News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel
Sign In

Keynote Speakers at the Executive War College Describe the Divergent Paths of Clinical Laboratory Testing as New Players Offer Point-of-Care Tests and More Consumers Want Access to Home Tests

27th annual meeting of medical laboratory and pathology managers delivers insights on the path ahead for diagnostics, ranging from the supply chain shortage and the ‘Great Resignation’ to advances in artificial intelligence and whole genome sequencing in service of precision medicine

Divergent paths of diagnostic testing are among the central topics being discussed at the 27th annual Executive War College on Laboratory and Pathology Management happening this week in New Orleans.

What’s coming as healthcare providers move to post-COVID-19 pandemic workflows will be of keen interest to clinical laboratory leaders attending this critical event. Several new and dynamic market changes are reshaping the development of, ordering, and reimbursement for medical laboratory tests. They include:

  • Millennials as change agents in how care is accessed and delivered.
  • New buyers of large volumes of clinical lab tests, such as retail pharmacies.
  • How clinical laboratories can earn new sources of revenue while supporting precision medicine.

Clinical Labs Should Prepare for the ‘Coming Roller Coaster Ride’

Robert L. Michel, Editor-in-Chief of Dark Daily’s sister publication, The Dark Report, and Founder of the Executive War College, described the “coming roller coaster ride” for the pathology and clinical laboratory industries.

Amid the usual operational issues labs deal with (e.g., workforce shortages, supply chain disruptions, regulatory pressures), he noted the emergence of new and powerful forces pulling clinical laboratories and pathology groups in all directions.

“One primary factor is how Millennials will use healthcare differently than Gen Xers and Baby Boomers,” Michel noted. “Similarly, Millennials will make up 75% of the pathologists and the lab workforce by 2025.

“Another major force for change will be new buyers of clinical laboratory tests,” he continued. “For example, expect to see national retail pharmacy chains build thousands of primary care clinics in their retail pharmacies. These clinics will need lab tests and will become major buyers of near-patient analyzers and lab tests.

“A third interesting factor is that a new class of in vitro diagnostics (IVD) manufacturers are developing analyzers and test systems that use minimal amounts of specimens and return answers in minutes. Primary care clinics in retail pharmacies will be interested in buying these lab testing solutions,” Michel concluded.

Robert L. Michel
Robert L. Michel (above), Editor-in-Chief of The Dark Report and Founder of the Executive War College, has studied and worked with leaders of clinical laboratories and pathology groups for more than four decades. During his keynote address, he predicted that powerful economic forces are about to be unleashed on the traditional market for clinical laboratory testing. Those forces include the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in digital pathology, primary care in retail pharmacies, and increased focus on precision medicine. (Photo copyright: The Dark Intelligence Group.)

Peer-to-Peer Learning Opportunities

With approximately 90 presenters scheduled, clinical laboratory leaders from such prestigious institutions as Johns Hopkins Hospital, Mayo Clinic, United Indian Health Services, and more will facilitate peer-to-peer learnings throughout the conference.

In addition, industry executives scheduled to deliver keynotes include Jon Harol, Lighthouse Lab Services Founder and President; Stan Letovsky, PhD, Vice President for AI, Data Sciences and Bioinformatics as well as other executives from Labcorp; and Curtiss McNair II, Vice President and General Manager of Laboratory Services at American Oncology Network.

In addition, several sessions and panel Q/A discussions will cover critical legal and regulatory issues and payer challenges facing the industry.

New Technologies, Workflows, Analytics

The 2022 Executive War College master classes, breakouts, panel discussions, and benefactor sessions will highlight several significant themes:

  • Lab data analytics and utilization. Sessions this year are heavily weighted toward data analytics, aggregation, and utilization. Look for case studies demonstrating the value of lab data, and where and how data has become actionable and monetized. As Dark Daily previously reported, useful data structures have been difficult to achieve for clinical laboratories; however, the case studies featured during this week’s conference will demonstrate signs of progress and highlight lessons learned.
  • Automation. Several case studies are planned that focus on expansion and modernization using laboratory automation. From Butler Health System, an independent hospital system in western Pa., Robert Patterson, MD, Medical Director of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine, and Laboratory Outreach, will detail steps Butler took that enabled its labs to better compete with other area health systems and national reference laboratories. Likewise, Eric Parnell, System Supervisor of Microbiology for Bronson Healthcare in southern Mich., will discuss his lab’s transition to and implementation of total laboratory automation.
  • Genetic testing and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Quickly becoming the foundational disruptor technology on which many new and powerful clinical laboratory tests and procedures are based, genomic testing has now become accessible and affordable. Many clinical laboratories and pathology groups are using molecular diagnostics testing to deliver clinical value to referring physicians.

