News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

Sign In

Lancet Study Finds Urgent Need for Improvement in Clinical Laboratory Prostate Cancer Screening Worldwide

Ongoing increases in the global number of prostate cancer cases expected to motivate test developers to deliver better screening tests to pathologists and clinical lab scientists

No less an authority than the peer-reviewed healthcare journal The Lancet is drawing attention to predictions of increasing prostate cancer cases across the globe, triggering calls for the development of cheaper, faster, and more accurate assays that pathologists and medical laboratories can use to screen for—and diagnose—prostate cancer.

Swift population growth and rising life expectancy will cause the prostate cancer death rate to nearly double in the next 20 years, according to a new study that has led scientists to call for immediate, critical improvements in clinical laboratory testing for cancer screening, Financial Times (FT) reported.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) partnered with The Lancet Commission for the study. They found the strongest need is with underserved populations.

“Low- and middle-income countries need to prepare to prevent a sharp rise in fatalities while richer nations should pay more attention to young men at higher risk of the disease,” FT noted. The study, titled, “The Lancet Commission on Prostate Cancer: Planning for the Surge in Cases,” predicts cases will jump from 1.4 million in 2020 to 2.9 million by 2040.

“Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in 112 countries, and accounts for 15% of cancers. In this Commission, we report projections of prostate cancer cases in 2040 on the basis of data for demographic changes worldwide and rising life expectancy. … This surge in cases cannot be prevented by lifestyle changes or public health interventions alone, and governments need to prepare strategies to deal with it,” the study authors wrote.

“The findings in this Commission provide a pathway forward for healthcare providers and funders, public health bodies, research funders, governments, and the broader patient and clinical community,” the authors noted. In their Lancet paper, the researchers define clear areas for improvement.

Given the shortage worldwide of pathologists—especially highly-trained pathologists—the gap between the demand/need for expanded prostate cancer testing as screens (along with prostate biopsies) and the available supply of pathologists will encourage companies to develop screening and diagnostic tests that are accurate and automated, thus increasing the productivity of the available pathologists.

“As more and more men around the world live to middle and old age, there will be an inevitable rise in the number of prostate cancer cases. We know this surge in cases is coming, so we need to start planning and take action now,” said Nick James, PhD (above), Professor of Prostate and Bladder Cancer Research at The Institute of Cancer Research, in a press release. Pathologists and medical laboratories worldwide will want to monitor progress of The Lancet Commission’s recommendations. (Photo copyright: Institute of Cancer Research.)

Focus on Outreach, AI, Research/Development

“The only thing you can do to mitigate the damage … is to set up programs that diagnose it earlier to allow earlier treatment,” Nick James, PhD, The Lancet Commission study’s lead author, told the Financial Times. James is Professor of Prostate and Bladder Cancer Research at The Institute of Cancer Research (IRC) and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London.

“Evidence-based interventions, such as improved early detection and education programs, will help to save lives and prevent ill health from prostate cancer in the years to come. This is especially true for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) which will bear the overwhelming brunt of future cases,” he said in a press release.

Communication is key. “Improved outreach programs are needed to better inform people of the key signs to look out for and what to do next,” James N’Dow, MD, Professor and Chair in Surgery and Director of the Academic Urology Unit at the University of Aberdeen in the UK, told the Financial Times. “Implementing these in tandem with investments in cost-effective early diagnostic systems will be key to preventing deaths,” he added.

Capitalizing on artificial intelligence (AI) analysis to help translate results was another area The Lancet Commission researchers focused on, Financial Times noted.

AI could “subdivide disease into potentially valuable additional subgroups to help with treatment selection. In environments with few or no pathologists, these changes could be transformational,” the study authors wrote.

High Income Countries (HICs) would benefit from AI by empowering patients. “Linking cloud-based records to artificial intelligence systems could allow access to context-sensitive, up-to-date advice for both patients and health professionals, and could be used to drive evidence-based change in all settings,” the study authors added. Such a trend could lead to specialist prostate cancer pathologists being referred cases from around the world as digital pathology systems become faster and less expensive.

Effective treatment strategies and bolstering areas of need is also key, the study notes. “Many LMICs have urgent need for expansion of radiotherapy and surgery services,” the study authors wrote. The researchers stress the need to immediately implement expansion programs to keep up with anticipated near-future demand.

Cancer drug therapy should follow suit.

“Research and the development of risk-stratified regulatory models need to be facilitated,” the study authors noted, citing a focus on drug repurposing and dose de-escalation. “Novel clinical trial designs, such as multi-arm platforms, should be supported and expanded,” they added.

