% stake in 2018.

Aron Solomon, a Chief Legal Analyst for legal marketing firm Esquire Digital, is not surprised by the interest in all things Theranos-related.

“We are seeing a ton of interest following the Holmes trial, and I don’t think it’s going to go away,” he told The Guardian.

Potential Reason for Delay in Holmes’ Sentencing

Holmes was convicted in January on four counts of fraud, but she is not expected to be sentenced until September. Amanda Kramer, JD, a partner in the White Collar Defense and Investigations practice at Covington and Burling, LLP, and a former federal prosecutor, suggests that Holmes’ sentencing date may have been delayed until after Balwani’s trial due to the potential for new information to come to light.

“It’s not typical for a case to be sentenced eight months out, but this is not a typical case in many senses,” Kramer told NPR. “And some facts established in Balwani’s trial might prove to be relevant in Holmes’ sentencing.”

So, it appears clinical laboratory directors and pathologists may find more interesting insights about the problems at Theranos emerging from court testimony when it is time for Holmes to be sentenced and during the remaining days of Balwani’s trial. Stay tuned. Dark Daily will continue to bring you the relevant facts of the case.

Andrea Downing Peck

Related Information:

What Happened to Elizabeth Holmes and Sunny Balwani? Where the Shamed Theranos Execs Are Today

Theranos Merchandise on eBay Sparks Bloodlust Among Elizabeth Holmes Fans

Theranos: A Fallen Unicorn

Ex-Theranos Boss Sells California Home He Shared with Elizabeth Holmes

Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes to Be Sentenced on Sept. 26

Text Messages Between Theranos Founder Elizabeth Holmes and Ex-Boyfriend Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani Grab Headlines in Early Days of Fraud Trial

Las Vegas Clinical Laboratory UMC Prioritizes STAT Runs, Streamlines Through Consolidation

By automating clinical chemistry and immunoassay testing, clinical laboratory leaders can improve throughput while reducing the stress on staff, laboratory expert says

The American Society for Clinical Pathology regularly conducts a vacancy survey of medical laboratories throughout the US. While the problem of lab department vacancy rates has been ongoing, the last survey reported showed increased rates for laboratory positions across all departments surveyed. Last year, burnout among healthcare workers reached a crisis level, reported Clinical Laboratory News.

As a result, staffing the clinical laboratory with qualified lab professionals resounds as a top concern—and at a time when expectations are perhaps the highest they have ever been for performance in healthcare operations, from general hospitals to the most complex integrated delivery networks.

Even in the midst of the clinical laboratory workforce shortage and chronic strain, laboratory leaders must still improve their labs’ processes and workflows; increase productivity; and expand routine and specialty testing to better serve patient populations.

Faced with unrelenting pressures to do more with less, lab directors are turning to automating certain departments of the laboratory as a way to:

  • Relieve the problems caused by an ongoing workforce shortage;
  • Improve workflows and processes through standardization;
  • Keep lab staff working on the most important tasks; and
  • Enhance the laboratory’s reach and grow the lab business in necessary ways.

How UMC Southern Nevada Prioritized STAT Runs, Consolidated Operations

One case in point highlights the University Medical Center (UMC) of Southern Nevada’s clinical laboratory. Located in Las Vegas, UMC is among the largest public hospitals in the United States. It is part of a recent master-planned Las Vegas Medical District (LVMD), and it is the only Level I trauma center in Nevada.

The laboratory needed to improve turnaround time and expand the test menu, among other goals, explained Scott Keigley, one of two General Laboratory Services Managers at UMC. While limited laboratory automation had already been applied broadly, the lab took its automation initiative one step further by connecting three high-volume automated clinical chemistry and immunoassay analyzers (CC/IA), an automated hematology line, and a coagulation analyzer.

Consolidated automated clinical chemistry and immunoassay analyzer

The University Medical Center of Southern Nevada improved efficiency and
streamlined workflow by integrating a consolidated automated clinical chemistry and immunoassay analyzer (above) into the laboratory’s workflow. (Photo copyright: Siemens Healthineers) 

An immediate benefit that UMC realized was consolidation of clinical lab operations. “Up until implementing our automated platform, we had a dedicated laboratory in our emergency room specifically to triage our emergency room tests,” Keigley explained. “You’re talking about not only a duplication of consumables, resources, and supplies, but also personnel.

“A big part of automating was showing our administration we were going to be able to eliminate that emergency room lab and still turn our results around as quickly and as efficiently without it,” Keigley added.

One of the ways that using an automated platform enabled consolidation of lab operations was by decreasing the turnaround times of STAT samples. “Our STAT turnaround times are way below many of the national thresholds or standards,” Keigley explained. “I’ll use troponin as an example. National threshold is 60 minutes from received to result, but we average about 30 minutes.

