Dec 23, 2016 | Compliance, Legal, and Malpractice, Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory News, Laboratory Operations, Laboratory Pathology, Laboratory Testing
Researchers find shopping for medical laboratory tests increased by nearly 50%, and people are saving more than a million dollars annually by shopping for blood tests
Each year, more consumers use online healthcare price-shopping tools to find hospitals, physicians, and clinical laboratories that have the lowest prices. And medical laboratory tests is among the top services on their lists!
Researchers at Vitals of Lyndhurst, NJ, a company that publishes online physician ratings, analyzed how consumers were using its price and quality transparency tools. They confirmed that shopping for medical laboratory tests/blood work is one of the top healthcare procedures checked by consumers.
According to a recent Vitals press release, approximately 46% more people shopped for blood tests in 2015 than the year before, and they saved $1,149,682 by doing so. That’s because their health plans reward them for selecting good quality and low-price providers, as well as adopting healthy behaviors, such as losing weight, exercising more, and lowering high cholesterol scores. (more…)
Sep 28, 2015 | Coding, Billing, and Collections, Laboratory Instruments & Laboratory Equipment, Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory Pathology, Laboratory Testing
As national health insurers push more risk to hospital systems and medical groups, many hospital administrators become more interested in establishing their own health insurance companies
New modes of provider reimbursement—such as bundled payments and budgeted payments—are motivating hospitals and health systems to reconsider their existing relationships with health insurers. Hospital administrators want to control the dollars they save by improving patient care, instead of allowing insurance companies to capture that money.
To accomplish these goals, more and more hospitals and health systems across the country are making one of three moves:
• Funding their own health plans;
• Partnering with health insurance companies; or,
• Buying health insurance companies.
As this trend gathers momentum, it will put the medical laboratories of hospitals in a much better position to regain access to patients. It can be expected that hospital administrators will include their own clinical laboratories and anatomic pathology providers in their own health insurance provider networks. (more…)
Apr 18, 2012 | Laboratory Management and Operations, Laboratory News, Laboratory Pathology, Management & Operations
Actions by major insurers indicate that ACOs operated by hospitals will have competition
Until recently, most media coverage about nascent accountable care organizations (ACOs) centered on the plans of major hospitals and health systems to organize ACOs within their communities. Now comes news that major health insurers are making sizeable investments as they prepare to launch their own ACOs.
These developments could be auspicious for local clinical laboratories and anatomic pathology groups. It could mean that in many regions around the United States there will be ACOs operated by hospitals/health systems that compete against ACOs operated by health insurance companies. In turn, that would mean more customers for lab testing services in these cities and towns.
(more…)
Jan 7, 2009 | Laboratory News, Laboratory Pathology
Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) is the latest concept in managed care. Primary care physicians, relegated to gatekeeper status in the HMO model of the 1990s, are elevated to the status of healthcare guru, taking the role of coordinating care, counseling, and educating patients. Launching the first statewide Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH), programs are Rhode Island and North Dakota.
The PCMH concept, which has been endorsed by the AMA, is a care delivery model that provides patients continuous access to a personal physician for the majority of their healthcare needs. There are 22 medical home pilots underway throughout the nation, but Rhode Island and North Dakota are first to take the concept statewide.
The leading advocate for the PCMH is the Patient Centered Primary Care Collaborative, a 200-member group that includes major employers, consumer groups, labor unions and healthcare providers and payers. It contends this healthcare model could improve the health of patients, while ensuring viability of the healthcare delivery system through reduced costs associated with shorter hospital stays, fewer hospital readmissions, and emergency department visits.
A statewide pilot of the Rhode Island Chronic Care Sustainability Initiative was launched last October on the heals of a 2004 state law mandating that health plans work to improve accountability in healthcare affordability, accessibility and quality. The pilot includes the state’s three biggest health plans, including the state’s Medicaid plan, Neighborhood Health Plan of Rhode Island’s Rhody Health Partners; Blue Cross and Blue Shield; and United Healthcare. These plans will pay the five participating primary care practices a fee of $3 per member, per month to cover the services of a care-management nurse.