Unique Needs of LMICs, HICs

The Lancet Commission researchers’ recommendations shift depending on the financial health of a specific area. HICs are experiencing a 30-year decline in the number of deaths resulting from prostate cancer, presumably from additional testing measures and public health campaigns that may be lacking in LMICs, Financial Times reported. And as population growth soars, low-to-middle income populations “will need to be prepared for the strain the expected surge in cases will put on health resources.”

For HICs, the study dissected the limitations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. The researchers pointed out that PSA’s inaccuracies in screening symptomless patients can pinpoint “cancers that may never cause symptoms and need no treatment,” Financial Times reported.

Missing high-risk cases was also a cause for concern. “Diagnostic pathways should be modified to facilitate early detection of prostate cancer while avoiding overdiagnosis and overtreatment of trivial disease,” the study notes.

Screenings for high-risk younger men, and continuing public campaigns about prostate cancer, should be a focus for HICs, the study authors noted. “These would include people who have a family history of the disease, are of African ancestry, or carry a genetic mutation known as BRCA2,” Financial Times reported.

While the undertaking may sound intimidating—there is already such a heavy impact worldwide from prostate cancer—the researchers are optimistic of their recommendations.

“Options to improve care are already available at moderate cost. We found that late diagnosis is widespread worldwide, but especially in LMICs, where it is the norm. Early diagnosis improves prognosis and outcomes, and reduces societal and individual costs, and we recommend changes to the diagnostic pathway that can be immediately implemented,” the study authors wrote.

What Comes Next

“More research is needed among various ethnic groups to expand understanding of prostate cancer beyond the findings from studies that were largely based on data from white men,” The Lancet Commission told the Financial Times.

Astute pathologists and medical laboratories will want to monitor efforts to develop assays that are inexpensive, more accurate, and produce faster answers. Demand for these tests will be substantial—both in developed and developing nations.

—Kristin Althea O’Connor

Related Information:

Prostate Cancer Rise Sparks Call for Overhaul of Testing

The Lancet Commission on Prostate Cancer: Planning for the Surge in Cases

Lancet Commission Predicts Sharp Increase in Global Prostate Cancer Cases

The Lancet: Prostate Cancer Cases Expected to Double Worldwide Between 2020 and 2040, New Analysis Suggests

Prostate Cancer Cases Might Rise to 3 Million Globally by 2040

US Works with Clinical Laboratories to Launch Several Large-Scale COVID-19 Serological Surveys to Track Undetected COVID-19 in the Nation’s Population

Though some experts claim widespread antibody testing is key to effective public health safety, the WHO warns positive serological tests may not indicate immunity from reinfection or transmission of SARS-CoV-2

It may be the largest program of clinical laboratory testing ever conducted in the United States. Health officials are preparing to undertake large-scale serological surveys (serosurveys) to detect and track previously undetected cases of SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus, that causes the COVID-19 illness.

Microbiologists, epidemiologists, and medical laboratory leaders will be interested in these studies, which are aimed at determining how many adults in the US with no confirmed history of SARS-CoV-2 infection actually possess antibodies to the coronavirus.

Serological screening testing may also enable employers to identify employees who can safely return to their job. And researchers may be able to identify communities and populations that have been most affected by the virus.

Serological Study of COVID-19 Taking Place in Five States

In an interview with Science, Michael Busch, MD, PhD, Senior Vice President, Research and Scientific Affairs of Vitalant (formerly Blood Systems), one of the nation’s oldest and largest nonprofit community blood service providers, and Director of the Vitalant Research Institute, discussed several serological studies in which he is involved. The first study, which he said is being funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), is taking place in six metropolitan regions in the US: Seattle, New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boston, and Minneapolis.

The interesting twist in these studies is that they will test blood samples from people donating blood. In March, participating blood centers in each region started saving 1,000 donor samples per month. Six thousand samples will be assessed monthly for a six-month period using an antibody testing algorithm that enables researchers to monitor how people develop SARS-CoV-2 antibodies over time.

Busch told Science this regional study will evolve into three “national, fully representative serosurveys of the US population using blood donors.” This particular national serosurvey will study 50,000 donations in September and December of 2020 and in November 2021.

“We’re going to be estimating overall antibody prevalence to SARS-CoV-2 within each state, but also map it down within the states to regions and metropolitan urban areas, and look at the differences,” Busch told Science, which called the serosurvey “unprecedented.”

“It’s certainly the largest serosurvey I’ve ever been involved with,” Busch said.

Serological versus PCR Testing for COVID-19

Unlike polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR)-based COVID-19 diagnostic testing, which uses nasopharyngeal swabs to detect the presence of viral RNA, serological testing such as LabCorp’s 164055 IgG test looks for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in blood samples. A positive test indicates a previous infection.

In the third NIH serosurvey, according to Busch, NIH blood-donor serosurveys will be compared with results from population serosurveys taking place through the University of Washington and University of California San Francisco, which involve neighborhood door knocking and sampling from hematology labs.

