Encouraging patients—even children—to be more directly involved in their own medical care may reduce the burden on healthcare workers and might even help those clinical laboratories struggling to hire enough phlebotomists to collect specimens
Researchers at Emory University School of Medicine have concluded a study which found that school-aged children can successfully use a nasal swab to obtain their own SARS-CoV-2 test specimens. This may come as a surprise to hospital and clinical laboratory personnel who have performed nasal swabbing for COVID-19 tests. Some people, adults included, find the procedure so uncomfortable it brings tears.
And yet, after being shown a 90-second how-to video and given a handout with written instructions and pictures, 197 Atlanta children who had COVID-19 symptoms between July and August of 2021 performed their own self-swabbing. A healthcare worker then collected a second swabbed sample. All samples were submitted to a clinical laboratory for PCR analysis.
The Emory study provides another example of how the healthcare system is engaging patients to be directly involved in their own medical care. Results of the study could positively impact clinical laboratories facing a shortage of personnel, as well as schools where children have to take repeated COVID-19 tests with the assistance of trained professionals.
In a study with 197 school-age children, researchers at Emory University School of Medicine found that children could self-swab themselves for COVID-19 testing after watching a 90-second instructional video. Clinical laboratory leaders who are short on personnel may find these results intriguing. (Photo copyright: Emory University.)
How Did the Children Do?
The self-collected swabs and those collected by a healthcare worker agreed 97.8% of the time for a positive result and 98.1% of the time for a negative result. The analysis showed that both collection methods identified the 44% of symptomatic kids who were positive for COVID-19.
“Seeing how closely the results line up between the children and trained healthcare workers is a strong indicator that these age groups are fully capable of swabbing themselves if given proper instruction,” said Jesse Waggoner, MD, an Assistant Professor of Infectious Diseases with the Emory University School of Medicine and one of the lead authors on the study, in an Emory University press release.
A higher percentage of children age eight and under needed assistance, such as more instruction before correctly completing self-collection—21.8% compared to 6.1% for children older—but SARS-CoV-2 detection among the two age groups did not differ.
Does FDA Approve of Self-Swabbing?
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not authorized COVID-19 tests that include self-swabbing by children under age 14. However, data from the Emory study, published in JAMA, is now available to test manufacturers seeking authorization for pediatric self-collection.
“Pediatric self-swabbing will support expanded testing access and should make it even easier to test school age populations with fewer resources,” said Tim Stenzel, MD, PhD, Director of the Office of In Vitro Diagnostics at the FDA, in the Emory statement. “This study furthers our knowledge of test accuracy with these types of samples and provides test manufacturers with data to support their EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) requests to the FDA.”
Self-swabbing versus Clinical Laboratory Worker
While it has been longstanding medical practice to have healthcare workers collect samples for respiratory tract infection testing, the Emory researchers suggest that allowing children to collect their own COVID-19 samples could be one way to reduce the burden of a shortage of healthcare workers.
The researchers also believe pediatric self-swabbing would expand access to diagnostic tests and make it easier to test school-age populations.
“Every minute of a healthcare worker’s time is at a premium,” said senior study author Wilbur Lam, MD, Professor of Pediatrics and Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Tech, in a National Institutes of Health (NIH) press release. “Why not allow a kid to self-swab? It’s a win-win! They would rather do it themselves and it frees up the healthcare worker to do other things,” he added.
In 2020, a Stanford University School of Medicine study published in JAMA showed test samples collected by adults who swabbed their own nasal passages were as accurate as those collected by healthcare workers. This study involved 30 participants who had previously tested positive for COVID-19.
Though the Emory University and Stamford University studies were small, they agreed in their findings which is significant. Clinical laboratory executives and pathologists should expect this trend toward direct-to-consumer and other forms of self-testing to continue, even among young patients.
Experts say it is time ‘to restore our confidence in vaccines’ as many medical laboratories take steps to support testing for the polio virus
Clinical laboratories and microbiologists in the state of New York will want to know that, in July, a man in New York was diagnosed with polio and subsequently the virus was detected in the wastewater of two New York counties.
The area, Rockland County, N.Y., just north of New York City, was also at the forefront of a measles outbreak that occurred in 2018 and 2019. The outbreak was attributed to low vaccination rates within the community.
The unidentified, immunocompetent young man was admitted to a New York hospital after experiencing a low-grade fever, neck stiffness, back and abdominal pain, constipation, and lower extremity weakness. He eventually developed paralysis from the disease, which is irreversible.
Poliomyelitis, commonly known as polio, is a disabling and life-threatening disease that is caused by the poliovirus. Though it rarely surfaces in the United States, there is now confirmation of the first US case since 2013.