Other sessions include:

  • Launching and scaling clinical NGS testing in a clinical environment (featuring a project at Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego).
  • How labs and payers can work together to achieve better outcomes and health equity using genomic testing.
  • Effective ways to repurpose PCR and other genetic test instruments to build specimen volume and increase lab revenue.

Paths Forward for Clinical Labs and Pathology Groups

Another important topic being discussed at the 2022 Executive War College is how to position clinical laboratories and pathology groups for the next phase of modern healthcare.

Legal experts and consultants from McDonald Hopkins LLC, Advanced Strategic Partners, Pathology Practice Advisors, and ECG Management Consultants, among others, will answer questions on:

  • Attracting capital for clinical labs and pathology groups.
  • Emerging concepts in growth strategies.
  • Business valuation factors.
  • Unexpected disruptions during sales closings.

These are just a few highlights of the informative sessions and expert speakers scheduled during this week’s 27th annual Executive War College in New Orleans. Look for more coverage in Dark Daily during the days ahead and in upcoming editions of our sister publication The Dark Report.

Full details about the 2022 Executive War College can be found by clicking on this link. (Or copy/paste this URL into your web browser: http://www.executivewarcollege.com.)

Speakers, session topics, and the conference agenda can be viewed by clicking on this link. (Or copy/paste this URL into your web browser: https://executivewarcollege.darkintelligencegroup.com/executive-war-college-agenda-2022.)

—Liz Carey

Related Information:

Executive War College on Lab and Pathology Management

Executive War College: Efficient Data Structure Can Bring in More Reimbursement Dollars and Allow Clinical Laboratories to Sell Aggregated Information

Executive War College: Efficient Data Structure Can Bring in More Reimbursement Dollars and Allow Clinical Laboratories to Sell Aggregated Information

Speakers at this week’s Executive War College in San Antonio explained that the way records are collected and stored plays a large part in the long-term usefulness of clinical laboratory data

Data structure as a term may not flow off the lips of clinical laboratory and pathology laboratory managers, but it should be top-of-mind. Well-structured data improves reimbursements and, in aggregated form, can be an enticing avenue to partnerships with outside parties.

Data structure refers to the makeup of digital records—in other words, how data is collected, stored, and accessed. Structured information offers consistency and is easier to analyze and share.

However, data structure often is difficult to achieve for clinical laboratories, according to Patricia Goede, PhD, Vice President, Clinical Informatics, at XIFIN, Inc. She spoke Tuesday during this year’s Executive War College Conference on Laboratory and Pathology Management in San Antonio. The conference concludes today.

“You have to make sense of all that messy data, and that’s a heavy lift,” she said. “Results are not standardized.”

Appeals Payments Increase with More Clinical Data

Data quality can improve claim reimbursement appeals, Goede noted. When a more complete clinical record is provided to payors, they are more likely to reimburse for services.

According to information Goede covered along with Julie Ramage, Director of Precision Medicine Quality Initiatives and Partnerships at biopharmaceutical company AstraZeneca, when appealing a denied claim for a colon cancer molecular test, for example, the average appeal payment was $318 without cross-specialist clinical records.

Meanwhile, payment for a similar claim appeal which included that added data jumped to $612!

Goede and Ramage shared their knowledge and experiences during their EWC presentation, “New Ways to Add Value! What Innovative Labs and Collaborating Physician Groups Are Doing Today to Provide Aggregated Data Sets to Big Pharma, Bioresearch, and Oncology Centers.”

Structured data that ties in information from the ordering physician helps increase those appeal payments, Goede said, citing research published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, titled, “Laboratory and Clinical Data Integration: Toward an Evidence Development Framework.”

Other useful clinical data for reimbursement appeals include:

  • Demographics,
  • Medical history,
  • Patient family history,
  • Prior clinical laboratory test results, and
  • Predicted impact of medical treatment.

This information is often available, but may not be structured in a way that makes it easy to share with a payer. “You really have to be thinking about what elements you need,” Goede said.

Market for Structured, Anonymized Lab Data

Clinical laboratories that want to provide or sell anonymized, aggregated data to outside parties—such as research firms or pharmaceutical companies—also need to pursue efficient data structure. The re-use of existing, high-quality lab data can create a new business revenue stream.