“An antibody test is looking back into the immune system’s history with a rearview mirror,” said Matthew J. Memoli, MD (above,) an infection disease specialist with the NIH and Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), in a news release. “By analyzing an individual’s blood, we can determine if that person has encountered SARS-CoV-2 previously.” (Photo copyright: National Institutes of Health.)

Some of the SARS-CoV-2 serological surveys underway include:

  • The National Institutes of Health serosurvey involving as many as 10,000 adults in the US who have no confirmed history of infection with SARS-CoV-2, which will analyze blood samples for two types of antibodies—anti-SARS-CoV-2 protein IgG and IgM. Researchers also may perform additional tests to evaluate volunteers’ immune responses to the virus.
  • A World Health Organization (WHO) coordinated follow-up study to its Solidarity Trial named Solidarity 2, which will “pool data from research groups in different countries to compare rates of infection,” which WHO officials say is ‘critical’ to understanding the true extent of the pandemic and to inform policy, Research Professionals News reported.
  • In Germany, the Robert Koch Institute, the country’s disease control and prevention agency, is tackling Europe’s first large-scale COVID-19 antibody testing. Its three-phase study will include serological testing on blood from donation centers, followed by testing on blood samples from coronavirus regional hotspots and then the country’s broader population.

But Can Serological Testing Prove Immunity to COVID-19?

Dark Daily previously reported on the critical role serology testing played in Singapore to help officials use contact tracing to identify people involved in COVID-19 outbreaks. (See, “Asian Cities, Countries Stand Out in the World’s Fight Against COVID-19, US Clinical Laboratory Testing in the Spotlight,” March 30, 2020.)

However, whether having COVID-19 antibodies will make people immune to reinfection or unable to spread the disease is not yet known.

“We don’t have nearly the immunological or biological data at this point to say that if someone has a strong enough immune response that they are protected from symptoms, … that they cannot be transmitters,” Michael Mina, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Epidemiology at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Associate Medical Director in Clinical Microbiology (molecular diagnostics) in the Department of Pathology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, told STAT.

The Times of Sweden reported the WHO warned in mid-April that there is no proof recovering from COVID-19 provides immunity.

“There are a lot of countries that are suggesting using rapid diagnostic serological tests to be able to capture what they think will be a measure of immunity,” said Maria Van Kerkhove, PhD, the WHO’s Technical Lead for COVID-19, at a news conference in Geneva, Switzerland, the Times of Sweden reported.

“Right now, we have no evidence that the use of a serological test can show that an individual has immunity or is protected from reinfection,” she said, adding, “These antibody tests will be able to measure that level of seroprevalence—that level of antibodies—but that does not mean that somebody with antibodies [is] immune.”

In addition, the reliability and quality of some serological tests produced in China, as well as some being manufactured in the US, have come into question, the Financial Times reported.

Nevertheless, as serological testing for COVID-19 becomes more widespread, clinical laboratories should plan to play an ever-increasing role in the battle to stop a second wave of the epidemic in this country.

—Andrea Downing Peck

Related Information:

Unprecedented Nationwide Blood Studies Seek to Track U.S. Coronavirus Spread

WHO Marshalls Global Study of Coronavirus Infection

Population-based Age-stratified Seroepidemiological Investigation Protocol for COVID-19 Virus Investigation

How Many People Are Immune to the New Corona Virus? Robert Koch Institute Starts Nationwide Antibody Studies

Everything We Know About Coronavirus Immunity and Antibodies–and Plenty We Still Don’t

The WHO Warns ‘No Evidence’ of Immunity to Corona Virus for Recovered Patients

Quest for Accurate Antibody Tests in Fight Against COVID-19

Asian Cities, Countries Stand Out in the World’s Fight Against COVID-19, US Clinical Laboratory Testing in the Spotlight

UnitedHealth to Acquire Brazil’s Largest Private Health Insurer for a Price of $4.9 Billion

UnitedHealth’s acquisition of Brazil’s Amil is another example of healthcare’s globalization and may open door for clinical laboratory acquisitions in Brazil

UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH) is buying an HMO in Brazil. The two players are the largest insurers in their respective countries. For pathologists and clinical laboratory professionals, this merger demonstrates that the trend toward globalization of healthcare—including laboratory medicine—continues one step at a time.

Brazil’s Growing Middle Class Drives Demand for Coverage

On October 8, 2012, UnitedHealth announced in a press release that it would pay $4.9 billion in cash to acquire a 90% stake in Brazil’s Amil Participacoes S.A. (BM&FBOVESPA: AMIL3). Amil is Brazil’s largest private insurer and operator of health clinics. The company provides health benefits and services to more than five million people. (more…)

;