News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel

News, Analysis, Trends, Management Innovations for
Clinical Laboratories and Pathology Groups

Hosted by Robert Michel
Sign In

Medical Laboratory Testing Company uBiome Raided by FBI for Alleged Insurance Fraud and Questionable Business Practices

Following the raid, the company’s co-founders resigned from the board of directors

Microbiome testing company, uBiome, a biotechnology developer that offers at-home direct-to-consumer (DTC) test kits to health-conscious individuals who wish to learn more about the bacteria in their gut, or who want to have their microbiome genetically sequenced, has recently come under investigation by insurance companies and state regulators that are looking into the company’s business practices.

CNBC reported that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) raided the company’s San Francisco headquarters in April following allegations of insurance fraud and questionable billing practices. The alleged offenses, according to CNBC, included claims that uBiome routinely billed patients for tests multiple times without consent.

Becker’s Hospital Review wrote that, “Billing documents obtained by The Wall Street Journal and described in a June 24 report further illustrate uBiome’s allegedly improper billing and prescribing practices. For example, the documents reportedly show that the startup would bill insurers for a lab test of 12 to 25 gastrointestinal pathogens, despite the fact that its tests only included information for about five pathogens.”

Company Insider Allegations Trigger FBI Raid

In its article, CNBC stated that “company insiders” alleged it was “common practice” for uBiome to bill patients’ insurance companies multiple times for the same test.

“The company also pressured its doctors to approve tests with minimal oversight, according to insiders and internal documents seen by CNBC. The practices were in service of an aggressive growth plan that focused on increasing the number of billable tests served,” CNBC wrote.

FierceBiotech reported that, “According to previous reports, the large insurers Anthem, Aetna, and Regence BlueCross BlueShield have been examining the company’s billing practices for its physician-ordered tests—as has the California Department of Insurance—with probes focusing on possible financial connections between uBiome and the doctors ordering the tests, as well as rumors of double-billing for tests using the same sample.”

Becker’s Hospital Review revealed that when the FBI raided uBiome they seized employee computers. And that, following the raid, uBiome had announced it would temporarily suspend clinical operations and not release reports, process samples, or bill health insurance for their services.

The company also announced layoffs and that it would stop selling SmartJane and SmartGut test kits, Becker’s reported.

uBiome Assumes New Leadership

Following the FBI raid, uBiome placed its co-founders Jessica Richman (CEO) and Zac Apte (CTO) on administrative leave while conducting an internal investigation (both have since resigned from the company’s board of directors). The company’s board of directors then named general counsel, John Rakow, to be interim CEO, FierceBiotech reported.

John Rakow (center) is shown above with uBiome co-founders Jessica Richman (lower left) and Zac Apte (lower right). In a company statement, Rakow stressed that he believed in the company’s products and ability to survive the scandal. His belief may be based on evidence. Researchers have been developing tests based on the human microbiome for everything from weight loss to predicting age to diagnosing cancer. Such tests are becoming increasingly popular. Dark Daily has reported on this trend in multiple e-briefings. (Photo copyrights: LinkedIn/uBiome.)

After serving two months as the interim CEO, Rakow resigned from the position. The interim leadership of uBiome was then handed over to three directors from Goldin Associates, a New York City-based consulting firm, FierceBiotech reported. They include:

Four testing products remain available for in-home testing on the uBiome website:

What Went Wrong?

Richman and Apte founded uBiome in 2012 with the intent of marketing a new test that would prove a link between peoples’ microbiome and their overall health. The two founders initially raised more than $100 million from venture capitalists, and, according to PitchBook, uBiome was last valued at around $600 million, Forbes reported.

Nevertheless, as a company, uBiome’s future is uncertain. Of greater concern to clinical laboratory leaders is whether at-home microbiology self-test kits will become a viable, safe alternative to tests traditionally performed by qualified personnel in controlled laboratory environments.

Dark Daily reported on the controversy surrounding this trend in “At-Home Microbiology Tests Trigger Concerns about Scientific Value and Impact from Microbiologists and Clinical Laboratory Scientists,” October 16, 2017.

It’s a trend worth watching.

—JP Schlingman

Related Information:

Insiders Describe Aggressive Growth Tactics at uBiome, the Health Start-up Raided by the FBI Last Week

FBI Investigating uBiome’s Billing Practices

Turmoil Persists at uBiome with New Management Overhaul Amid FBI Probe: Reports

uBiome Appoints John Rakow as Interim Chief Executive Officer

Another Shakeup at uBiome: Interim CEO Quits

Seven Updates on the Ongoing uBiome Investigation

Microbiome Startup uBiome Cofounders on Administrative Leave after Reports of FBI Raid

Microbiome Testing Startup Under Scrutiny for Billing Practices

At-Home Microbiology Tests Trigger Concerns about Scientific Value and Impact from Microbiologists and Clinical Laboratory Scientists

How One Company’s Saliva Spit Tubes Dominate the DNA Collection Device Market by Maintaining Specimen Integrity for as Long as Two Years

From point-of-care diagnostic tests to ancestral DNA home-testing, this company’s spit tubes are used by more medical laboratories than any other brand

Most clinical laboratory specialists know that OraSure Technologies of Bethlehem, Pa., was the first company to develop a rapid point-of-care DNA diagnostic test for HIV back in the 1990s. This was a big deal. It meant physicians could test patients during office visits and receive the results while the patients were still in the office. Since many patients fail to follow through on doctors’ test orders, this also meant physicians were diagnosing more patients with HIV than ever before.

Today, OraSure is the dominant company in the spit tube industry. OraSure claims its tubes contain patented chemical preservatives that can maintain the specimen’s integrity for up to two years at room temperature. That’s a long time. And this one feature has made OraSure popular with direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic home-test developers.