“But it has to be more than that vanilla, male/female, date-of-birth stuff,” Ramage noted.

For example, she said, genetic testing builds up data registries, and that’s what pharma is looking for to find patients early on.

“If you don’t have a way to structure your data, you’re not going to be able to play in the sandbox,” she added.

Co-presenters Julie Ramage and Patricia Goede, PhD

Co-presenters Julie Ramage (left), Director of Precision Medicine Quality Initiatives and Partnerships at AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, and Patricia Goede, PhD (right), Vice President of Clinical Informatics at XIFIN, Inc., answer attendee questions about data structure during their presentation at this week’s Executive War College Conference on Laboratory and Pathology Management in San Antonio. To register for EWC 2022 and receive a special early-bird rate, click here by November 6.

How Clinical Laboratories Can Improve Clinical Data Structure

Here are some tips for clinical laboratory executives to consider as they tackle data structure:

  • Standardize how to enter patient information and test results. A common problem with data input is that the same information is entered differently over time. For example, various patient records might refer to dates in different ways: November 1, 2021, can also be entered as 11/1/21, 11/1/2021, or 11-01-21. Structured data uses a single way to list dates in records. This lesson applies to all similar clinical data.
  • Use dropdown menu choices instead of free-typing, open fields. An online box to enter a test result can create a variety of entries that affect data structure. While not perfect, drop-down options create a consistent set of entries, Goede said.
  • Ask patient advocacy groups about common nomenclature. Clinical laboratory data should reflect how patients speak, Ramage said. For example, do patients refer to genomic and genetic testing as the same thing? Establishing more consistency improves data structure as records are updated.
  • Enlist your organization’s IT or research team for help. Tech workers and principal investigators can easily look at clinical laboratory data and tell what information is missing or inconsistent, said Cheryl Schleicher, Director of IT Strategy at Northwell Health Labs in Lake Success, NY. Schleicher attended this week’s Executive War College.

Look Further into Clinical Laboratory Data Structure

Data structure can help clinical laboratories and pathology laboratories grab more reimbursement dollars and potentially sell anonymized data to external partners.

It is an area many lab executives are not familiar with and need to investigate more, particularly following the accelerated move to digital lab services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your organization’s IT department or Chief Information Officer can be a useful ally.

If you could not make it to this week’s Executive War College, then join us for our next Executive War College on April 27-28, 2022, in New Orleans. Click here to take advantage of special early-bird pricing for this critical event.

Scott Wallask

Related Information:

With Consumer Demand for Ancestry and Genealogy Genetic Tests Waning, Leading Genomics Companies are Investigating Ways to Commercialize the Aggregated Genetics Data They Have Collected

Recent Acquisitions by Roche Highlight the Importance of Structured Data and Concerns for Diagnostics Providers and Pathology Laboratories

FTC Orders Hospital, Health System, and Five Insurers in Two States to Share Vast Amounts of Data on Their Customers and on Past Acquisitions and Mergers

PAMA Price Reporting Update: What to Watch for During Data Validation

Unstructured Data Is a Target for New Collaboration Involving IBM’s Watson Health and Others; Could Help Pathologists and Radiologists Generate New Revenue

Concert Genetics, XIFIN, Bruce Quinn, MD, PhD, and The Dark Report to Update Clinical Laboratory Professionals on the State of the Genetic Testing Marketplace

Physician use of genetic tests continues to grow at robust rates, even during the pandemic, but uncertainty about managed care reimbursement hangs over the market

It may surprise many pathologists and clinical laboratory managers to learn that the market for genetic testing is robust and growing swiftly, even in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time, the explosion in both the number of unique genetic tests available to physicians, and the willingness of doctors to order genetic tests for their patients, are creating major challenges for both government and private payers. 

Moreover, how payers are attempting to gain control over this boom in genetic testing is creating serious problems for genetic testing companies seeking reimbursement for their test claims. This is because health insurers are taking aggressive steps to control their spending on genetic tests. Some of those steps include:

  • Prior-authorization requirements for an ever-larger number of genetic tests.
  • Reducing the prices paid for high-cost genetic tests.
  • Tough audits that use sampling and extrapolation and produce sizeable recoupment demands.

Unexpected Developments in Genetic Test Marketplace

These are reasons why clinical laboratories need to fully understand the state of the genetic testing market. Physicians are receptive to ordering genetic tests that will improve the care they provide their patients. But health insurers want better control over the unplanned and substantial increases in the total amount of money they pay out for the surging number of genetic test claims.