“The polio vaccine is safe and effective, protecting against this potentially debilitating disease, and it has been part of the backbone of required, routine childhood immunizations recommended by health officials and public health agencies nationwide,” said Mary T. Bassett, MD (left), Health Commissioner at the New York Department of Health, in a press release. Clinical laboratories and microbiologists in New York may want to prepare for an increase in vaccination requests. (Photo copyright: Time.)
Is Polio Back in America? Clinical Laboratories Will Want to Be Prepared
“I think it’s concerning because it can spread,” epidemiologist Walter Orenstein, MD, Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases at Emory University School of Medicine told STAT. “If there are unvaccinated communities, it can cause a polio outbreak.”
According to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), public health experts are working diligently to discover how and where the infected individual contracted polio. The CDC website states that the risk for people who have received the polio vaccine is very low, but there is concern for those who have not received the recommended doses of the vaccine.
“Most of the US population has protection against polio because they were vaccinated during childhood, but in some communities with low vaccine coverage, there are unvaccinated people at risk,” the CDC noted. “Polio and its neurologic effects cannot be cured but can be prevented through vaccination.”
The US uses an injectable polio vaccine for the poliovirus which contains killed viruses. The vaccine “instructs” the immune system to recognize and combat the virus. This inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) is administered to children as a shot in the arm or leg and is typically given in four separate doses.
“The inactivated polio vaccine we have is very effective and very safe and could have prevented this,” Orenstein told STAT. “We need to restore our confidence in vaccines.”
“Based on what we know about this case, and polio in general, the (New York) Department of Health strongly recommends that unvaccinated individuals get vaccinated or boosted with the FDA-approved IPV polio vaccine as soon as possible,” said Mary T. Bassett, MD, Health Commissioner at the New York Department of Health in a press release.
Poliovirus Found in Wastewater via Use of Gene Sequencing
Poliovirus is very contagious and is transmitted through person-to-person contact. The virus lives in an infected person’s throat and intestines and can contaminate food and water in unsanitary conditions. According to the CDC, typical symptoms of the illness include flu-like symptoms such as:
Sore throat
Fever
Tiredness
Nausea
Headache
Stomach pain
Most of these symptoms will disappear within five days, but polio can invade the nervous system and cause more serious complications, such as meningitis, paralysis, and even death.
After confirmation of the new case of polio, wastewater surveillance detected the presence of the poliovirus in Rockland and Orange counties, New York.
Wastewater analysis can uncover pathogens within a community and has been used in the fight against other infectious diseases, including:
“In some regards, wastewater is a public health dream scenario,” said Mark Siedner, MD, an infectious disease doctor at Massachusetts General Hospital and associate professor at Harvard Medical School, in an interview with Fortune. “Everyone poops, and most people poop every day. It provides real-time data on infection rates. In that regard, it’s an extremely powerful tool, particularly good at detecting early warning signs. Before people get sick, we might get a signal.”
Wastewater analysis can provide insights regarding the types of viruses that people within a community are shedding and if the volume of those viruses are increasing. This information can provide scientists with an early marker for an outbreak of an illness that is on the verge of spreading.
Microbiologists and clinical laboratories should be aware of the specific types of infectious agents public health authorities are detecting in wastewater, even as they perform screening and diagnostic tests on their patients for similar infectious diseases.
Polio is Appearing Worldwide
The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) has announced that new cases of polio have been reported in Israel and the United Kingdom. These are countries where polio cases are extremely rare.
This indicates that microbiologists and clinical laboratories managers will want to be on constant alert for uncommon infectious diseases that may appear suddenly, even if those illnesses are rare. Accurate and immediate diagnoses of such infectious diseases could play a major role in triggering a public health response to control potential outbreaks while they are in their earlier stages.
This new technology could replace needle biopsies and allow physicians to detect rejection of transplanted organs earlier, saving patients’ lives
Anatomic pathologists
may be reading fewer biopsy reports for patients with organ transplants in the
future. That’s thanks to a new technology that may be more sensitive to and
capable of detecting organ rejection earlier than traditional needle biopsies.
When clinicians can detect organ transplant rejection
earlier, patients survive longer. Unfortunately, extensive organ damage may
have already occurred by the time rejection is detected through a traditional
needle biopsy. This led a group of researchers at Emory University School of Medicine to
search for a better method for detecting organ rejection in patients with transplants.
The Emory researchers describe the method and technology
they devised in a paper published in Nature Biomedical
Engineering, titled, “Non-Invasive Early Detection of Acute Transplant
Rejection Via Nanosensors of Granzyme B Activity.” The new technology could
make it easier for clinicians to detect when a patient’s body is rejecting a
transplanted organ at an earlier time than traditional methods.