OraSure provides nearly all of the specimen receptacles used by individuals searching for their ancestral roots. It’s estimated that about 90% of the DTC genetic-testing market uses the company’s spit tubes. This is partly because OraSure makes the only tubes approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for home DNA-testing purposes. 

“The FDA approval gives customers confidence,” Mark Massaro, Managing Director, Senior Equity Analyst at investment bank Canaccord Genuity Group, told Bloomberg. “That, and they can preserve saliva for a long time.”

The OraSure spit tube above contains a patented mix of chemicals that can maintain saliva’s integrity for up to two years at room temperature. This is critical for ensuring specimens arrive at medical laboratories in usable condition to produce accurate test results. (Photo copyright: Zhongjia Sun/Bloomberg Businessweek.)

Spit, Close, Recap, Send

To use the saliva-testing DNA kits, an individual first spits into the tube and then snaps the cap on the tube shut. This action perforates a membrane which contains a patented, chemical mix of preservatives. These chemicals help preserve the sample and minimize contamination from non-human DNA that may be present.

“You’ve got to make it as easy as possible for a person to spit in the tube, close the tube, recap the tube, and send it to you without any variation,” Stephen Tang, PhD, President and Chief Executive Officer at OraSure, told Bloomberg

Saliva samples are very susceptible to environmental factors like temperature and are extremely time sensitive. They need to be properly handled and stored to prevent any degradation and ensure the most accurate test results. Once in the spit tube, a saliva sample can last more than two years at room temperature, according to the company. 

“That’s the secret,” Tang stated. “Saliva is not pure. It’s got a lot of bacteria and other stuff swimming in it.”

OraSure reported the company made $182 million in revenue in 2018, with about $20 million of that amount being profit. DNA Genotek, Inc., a subsidiary of OraSure designed the T-shaped spit tubes being used for consumer-DNA testing kits.

Other Clinical Laboratory Uses for Specimen-Collection Devices

In addition to the consumer-DNA industry, OraSure’s tube technology is used in clinical and academic laboratory situations as well as in veterinary DNA testing. The company is focused on expanding the uses for their specimen-collection technology. They have recently begun using their technology to collect urine specimens for diagnosing sexually transmitted diseases and other conditions. OraSure also has added devices for feces collection, to better compete in the developing field of microbiome for gut bacteria analysis.  

“We are all about the integrity of the sample collection,” Tang says. “It’s a wide-open field.”

Ancestry Sued by OraSure

In 2017, Ancestry.com agreed to pay OraSure $12.5 million to settle a lawsuit which alleged the company had copied OraSure’s patented DNA testing technology to produce their own saliva-based DNA test. 

According to the lawsuit, Ancestry.com purchased saliva test kits from DNA Genotek in 2012 and 2013 for the purpose of collecting saliva samples from their customers. In 2013, Ancestry.com filed for a patent of their own for an improved variation of the kits reportedly without DNA Genotek’s consent. 

OraSure’s test products include:

OraSure also has devices for substance abuse testing, cryosurgical kits for the testing of skin lesions, and kits for forensic toxicology. 

Maintaining specimen integrity is critical to ensure lab test results are accurate and reproducible. OraSure’s spit tube technology solves the problem of preserving specimens while they are transported to clinical laboratories and other pathology facilities. 

—JP Schlingman

Related Information:

One Company Makes Almost All the Home DNA Test Spit Tubes

OraSure Settles Lawsuit with Ancestry.com over DNA Testing

23andMe Socked with FDA Warning Letter and Class Action Lawsuit over Company’s Genetic Testing Services

FDA’s assertion of power to regulate genetic tests is a familiar argument to pathologists and clinical laboratory scientists, but does create problems for 23andMe

It has been national news since November 22, when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent a letter to 23andMe ordering it to stop the sale of direct-to-consumer genetic tests. The FDA said that 23andMe had failed to prove the validity of its genetic tests and gave the company 15 days to respond and  identify the steps it would take to address  FDA concerns.

This event has fulfilled the predictions of many pathologists and clinical laboratory professionals. Having dealt with the FDA throughout their careers, experienced medical laboratory scientists knew that the FDA would eventually take enforcement action against 23andMe, if the company did not provide adequate scientific information to support the clinical validity of its genetic tests. (more…)

Changing Reimbursement for Clinical Pathology Laboratory Testing and Direct-to-Consumer Testing Discussed at California Clinical Laboratory Association Conference in San Diego

The end of fee-for-service payments has huge implications for U.S. medical laboratories and anatomic pathology practices

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA—In the American healthcare system today, the era of fee-for-service medicine will soon end. This development has huge implications for every clinical laboratory and anatomic pathology practice in the United States because fee-for-service is their primary source of revenue.

This week at the 2013 Annual Conference of the California Clinical Laboratory Association (CCLA), no single topic got more attention than that of reimbursement for clinical laboratory tests and anatomic pathology services. (more…)

Scripps Researchers Study Consumer Response to Results of Predictive Genetic Tests

Pathologists likely to be surprised to learn that consumers reach objectively to the results of genetic tests

How consumers will react to the results of genetic tests is a subject of constant debate by many health policy wonks. This same debate has its counterpart in the clinical laboratory testing industry, as pathologists and PhDs discuss the pros and cons of allowing consumers to order their own predictive genetic tests and molecular diagnostic assays.

Rapid developments in whole human genome sequencing will soon make it affordable and fast for any consumer to run their entire genome and have the results analyzed and presented to them in a detailed, easy-to-understand manner. In practical terms, it means medical laboratories and anatomic pathology groups will need to be ready to respond to consumer demand for access to these tests.

(more…)

;