“Throughput definitely increased,” Keigley added, emphasizing that this increased throughput was actually accompanied by a reduced workload. “We’ve seen a reduction in the amount of hands-on time required to do the daily maintenance and quality controls. Once the daily maintenance and controls are completed, the chemistry department can usually be run by one person.”

Choosing a Consolidated Automated Chemistry and Immunoassay Platform

Described as flexible for adding components, modular, and scalable, a consolidated clinical chemistry and immunoassay analyzer (CC/IA) can run from 1 million to 3 million tests per year. Designed with innovative technological internal controls and sample handling—and other capabilities that include automated instrument calibration, maintenance, and quality control (QC) functions—the CC/IA platform also works as a standalone and is a first step toward implementing laboratory automation.

At UMC, multiple factors influenced the decision to add the platform, explained Keigley. “One reason was the increased productivity that it (the Atellica Solution) from Siemens Healthineers offers. This technology frees up our techs to do what we went to school to do. I can show anyone how to load samples on these analyzers in five minutes, but that’s not what it’s about.

“We were able to expand our test menu and our services. The platform allowed us to grow.” Keigley estimates that UMC’s test menu grew up to 20% after the change, both expanding the types of testing that could be offered and decreasing the number of send-outs. He estimates that the chemistry lab now processes about 2.6 million reportable results per year.

There were several (QC) features that Keigley believes UMC’s laboratory benefits from. The key QC features Keigley identified include onboard temperature-controlled storage, programmable run times, and barcode-labelled tube options from the control manufacturer that eliminate manual programming.

Operational Evaluation—Nexus Global Solutions, Inc. (Nexus), Plano, TX

While the primary driving factor in UMC’s decision to use the Atellica Solution platform was based on its individual laboratory’s needs, a recent study commissioned by Siemens Healthineers illustrated the benefits of this system.

An operational comparison report by Nexus found that there are multiple advantages associated with this integrated automation platform—as a standalone component—when compared to a similar offering.

Specifically, the Nexus report found:

  • Start-up and maintenance time was almost an hour and a half less;
  • Manual start-up time requirements were 28 minutes, compared to 46 minutes;
  • From 65% to 69% of samples had a faster turnaround time; and
  • A system footprint that used 20square feet less space and four fewer analyzers.

Clinical laboratory leaders can review the methodology and results of the Nexus Global report by clicking on this link:

This article was produced in partnership with Siemens Healthineers.

—Caleb Williams

Related Information:

Vacancy Survey of Medical Laboratories in the United States

Your Burnout is Real

University Medical Center of Southern Nevada

Atellica Solution

American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Siemens Healthineers

Mitchell Cancer Institute in Alabama Combines New Robotic Method for Detecting and Excising Biopsies with Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) to Speed Diagnosis of Lung Cancer

Mitchell Cancer Institute in Alabama Combines New Robotic Method for Detecting and Excising Biopsies with Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) to Speed Diagnosis of Lung Cancer

Combining robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with rapid on-site evaluation by cytopathologists enables cancer evaluation and diagnosis in one procedure

New technologies are making it possible to both collect a tissue biopsy and diagnose lung cancer during the same procedure. Cytopathologist are essential in this unique approach, which has the potential to greatly shorten the time required to diagnose lung cancer.

At USA Health Mitchell Cancer Institute in Alabama, a team consisting of pulmonology, pathology, surgical, and medical oncology specialists can diagnose lung cancer significantly faster thanks to the combining of a robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) system with rapid on-site evaluation of biopsies (ROSE) by a cytopathologist during the same procedure.

The RAB platform was created by Auris Health in Redwood City, Calif. According to a USA Health new release, the Auris Health Monarch “enables physicians to see inside the lung and biopsy hard-to-reach nodules using a flexible endoscope. When combined with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) it allows for diagnosis at the time of bronchoscopy.”

USA Health says it is the only academic health system in Alabama to combine the Auris Health Monarch (Monarch) with ROSE to diagnose lung cancer in a single procedure. 

“Nine-nine percent of the time we make a diagnosis—negative or positive (at time of bronchoscopy). We don’t have to do repeat procedures,” said Elba Turbat-Herrera, MD, Director of Pathological Services at USA Health’s Mitchell Cancer Institute (MCI) and Professor, MCI Interdisciplinary Clinical Oncology, in an exclusive interview with Dark Daily.

The American Society for Cytopathology defines ROSE as “a clinical service provided for patients where a pathologist, or in certain settings, an experienced and appropriately qualified cytotechnologist provides immediate real‐time evaluation of a fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy or touch imprints of a core biopsy.”