Collectively, these developments confront genetic testing companies with a mix of good news and bad news. The good news is that more physicians are using genetic tests in their daily medical practice. The bad news is that many payers are erecting ever-more restrictive hurdles that labs must overcome when submitting genetic test claims and seeking adequate payment.

To help executives and molecular pathologists from genetic testing laboratories understand the forces now shaping genetic testing in the United States, Dark Daily is presenting a special webinar, titled, “State of the Genetic Testing Marketplace–Getting Paid for All Your Lab’s Genetic Test Claims: What’s Changing, What’s Not, and What’s Working Best.” This webinar—which includes a panel discussion and live Q/A session— will take place on Thursday, March 25, 2021, at 1:00 PM EDT.

Strategic Insights into What’s Changing with Genetic Testing

This webinar will be one of the most important strategic assessments of genetic testing presented to the clinical laboratory and diagnostics industries since the COVID-19 pandemic began last March. Your presenters are recognized thought-leaders in the genetic testing and laboratory medicine industries. Speaking in order are:

  • Bruce Quinn, MD, PhD, Principal, Bruce Quinn Associates LLC, Los Angeles: An expert in how Medicare and private payers establish coverage guidelines and prices for new genetic tests, Dr. Quinn will explain the key differences in how private payers are managing genetic test utilization and payment, compare to the federal Medicare program.
  • Heather Agostinelli, Asst. Vice President, Strategic Revenue Operations, XIFIN Inc., San Diego: Heather will provide a detailed perspective on the daily actions by payers as they process claims and issue payment for genetic tests. She will also present recommendations for how labs can optimize the number of clean genetic test claims, thus helping shorten payment times in ways that improve cash flow.
  • Rob Metcalf, CEO, Concert Genetics, Nashville, Tenn.: He will discuss the scope and scale of the explosion in the number of genetic test claims by sharing data, charts, and analyses usually only available to clients.

Your Chair and Moderator will be Robert L. Michel, Editor-in-Chief of The Dark Report.

Bruce Quinn, MD, PhD,  Heather Agostinelli, and Rob Metcalf headshots
On Thursday, March 25, at 1:00 PM EDT, Bruce Quinn, MD, PhD, (left), Heather Agostinelli (center), and Rob Metcalf (right) will present “State of the Genetic Testing Marketplace–Getting Paid for All Your Lab’s Genetic Test Claims: What’s Changing, What’s Not, and What’s Working Best.” Molecular pathologists, financial analysts, and managed care and clinical laboratory executives will gain a critical understanding of how COVID-19 is shaping the future of genetic testing and learn how to navigate federal regulations and payer claims processing. (Photo copyright, Dark Daily.)

The purpose of the upcoming webinar includes helping attendees with the following and more:

  • Learn why payers must now deal with more than 1,000 new genetic testing products launching every month and how that complicates claims processing.
  • Understand how the variation in CPT coding by different genetic testing labs complicates claims processing by payers.
  • Learn why “benefit investigation” is already a huge factor as consumers seek the lab with the cheapest genetic test price before they agree to be tested.
  • Master the art of working with prior authorization programs and know why having documents prior to authorization still does not necessarily mean the payer will reimburse for a genetic test claim.
  • Understand Medicare’s policy changes at the national level for genetic tests.
  • Know the core elements of the Medicare MolDx program that gov-erns genetic test claims across 28 states.
  • Be prepared to use the Operation Double Helix court documents as the road map to identify the genetic tests and CPT codes that federal prosecutors use to guide their enforcement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, and the Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act (EKRA).

Valuable Information for Financial Analysis, Managed Care Executives

In addition to bringing clinical pathologists and directors/managers of clinical laboratories up to date on the genetic testing marketplace, this webinar will provide valuable insights into financial analysts’ tracking of genetic testing companies, managed care executives’ handling of genetic testing claims, genetic counselors, and others involved in managing clinical service lines that utilize genetic tests in patient care.

Click here for full details or to register for the March 25 webinar, “State of the Genetic Testing Marketplace–Getting Paid for All Your Lab’s Genetic Test Claims: What’s Changing, What’s Not, and What’s Working Best.” Or copy and paste this URL into your browser: https://www.darkdaily.com/webinar/state-of-the-genetic-testing-marketplace-getting-paid-for-all-your-labs-genetic-test-claims-whats-changing-whats-not-and-whats-working-best/.