Rhode Island insurers are optimistic about the model’s potential for reducing healthcare costs and improving outcomes. They also suggest that the new care model, which provides compensation for extra time spent caring for patients, will improve physician satisfaction. Not only with this be due to increased reimbursement, but also because the physicians will have the ability to provide consistent care across the board, regardless of the patient’s health plan.
North Dakota has already completed a two-year pilot of its MediQHome Quality Project, a PCMH pilot focused on diabetes care. The pilot demonstrated an estimated $102,000 savings in the care provided to 192 diabetes patients. The state launched its full-fledged, statewide PCMH program on January 1, 2009.
Under the North Dakota program, Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota, the state’s largest health plan, has agreed to pay primary care physicians a semiannual $50 care-management fee for Blues members treated for coronary artery disease, diabetes or hypertension. However, according to a report from Modern Healthcare, Jon Rice, North Dakota Blues CEO/senior vice president, questions the need for a “medical home infrastructure” to achieve better outcomes and cost savings. He points out that the pilot focused on a single health issue, but has yet to prove its mettle as a broad-based quality improvement program.
This mirrors the position of TransforMed, a nonprofit subsidiary of the American Academy of Family Physicians that is concerned with creating a financially sustainable healthcare model through a nationwide medical home system. TransforMed urges that an effective medical home program must address all patients in a primary care practice, not just certain diseases.
If there is a downside to the medical home trend, it is that it adds to the workload for doctors, even as the pool of primary care physicians dwindles. Practicing primary care physicians are leaving the field to enter higher-paying specialties. Fewer medical school students are opting to enter primary care.
Dark Daily expects that one consequence of the medical home movement will be for physicians to shift their lab test utilization patterns toward greater use of predictive testing and risk assessment testing. That’s because a major goal of the medical home arrangement is to encourage early diagnosis and active intervention to help the patient maintain optimal health.
Related Information:
The Dangers of the Decrease In Primary Care Physicians
Dec 24, 2008 | Laboratory News, Laboratory Pathology
Hospitals, physicians, laboratories and others have until January 1, 2009, to provide comments on the proposal by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) on three National Coverage Determinations about preventable surgical errors, or “never events.”
Dark Daily readers know that, beginning October 1, CMS stopped paying hospitals for care or services associated with a list of eight “never events.” Other insurers, including Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Aetna, Cigna Corp and Wellpoint, have followed the CMS lead, implementing similar nonpayment policies for medical errors.
A never event is the industry term for a serious preventable medical incident occurring while the patient is under the care of a medical provider. The National Quality Forum (NQF) has developed a list of 28 never events, ranging from surgical and other procedural errors to sending an infant home with the wrong parents.
CMS is proposing to add these three categories of errors to its “no pay” list:
- Wrong surgical or other invasive procedures performed on a patient
- Surgical or other invasive procedures performed on the wrong body part; and,
- Surgical or other invasive procedures performed on the wrong patient.
The CMS proposal to expand the number of “never events” on the no pay list is not without controversy. So far, the American Medical Association (AMA) and AHA have voiced disagreement with the proposal. The AMA opposes CMS using its National Coverage Determination process, which dictates procedures Medicare will or will not pay for, to fight surgical errors. Instead, the AMA suggests that the agency “develop a clear payment policy outlining the circumstances under which surgery would not be payable by Medicare.” The AHA also wants CMS to provide a clear definition of what costs or services would not be covered, but also wants the agency to describe how it would assign accountability for an error.
Meanwhile, there is support for the CMS “never event” policy from other sectors of healthcare. Researchers determined that, since CMS announced implementation of the first “never event” policy for eight conditions in August 2007, 23 state hospital associations had adopted policies forbidding or discouraging billing for serious preventable medical errors.
Large insurance companies quickly responded to the CMS announcement on “never events” by instituting their own no-pay policies for “never events. Aetna was first to publicize its policy. WellPoint and CIGNA soon announced similar policies.
Hospital laboratories are already experiencing the impact of the first round of the CMS “never event” policy that took effect on October 1, 2008. Among the eight conditions were nosocomial infections and administering incompatible blood products to a patient. In both cases, laboratory test services play a key role in providing clinicians with information to properly diagnose the patient and chose the appropriate course of treatment.
Related Information:
CMS Proposes Three National Coverage Determinations to Protect Patients from Preventable Surgical Errors
What Are Never Events and Why Do They Matter?