As a cytopathologist, Turbat-Herrera performs ROSE during procedures at USA Health. “I think we have improved diagnostics very much. With the Monarch equipment, one can see where the needle is traveling in the bronchial tube. It is more precise,” Turbat-Herrera explained.

Patients Benefit from Robotic-assisted Bronchoscopy

Traditionally, anatomic pathologists receive core (tissue sampling) biopsies and fine-needle aspiration biopsies from doctors looking to determine if a lung nodule may be cancerous. But the procedures to secure the biopsies are invasive and stressful for patients waiting for results from clinical laboratories. And some nodules are difficult for surgeons to reach, which can delay care to patients.

Brian Persing, MD

“The Monarch and ROSE technologies represent a huge step forward in lung bronchoscopy. Being able to see directly inside the lung and evaluate samples immediately provides the most advanced care for patients,” said Brian Persing, MD (above), Medical Oncologist, Mitchell Cancer Institute, and Assistant Professor of Interdisciplinary Clinical Oncology at the University of South Alabama College of Medicine, in the news release. (Photo copyright: University of South Alabama.)

Currently, more than 112 US healthcare providers use the Monarch robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) platform, which garnered US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance in 2018, the USA Health news release noted.

The Monarch platform, according to USA Health, “integrates robotics, micro-instrumentation, endoscope design, and data science into one platform to empower physicians.”

Monarch's "controller-like interface"

Monarch’s “controller-like interface” (seen above) enables physicians to operate the endoscope and access small and “hard-to-reach” lung nodules. “The Monarch platform,” Duluth News Tribune explained, “is an endoscope guided by a handheld controller very similar to an Xbox controller. As the Monarch Platform drives through the lungs, the camera and other diagrams on a screen help the physician locate the nodule, then collect the biopsy with better accuracy and precision.” (Photo copyright: Jed Carlson/Superior Telegram/Duluth News Tribune.)

Eric Swanson, a pulmonologist at Essentia Health-St. Mary’s Medical Center in Duluth, MD, calls Monarch a game changer. “It’s a big, big upgrade from what we had before,” Swanson told the Duluth News Tribune. “(Before), you’d just pass a small catheter through a regular bronchoscope, and you turn it and hope you land in the right spot.”

The Monarch platform has enabled USA Health to step-up diagnosis of lung cancer, as compared to FNA (fine needle aspiration) biopsy on its own, according to Turbat-Herrera.

“With FNA alone, you try to get (sample tissue), and you are not sure. Now, if it is there, you should get it because the (Monarch) equipment helps you get there. Our role in pathology is to help guide the hand of the pulmonologist: ‘you don’t have what we need,’ or ‘keep going in that area of the lung,’” she said, adding that physicians have been able to reach tiny lesions.

High Incidence of Lung Cancer

The American Cancer Society, says lung cancer is the second most common cancer, with an estimated 235,760 new lung cancer cases and 131,880 deaths from the disease in 2021.

It’s hoped that healthcare providers’ investment in new robotic technology—such as Monarch and others—may shorten the time required to diagnose lung cancer and eventually save lives.

Providers such as USA Health go a step further by integrating ROSE with RAB. The robotic technology—coupled with on-site rapid evaluation by a cytopathologist that averts repeat biopsy procedures—immediately secures an assessment of sample adequacy and a cancer diagnosis that may benefit patients as well.  

This is yet another example of how a new technology in one field can have a benefit for anatomic pathologists.   

Donna Marie Pocius

Related Information:

USA Health Mitchell Cancer Institute Offers State-of-the-Art Lung Cancer Diagnosis

FDA Clears Auris Health’s Robotic Monarch Platform for Endoscopy

New Robotic Diagnostic Device Searches for Lung Cancer

High Diagnostic Yield in Sampling Sub-Centimeter Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules with Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy

ASC Rapid On‐Site Evaluation (ROSE) Position Statement

Does the 1918 Influenza Pandemic Teach Us Anything About How and When COVID-19 Will End?

Experts weigh-in on the new Omicron variant, how pandemics conclude, and challenges ahead for clinical laboratories

Could studying how the 1918 influenza pandemic ended teach pathologists and clinical laboratory professionals how and when the current COVID-19 pandemic may end as well? And does the new Omicron variant indicate that the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has mutated into an endemic form of the disease?

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the 1918 influenza (aka, the Spanish Flu) pandemic took place worldwide between 1918 and 1919. It was caused by the H1N1 virus (A/H1N1), a subtype of the Influenza A virus, and infected approximately 500 million people worldwide (a third of the human population at the time). Fifty million people died. Many were children or otherwise healthy individuals, but people from all age groups perished.