—Michael McBride

Related Information:

State of the Genetic Testing Marketplace–Getting Paid for All Your Lab’s Genetic Test Claims: What’s Changing, What’s Not, and What’s Working Best

Stark Law and Anti-kickback Statute to Encourage Value-Based Care and Reduce Technical Trip Wires

Federal Anti-Kickback Statute Final Rule

Physician Self-Referral Stark Law Final Rule

S.3254 – Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act of 2018

Federal Law Enforcement Action Involving Fraudulent Genetic Testing Results in Charges Against 35 Individuals Responsible for Over $2.1 Billion in Losses in One of the Largest Health Care Fraud Schemes Ever Charged

Where Are the Patients? Hospitals and Clinical Laboratories Wonder When Routine Surgeries, Procedures, and Testing Can Be Restarted Once the COVID-19 Outbreak Eases

Even as some states lift stay-at-home orders, clinical laboratories and pathology groups face uncertainty about how quickly routine daily test referrals will return to normal, pre-pandemic levels

Although strokes and heart attacks do not take vacations, a large and growing number of patients with serious health issues who—in normal times—would require immediate attention are not contacting providers to get needed care. Instead, they are avoiding hospital emergency rooms and clinical laboratories for fear they’ll contract the COVID-19 coronavirus.

Starting in early March, hospitals nationwide suspended elective surgeries and procedures and reduced non-COVID-19 inpatient care to make beds available for the predicted on-rush of COVID-19 patients. However, in parts of the country, the predicted high demand for hospital beds and ventilators failed to materialize. Additionally, due to shelter-in-place orders, patients in many states postponed routine office visits with their primary care physicians.

The collective collapse in the number of elective services provided by hospitals, and the fall-off in patients visiting their doctors, is crushing the financial stability of the nation’s clinical laboratory industry.

In, “From Mid-March, Labs Saw Big Drop in Revenue,” Dark Daily’s sister publication, The Dark Report (TDR) reported on the revenue challenges facing clinical pathology groups and clinical laboratories. Kyle Fetter, Executive Vice President and General Manager of Diagnostic Services at XIFIN, a revenue cycle management company, told TDR that starting in the third week of March, labs suffered a steep decline in routine testing. By the end of March, that fall-off in revenue ranged from 44% for some AP specimens to 70% to 80% for some specialty AP work. During these same weeks, XIFIN’s data showed clinical labs experienced a drop in routine testing volume of 58%, hospital outreach testing declined by 61%, and molecular lab volume went down by 52%.

Using data from multiple sources, The Dark Report estimates that—compared to pre-pandemic levels—the clinical laboratory profession lost almost $900 million in revenue each week—or about $5.2 billion as of April 26. (See Dark Daily, “COVID-19 Triggers a Cash Flow Crash at Clinical Labs Totaling US $5.2 Billion in Past Seven Weeks; Many Labs Are at Brink of Financial Collapse,” May 4, 2020.)

Can Clinical Laboratories Hang on Financially Until COVID-19 Goes Away?

Though most states have not met the nonbinding criteria recommended by the Trump administration for reopening, nearly 40 governors in early May began loosening stay-at-home orders, reported CNN, including allowing elective medical procedures to resume.

Patients may make up for lost time by returning to doctors’ offices for medical laboratory tests and other COVID-19-delayed procedures, and as this happens, clinical laboratories may experience a surge in routine test orders from doctors’ offices and hospital admissions once stay-at-home orders are lifted and fear of COVID-19 has passed.

According to an article published on Axios, a survey of 163 physicians conducted by SVB Leerink—an investment firm that specializes in healthcare and life sciences—found that “roughly three out of four doctors believe patient appointments will resume to normal, pre-coronavirus levels, no earlier than July, and 45% expect a rebound to occur sometime between July and September.” If so, the financial squeeze facing clinical laboratories, pathology groups, and other medical and dental professionals may continue to loosen.

Christopher Freer, DO, an emergency physician at St. Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx and Director of Emergency Medicine at RWJ Barnabas Health
Christopher Freer, DO (above), an emergency physician at St. Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx and Director of Emergency Medicine at RWJBarnabas Health, told CNBC that emergency departments are seeing patients with severe issues, such as stroke and appendicitis, but that those with milder symptoms appear to be staying away. “Even with coronavirus, we still have healthy people who get an illness and need to go to the emergency room,” he said. “Heart attacks don’t stop.” (Photo copyright: USA Today.)

