|
Medicare's
Laboratory Competitive Bidding Demonstration Project Is Likely
to be a "Pig in a Poke."
We are only 60 days away from January 1, 2006—the day that
officials at the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are scheduled to announce
which two Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) will be involved
in the Laboratory Services Competitive Bidding Demonstration Project.
Most of you know the familiar adage that one should avoid buying
a pig in a poke. It is a reminder that buyers should look at the
goods before they buy. Unfortunately, the private contractor and
those bureaucrats at CMS responsible for the design and implementation
of this competitive bidding demonstration program have yet to
provide details about the demonstration project to the laboratory
industry. For that reason, with each passing day, it appears the
laboratory industry will be asked to buy this particular pig in
a poke—without an opportunity to see and understand the
design of the competitive bidding demonstration project.
Dark
Daily observes that no one in the laboratory profession should
be surprised at this development. Since 1984, both Congress and
Medicare administration have consistently given laboratory testing
short shrift in funding, annual cost-of-living increases, and
other important issues. Now laboratory testing has been singled
out by Congress for the impending competitive bidding demonstration
project.
Laboratory
managers and pathologists should not overlook another aspect of
this demonstration project. At the time it was announced, CMS
officials stressed that the laboratory profession would be kept
informed and consulted in design and implementation. To that end,
an advisory committee of some notable laboratory professionals
was named. However, that group has neither been convened nor consulted
for their input during the past 12 to 18 months!
What
does this mean for the laboratory industry? Once again, government
is working behind closed doors to create a program that has the
potential to severely damage the financial stability of the laboratory
testing profession. And with only eight weeks to announce the
details of their program and alert laboratories in the affected
MSAs, it is likely that the well-meaning bureaucrats at CMS will
birth a flawed competitive bidding demonstration project.
Remember,
the same minds that dreamed up the requirement that a laboratory
Medicare claim must include the ICD-9 code (which only the referring
physician can provide) before reimbursement will be paid are the
ones responsible for the design and implementation of the laboratory
services competitive demonstration project. So it is probable
that this same flawed thinking will result in a laboratory services
competitive demonstration project which fails to meet its objectives.
It is also probable that the consequences will be corrosive to
the financial integrity of individual laboratories located within
the two MSAs where this demonstration project is conducted. Your
thoughts and insights on this topic are welcome.
Send
them along to us: Robert at rmichel@darkdaily.com
and Sylvia at schristensen@darkdaily.com.
Related
Products:
Executive
War College
2007 taking place in Miami, Florida May 10-11, 2007.
|