This technology also provides a running measure of processes,
so clinicians have more powerful tools for deciding on the most appropriate
dosage of immunosuppressant
drugs.
“Right now, most tests are aimed at organ dysfunction, and
sometimes they don’t signal there is a problem until organ function is below 50
percent,” Andrew
Adams, MD, PhD Co-Principal Investigator and an Associate Professor of Surgery
at Emory University School of Medicine, in a Georgia
Institute of Technology news release.
How the Technology Works
The method that Adams and his colleagues tested involves the
detection of granzyme B,
a serine protease
often found in the granules of natural killer cells
(NK cells) and cytotoxic
T cells. “Before any organ damage can happen, T cells have to produce granzyme
B, which is why this is an early detection method,” said Gabe Kwong, PhD, Assistant
Professor in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at
Georgia Tech and Emory University, in the news release.
The new technology is made up of sensor nanoparticles in the
shape of a ball with iron oxide in the middle. Amino acids stick out of the
ball like bristles. Each amino acid has a fluorescent molecule attached to the
tip.
The nanoparticles are injected into the patient. Their size
prevents them from gathering in the patient’s tissue or from being flushed out
through the kidneys. They are designed to accumulate in the tissue of the
transplanted organ.
If the T cells in the transplanted organ begin to produce
granzyme B, the amino acids break away from the nanoparticles, releasing the
fluorescent molecules attached to their tips. Those molecules are small enough
to be processed through the kidneys and can be detected in the patient’s urine.
Pathologists Play Crucial Role on Transplant Teams
Anatomical pathologists (histopathologists in the UK) are key
members of transplant teams for many reasons, including their ability to assess
biopsies. The current method for detecting organ transplant rejection involves
needle biopsies. It is considered the gold standard.
However, according to a paper published in the International
Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine: “Although imaging studies
and laboratory findings are important and helpful in monitoring of the
transplanted liver, in many circumstances they are not sensitive enough. For
conditions such as rejection of the transplant, liver histology remains the
gold-standard test for the diagnosis of allograft dysfunction. Therefore,
histopathologic assessments of allograft liver
biopsies have an important role in managing patients who have undergone liver
transplantation.”
There are two main problems with needle biopsies. The first,
as mentioned above, is that they don’t always catch the rejection soon enough.
The second is that the needle may cause damage to the transplanted organ.
“The biggest risk of a biopsy is bleeding and injury to the transplanted organ,” noted Andrew Adams, MD, PhD (above), Co-Principal Investigator and an Associate Professor of Surgery at Emory University School of Medicine, in the Georgia Tech news release. “Then there’s the possibility of infection. You’re also just taking a tiny fraction of the transplanted organ to determine what’s going on with the whole organ, and you may miss rejection or misdiagnose it because the needle didn’t hit the right spot,” he added.
And, according to Kwong, even though biopsies are the gold
standard, the results represent one moment in time. “The biopsy is not
predictive. It’s a static snapshot. It’s like looking at a photo of people in
mid-jump. You don’t know if they’re on their way up or on their way down. With
a biopsy, you don’t know whether rejection is progressing or regressing.”
Future Directions of Emory’s Research
The research conducted by Adams and Kwong, et al, is in its
early stages, and the new technology they created won’t be ready to be used on patients
for some time. Nevertheless, there’s reason to be excited.
Nanoparticles are not nearly as invasive as a needle biopsy.
Thus, risk of infection or damaging the transplanted organ is much lower. And Emory’s
technology would allow for much earlier detection, as well as giving clinicians
a better way to adjust the dose of immunosuppressant drugs the patient takes.
“Adjusting the dose is very difficult but very important
because heavy immunosuppression increases occurrence of infections and patients
who receive it also get cancer more often,” said Kwong. The new technology
provides a method of measuring biological activity rates, which would give
clinicians a clearer picture of what’s happening.
The Emory team’s plan is to enhance the new sensors to
detect at least one other major cause of transplant rejection—antibodies. When
a patient’s body rejects a transplanted organ, it produces antibodies to
neutralize what it sees as a foreign entity.
“Antibodies kill their target cells through similar types of
enzymes. In the future, we envision a single sensor to detect both types of
rejection,” said Kwong.
Adams adds, “This method could be adapted to tease out
multiple problems like rejection, infection, or injury to the transplanted
organ. The treatments for all of those are different, so we could select the
proper treatment or combination of treatments and also use the test to measure
how effective treatment is.”
This line of research at Emory University demonstrates how
expanding knowledge in a variety of fields can be combined in new ways. As this
happens, medical laboratories not only get new biomarkers that can be
clinically useful without the need for invasive procedures like needle biopsies,
but these same biomarkers can guide the selection of more effective therapies.