Hospital Finances Are Being Particularly Stressed by Loss of Patients

The impact of stay-at-home orders on hospital systems, in particular, has been dramatic. CNBC reported that RWJBarnabas Health, an 1l-hospital 22-laboratory health system in New Jersey that has 11 emergency departments, totaled just 180 emergency room visits per day during a mid-April weekend, a sharp decline from their 280-per-day-average.

A recent Washington Post article paints an even bleaker picture. Clinicians in the United States, Spain, United Kingdom, and China anecdotally report a “silent sub-epidemic of people who need care at hospitals but dare not come in,” the article states, noting people with symptoms of appendicitis, heart attacks, stroke, infected gall bladders, and bowel obstructions are avoiding hospital emergency rooms.

“Everybody is frightened to come to the ER,” Mount Sinai Health System cardiovascular surgeon John Puskas, MD, told the Post. Though his 60-bed cardiac unit had been repurposed to care for COVID-19 patients, Puskas said the New York hospital system was seeing “dramatically fewer” cardiac patients. 

Concerned that patients may be ignoring signs of heart attack or stroke rather than go to a hospital, the American College of Cardiology launched the “CardioSmart” campaign, which urges anyone experiencing heart symptoms to get prompt treatment and to continue routine appointments, using telehealth technology when available.

“Hospitals have safety measures to protect you from infection,” the CardioSmart website states. “Getting care quickly is critical. You’ll get better faster, and you’ll limit damage to your health.”

However, David Brown, MD, Chief of Emergency Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, argues the number of people having heart-related issues is unlikely to have dropped during the pandemic.

“Strokes and heart attacks don’t take a vacation just because there’s a pandemic,” Brown told The Boston Globe. “They’re still happening. They just aren’t happening as much inside the hospital, which is a major concern to me.”

Many healthcare professionals are worried about the long-term effect from pandemic-delayed preventative and elective procedures.

“The big question is are we going to see a lot more people that have bad outcomes from heart disease, from stroke, from cancer because they’ve put off what they should have had done, but were too afraid to come to the hospital?” Providence St. Joseph Health CEO Rod Hochman, MD, told CNBC.

Hochman, who is Chair-elect of the American Hospital Association (AHA), maintains the aftereffects of people putting off elective surgeries and screening procedures like colonoscopies and mammograms may be felt for years to come.

“We’re possibly going to see a blip in other disease entities as a consequence of doubling down on COVID-19,” he told CNBC.

In clinical laboratories, COVID-19 testing may have somewhat helped offset the drop in routine testing volume. However, the pandemic’s overall financial costs to labs and pathology groups will likely be felt for months to years, as patients slowly return to healthcare providers’ offices and hospitals.

—Andrea Downing Peck

Related Information:

From Mid-March, Labs Saw Big Drop in Revenue

Opening Up America Again

Doctors Worry the Coronavirus Is Keeping Patients Away from U.S. Hospitals as ER Visits Drop: ‘Heart Attacks Don’t Stop.’

When Doctors Think Patient Visits Will Rebound

Coronavirus and Your Heart: Don’t Ignore Heart Symptoms

‘Strokes and Heart Attacks Don’t Take a Vacation.’ So Why Have Emergency Department Visits Sharply Declined?

This is Where All 50 States Stand on Reopening

COVID-19 Triggers a Cash Flow Crash at Clinical Labs Totaling US $5.2 Billion in Past Seven Weeks; Many Labs Are at Brink of Financial Collapse

COVID-19 Pandemic Triggers Decline in Anatomic Pathology Testing and Shows How Digital Pathology, Remote Sign-Out Can Increase Pathology Services

Because of ‘shelter in place’ orders, many anatomic pathologists are reviewing digital images from home during the COVID-19 outbreak and demonstrating the value of whole slide imaging, digital pathology, and CMS’ recent amended remote sign-out policy

COVID-19 is already triggering many permanent changes in the way healthcare is organized and delivered in the United States. However, not until the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic eases will the full extent of these changes become visible. This will be particularly true for anatomic pathology and the profession’s expanded use of telepathology, digital pathology, and whole-slide imaging.

Since early March, specimen referrals and revenues have collapsed at anatomic pathology groups and laboratories across the nation. Dark Daily’s sister publication, The Dark Report (TDR), was first to quantify the magnitude of this collapse in tissue referrals to pathology groups. In an interview with The Dark Report, Kyle Fetter, Executive Vice President and General Manager of Diagnostic Services at XIFIN, Inc., explained that pathology clients using XIFIN’s revenue cycle management services were seeing an average 40% decrease in specimens. And, for certain pathology sub-specialties, the drop-off in specimen referrals was as much as 90%. (See TDR, “From Mid-March, Labs Saw Big Drop in Revenue,” April 20, 2020.)