The CDC calls the Spanish Flu the “deadliest pandemic of the 20th century.” Past pandemics have generally concluded after 2.5 to 3.5 years. That’s how long it takes for new viruses to mutate and become endemic diseases, Healthline reported.

The COVID-19 pandemic has been around for about that long. It stands to reason the natural end of the COVID-19 pandemic may be just around the corner. But is it? And is the Omicron variant an indicator that the COVID-19 pandemic is winding down?

Fighting a New Coronavirus Variant

A recent McKinsey and Company report notes that, compared to the Delta variant, the new Omicron variant is:

  • 25% more infectious,
  • 25% better at evading immunity, and
  • 25% more likely to cause less severe disease.

“Our analysis suggests that in the US, this combination of characteristics would lead to Omicron replacing Delta as the dominant variant in the next few months and to a higher peak burden of disease than the country saw in the second half of 2021 (but likely below the peak reached in the winter of 2020-21),” the report states.

McKinsey analysts also acknowledged the possible impact of new therapeutics, COVID-19 vaccine booster doses, and public health measures on Omicron spread. “In the short term, an accelerated rollout of booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines is likely to be one of the best protections against an Omicron-fueled wave of the disease,” the analysts wrote.

Does How the Spanish Flu Came to an End Mirror the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Virologists and infectious disease experts explained that the Spanish Flu virus did what viruses still do: mutate and become less dangerous. Herd immunity also helped end the 1918 pandemic. 

“The 1918 influenza virus eventually mutated to the point of not having a high number of deaths—eventually over three years or so. We may very well be witnessing this process with ongoing variants of SARS-CoV-2,” virologist Rodney Rohde, PhD, Director of the Clinical Laboratory Science Program at Texas State University, told Healthline.

Todd Ellerin, MD

Today’s flu strains have “ancestral links” to the 1918 flu, and thus, the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus will most likely also leave its mark, The Boston Herald reported. “The coronavirus will evolve and hopefully morph into a seasonal illness to which we pay little mind, but it’s still too early to tell,” Todd Ellerin, MD (above,) Director of Infectious Diseases, South Shore Health, South Weymouth, Mass., told The Boston Herald. (Photo copyright: Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger.)

“If you think about the way viruses behave, biologically, their reason for living is to replicate and spread, and there’s really no advantage for the virus to kill the host,” infectious disease specialist Keith Armitage, MD, Professor of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases at Case Western Reserve University, told Healthline. “The hope is, that if the pandemic doesn’t go away, we will get new variants that are highly contagious but don’t produce much of a clinical illness,” he added.

In “2021’s Top 10 Lab Stories Confirm Important Trends,” Dark Daily’s sister publication, The Dark Report (TDR), posed a similar question in its number one story of 2021: “COVID-19: Will it Become Endemic and a Respiratory Virus that Shows Up Every Year like Influenza?”

“The question of whether SARS-CoV-2 is a pandemic that fades, as did SARS in 2003, or becomes endemic and a respiratory virus that shows up every season like influenza and the common cold, is of major concern to clinical lab administrators. That’s because clinical labs and pathology groups must continue to serve physicians and patients with the usual menu of routine, reference, and esoteric testing,” TDR noted.

Clinical Laboratories to Continue COVID Testing

It would be most helpful for medical laboratories and pathology groups to have some idea of when the pandemic will end. Unfortunately, such predictions would not be very useful.

“Since COVID-19 infections have a high number of asymptomatic transmitters, we may not fully understand how societal and environmental pressures—masks, distancing, remote working, etc.—on the virus will allow it to evolve,” Rohde told Healthline.

For now, clinical laboratories will need to continue to remain prepared as COVID-19 cases rise and people seek SARS-COV-2 tests, vaccinations, and treatments. COVID-19 testing is likely to be in demand throughout the coming year. The current surge in demand for COVID-19 tests is putting additional stress on the supply chain.

“We know pandemics end; it’s just a matter of time,” Sara Paton, PhD, Associate Professor of Epidemiology, Wright State University, told the Journal-News. “It could be in 2022, maybe later in the year, but I can’t say for sure. It could be 2023.” 

—Donna Marie Pocius

Related Information:

CDC: 1918 Pandemic

What Can We Learn from the 1918 Flu Pandemic as the Omicron Variant Spreads?

The 1918 Pandemic: A Timeline of Events

How Did the 1918 Pandemic End, and Could the Same Thing Happen with Coronavirus?

When Will the COVID-19 Pandemic End?

Will the Pandemic End in 2022?

2021 Top 10 Lab Stores Confirm Important Trends