News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel
Sign In

Pathologist and Radiologists Head toward a Collision… or Will It Be a Collaboration!

How much longer will anatomic pathologists spend the majority of their time in a quiet office, viewing glass slides through a microscope? Will radiologists and pathologists soon collaborate on diagnosing the patient and jointly releasing an integrated patient report to the referring physician?

Should you think these scenarios are several years into the future, you may be surprised to learn that first-mover pathology groups and radiology groups are in the earliest stages of fully-digital (non-glass) pathology and collaborative diagnosis/patient reporting. These pathologists and radiologists will tell you that this is an exciting time and they are advancing patient care because of these innovations.

At University of Kansas, an extraordinary collaboration was launched last summer involving Ossama W. Tawfik, M.D., Ph.D., Director of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology and his colleague; Mark L. Redick, M.D., Assistant Professor of Radiology, University of Kansas. Tawfik and Redick began meeting regularly to jointly review selected breast cancer cases. “It was quickly obvious to us both that, by reviewing each other’s primary clinical data together, there were immediate benefits to the referring physician and the patient,” noted Tawfik. “We’ve learned two things from this collaboration. First, there have been few changes in the diagnostic aspect of the cases we review. Second, on the treatment side, our pathology/radiology integration is driving significant changes in how the patient receives treatment and what therapies are recommended.”

Tawfik and Redick are speaking about their in vivo/in vitro collaboration at the upcoming Molecular Summit on the Integration of In Vivo and In Vitro Diagnostics in Philadelphia on February 10-11, 2009. Location is the Sheraton Society Hill Hotel in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

At Molecular Summit 2009, the future of the glass slide versus an all-digital pathology service will be discussed by CEOs from industry-leading firms such as Aperio Technologies, Inc., BioImagene, Inc., and DMetrix, Inc.. One sure sign that pathologists are adopting slide scanning and digital pathology systems is the accelerating rate of sales of digital systems reported by these three companies during the past 24 months.

Pathologists and radiologists wanting to stay at the top of their game and profit from the opportunities unfolding in personalized medicine and vivo/in vitro integration should register to attend Molecular Summit 2009. This year’s top-flight event has a distinguished faculty of 27 international experts and covers the spectrum of advanced molecular diagnostics, imaging, and informatics. Unique case studies provide attendees with everything they need to know to advance their molecular skills and tap new sources of patient referrals and income.

Register today and guarantee your place at this important event for pathology and radiology! The full agenda and speaker line-up for Molecular Summit 2009 on February 10-11 can be viewed here (or paste this URL into your browser: )


Download Full Program Brochure

Four Easy Ways to Register:
1. Register ONLINE
2. Call 800-560-6363. Our friendly staff can register you quickly and easily, as well as answer any questions you may have.
3. Fax this complete registration form to 512-264-0969
4. Mail the one page register form with payment to:

21806 Briarcliff Dr.
Spicewood, TX 78669

Big Policy Shift on EMR and E-Health by American College of Physicians

It’s big news when the nation’s largest medical specialty organization shifts its policy on physician use of electronic medical record (EMR) systems and e-health services. The American College of Physicians (ACP), in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, issued a new position paper.

ACP says that physicians, patients, technology companies, and policymakers must collaborate to foster e-health activities and electronic communication among physicians and patients. ACP further states that e-health activities-including remote monitoring of patients, personal and electronic health records, and patients seeking health information on-line-have the potential to transform health care in the United States!

“E-health activities have great potential to improve the quality of patient care, reduce medical errors, increase efficiency and access to care, and achieve substantial cost savings,” said ACP President David C. Dale, MD, FACP. “Furthermore, e-health is a critical part of the patient-centered medical home model of care, which in coordination with the other components, is the future of the U.S. health care delivery system.”

The new positions adopted by the ACP are useful for those pathologists and laboratory directors tracking acceptance of new technologies by physicians. Laboratories that establish electronic links with their physician clients end to enjoy a more productive relationship with those physicians.

The ACP’s new position paper is significant for two more reasons. First, it is a statement by ACP that its 125,000 physician-members are ready to embrace and adopt these new technologies. That’s a change from past years, when healthcare lagged other industries in its adoption of information systems and new technology. Second, physicians have been criticized for their collective reticence to adopt electronic medical record systems. The ACP’s position paper specifically calls for physicians and other stakeholders to recognize the potential that information technology holds for transforming healthcare.

“A recent report from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation estimates electronic medical record (EMR) use in the ambulatory (physician) setting at 24% and in the inpatient (hospital) setting at 61%,” stated the ACP in its position paper. “According to a 2006 ACP member survey, adoption also varies by practice size; smaller practices (five or fewer physicians) have an adoption rate of 18%, while larger groups, (20 or more physicians) have an adoption rate of 58%. Those practices that have implemented EMRs may also include such services as online appointment self-scheduling and secure patient-physician messaging. This interaction between patients and their physicians through the use of electronic tools for health-related purposes has been broadly defined as e-health.”

In addition to citing the potential the IT holds for healthcare, the ACP position paper also acknowledges the barriers to more widespread adoption of information systems in healthcare. For physicians, the challenges of implementing e-health systems can be substantial in part because IT is expensive and the return on investment is not always certain. “For physicians, the financial costs of purchasing systems and incorporating e-health offerings can be considerable,” ACP said.

ACP also recommended investment in demonstration projects to assess how e-health activities can support the relatively new concept of the patient-centered medical home. A patient-centered medical home is an approach to providing comprehensive primary care for patients of all ages and medical conditions. Dark Daily has already alerted its clients and subscribers to the growing support behind the medical home concept (See Dark Daily, August 8, 2008, Doctors Promote “Medical Homes” as Way to Take Us Back to the Future ).

Related Articles