The College of American Pathologists (CAP) appealed to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to allow pathologists to work remotely. In response, CMS issued a memorandum which stated, “Due to the public health emergency posed by COVID-19 and the urgent need to expand laboratory capacity, CMS is exercising its enforcement discretion to adopt a temporary policy of relaxed enforcement in connection with laboratories located at temporary testing sites under the conditions outlined herein.”

Since then, many physicians, including pathologists, have quickly adapted to working remotely in some form.

Push for Remote Pathology Services Acknowledges Anatomic Pathologist Shortage

The CMS memorandum (QSO-20-21-CLIA), which the federal agency issued to laboratory surveyors on March 26, 2020, notes that CMS will exercise “enforcement discretion to ensure pathologists may review pathology slides remotely” if certain defined conditions are met.

CMS’ decision, which “is applicable only during the COVID-19 public health emergency,” is intended to increase capacity by allowing remote site review of clinical laboratory data, results, and pathology slides.

Ordinarily, CLIA regulations for cytology (a branch of study that focuses on the biological structure of cells) state that cytology slide preparations must be evaluated on the premises of a laboratory that is certified to conduct testing in the subspecialty of cytology. However, a fast-acting Congressional letter sent by 37 members of Congress to US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar II, MD, states, “it is unwise and unnecessary to overburden the remaining pathologists with excess work due to staffing shortages, thereby increasing the risk of burnout, medical error, and further shortages in staffing due to exposure. The number of COVID-19 cases will increase and peak over the next two months and will stretch existing healthcare systems to their limits.”

In response to the CMS remote waiver, the CAP committee on Digital and Computational Pathology, and the Informatics committee, published additional guidance on the CAP website.

Decreasing Number of ‘Active Pathologists’ Drives Adoption of Telepathology, Digital Pathology, and Whole-slide Imaging

The current COVID-19 outbreak is just the latest factor in support of enabling remote review of anatomic pathology images and cases. The trend of using telepathology, whole-slide imaging (WSI), and digital pathology systems has been gathering momentum for several years. Powerful economic forces support this trend.

The Dark Report devoted its June 10, 2019, issue to a deep dive of the challenges currently facing the anatomic pathology profession. In particular, TDR noted a study published May 31, 2019, in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network Open, titled, “Trends in the US and Canadian Pathologist Workforces from 2007 to 2017.” The study’s authors—pathologists in the United States and Canada—reported that between 2007 and 2017 the number of active pathologists in the United States decreased from 15,568 to 12,839—a 17.53% decline.

TDR noted that these findings imply there are fewer pathologists in the United States today in active practice to handle the steady increase in the number of cases requiring diagnostic review. In turn, this situation could lead to delays in diagnoses detrimental to patient care.

In fact, the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom is dealing with exactly this situation. The Telegraph reported that one in four cancer patients in the UK have delays of as much as eight weeks in the diagnosis of their biopsy. It is generally recognized that the UK lacks the number of histopathologists it needs to substantially shorten time to diagnoses. To address this, the NHS is implementing a national digital pathology network featuring Amazon’s Alexa virtual assistant to deliver health advice to the UK’s citizens. (See Dark Daily, “UK’s NHS Will Use Amazon Alexa to Deliver Official Health Advice to Patients in the United Kingdom,” December 2, 2019.)

In the United States, the COVID-19 pandemic created an “immediate need for remote sign-outs, reviews, and consults,” said Mike Bonham, MD, PhD (above), Chief Medical Officer for Proscia, a digital pathology software developer, in an interview with Dark Daily. “In the context of highly relevant workflow and workforce challenges, it reinforces the opportunity for wider adoption of digital pathology.” Prior to the outbreak of COVID-19, several distinct forces were driving adoption and use of digital pathology in combination with traditional microscopy, he said. (Photo copyright: Proscia.)

Distinct Forces Beginning to Reshape Anatomic Pathology

In recent years, the anatomic pathology profession has faced growing financial pressure, a shrinking workforce, and a surge in the global demand for pathology—issues that come at a time when biopsies and cancer diagnostics require greater expertise.

As Dark Daily and The Dark Report previously reported, digital pathology gained momentum starting with the US Food and Drug Administration’s approval to market the Philips IntelliSite Pathology Solution (PIPS) whole-slide imaging (WSI) system in April 2017. The second WSI system cleared by the FDA was the Aperio AT2 DX System from Leica Biosystem Imaging.

When it comes to adopting a digital pathology system (DPS), it is important to realize that digital pathology testing has moved forward at a rapid pace outside the US, explains a new white paper from Dark Daily, titled, “Anatomic Pathology at the Tipping Point? The Economic Case for Adopting Digital Technology and AI Applications Now.”

Gaining knowledge and first-hand experience of digital pathology adoptions is vital to future business development in anatomic pathology services.

Emerging Cancer Diagnostics Using Digital Pathology and Computational Solutions

Digital pathology adoption can be seen in various specialties of cancer care—in particular skin, breast, and prostate. One example is the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine, which adopted digital pathology in February 2015.

The UCSF School of Medicine started with frozen slide sections and moved to the broader volume of pathology slides. Since 2015, UCSF’s School of Medicine has moved toward a fully digital pathology operation and has serialized the adoption by specialty, according to Zoltan Laszik, MD, PhD, attending physician at UCSF and Professor of Clinical Pathology in UCSF’s Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

Laszik is among a handful of specialists and digital pathology early adopters who collaborated on the new Dark Daily white paper, which is available for free download.  

Through the adoption of digital pathology, glass slides are digitized using a whole-slide image scanner, then analyzed through image viewing software. Although the basic viewing functionality is not drastically different than that provided by a microscope, digitization does bring improvements in lab efficiency, diagnostic accuracy, image management, workflows, and revenue enhancements.

Additionally, artificial intelligence (AI)-based computational applications have emerged as an integral part of the digital pathology workflow in some settings, the white paper explains.

“These developments are important to anatomic pathologists because the traditional pathology business model continues to transform at a steady pace,” noted Robert L. Michel, Editor-in-Chief of The Dark Report.

Anthony Magliocco, MD, FRCPC, FCAP, President and CEO of Protean BioDiagnostics and former Professor and Chair of Pathology at Moffitt Cancer Center, is featured in the white paper as well. His new pathology service model provides routine pathology services, precision oncology, second opinions, liquid biopsies, genetics, and genomics to cancer centers from a Florida-based specialty laboratory.

In addition to the white paper, Magliocco will share his experience adopting digital pathology during a free webinar, titled, “Streamlined Operations, Increased Revenue, Higher Quality of Care: Conclusive Evidence on the Value of Adopting Digital Pathology in Your Lab.” The webinar takes place Wednesday, May 13, and is hosted by Dark Daily.

To register for this important learning opportunity, click here or place this URL in your web browser: https://www.darkdaily.com/webinar/streamlined-operations-increased-revenue-higher-quality-of-care-conclusive-evidence-on-the-value-of-adopting-digital-pathology-in-your-lab/.

These digital pathology technologies represent an innovative movement shaping the present and future of pathology services. Pathologists wanting to learn more are encouraged to sign up for the May 13 webinar, which will build on the body of evidence and commentary that is included in the new white paper, and which will be available for free on-demand download following the live broadcast.

—Liz Carey

Related Information

Free Download New White Paper: Anatomic Pathology at the Tipping Point? The Economic Case for Adopting Digital Technology and AI Applications Now

To Register for Free Webinar Taking Place on May 13, 1 pm Eastern

Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) Laboratory Guidance During COVID-19 Public Health Emergency

Trends in the US and Canadian Pathologist Workforces From 2007 to 2017

UK’s NHS Will Use Amazon Alexa to Deliver Official Health Advice to Patients in the United Kingdom

New Telemedicine Strategies Help Hospitals Address COVID-19

CMS Memorandum: QSO-20-21-CLIA, March 26, 2020

Rush, Carter Lead Successful Effort to Ensure Pathologists are Able to Address Critical Testing Needs During Pandemic

March 25, 2020, Congressional Letter to HHS Secretary Alex Azar II, MD

CAP Secures Remote Work Waiver for Pathologists

Recent Updates on COVID-19: Remote Sign-Out of Cases with Digital Pathology FAQs

Laboratory Staff Turnover: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 23 Clinical Laboratories

Is the Profession of Anatomic Pathology Shrinking?

Expert Sees Pros, Cons in DP and WSI Systems

Live Event Update: Executive War College on Laboratory and Pathology Management

;